Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: foreigners act 1946 section 6 obligations of masters of vessels etc Page 1 of about 34 results (0.102 seconds)

A.H. Magermans Vs. S.K. Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal552,70CWN82

..... 5, contended that the several decisions of the supreme court discussed above, and relied upon by the appellant, did not support his contention that section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act, 1946, should be struck down on the ground of excessive delegation of power. ..... the entrustment was made in favour of the state of west bengal and therefore the power conferred by section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act, 1946, should have been exercised by the state of west bengal. ..... in that case a west german national challenged the vires of section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act, 1946, on the ground that it offended article 14 of the constitution and the supreme court held that the said provision of the foreigners act was intra vires. ..... roy chowdhury argued that clauses (1), (2) and (3) of the foreigners order, 1948, imposed an obligation upon a foreigner to leave india and to confine his stay in india during the period mentioned in the permit. ..... i have already dealt with the question of a foreigner's obligation to obtain a residential permit under the foreigners order, 1948, and a further obligation on his part to leave india before expiry of the date mentioned in the residential permit. ..... the breach of the statutory obligation to frame standing orders involved a criminal liability and it was held by the supreme court that the standing orders which had been framed should be so construed to make them consistent with the obligation to comply with the statutory duty. .....

Premavathy @ Rajathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Gove ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1475; 2004(2)CTC10

..... 4(1) of the foreigners act, 1946 to confine and detain foreigners had become invalid on the passing of the constitution because of articles 21 and 22 and, therefore, to bring this part of the law into the line with the constitution, section 3(1)(b) preventive detention act, 1950 was ..... , in which the division bench of the court has taken a view that such placement in the special camps amounts to preventive detention and chosen to quash the same on the ground that the constitutional obligations of the state government vis-a-vis the detention was not followed. 8. ..... has been reiterated in the counter that it is only for those foreigners who are suspected to be connected with the militant organisations or such persons who are involved in the criminal case in the state or those whose presence outside the special camp might pose a serious threat to the safety and security of the nation and/or to the vips/vvips, etc. ..... that such persons, who are not potentially dangerous or whose life itself is not in danger on account of their connections with the militant organisations could be allowed to go out atleast once a week for making purchases, etc. ..... not being there is also not wholly true inasmuch as one of the inmates became the father of two children though he alone was lodged in the special camp since his family-members like wife, etc. ..... support of his contention that the lodgment in a refugee camp does not amount to detention, the learned counsel for the state of tamil nadu cites kalavathy etc. v. .....

Ramagouda Narasagouda Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

M/s.sarovara Wines Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

Shamiulla Shadaguppi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

Shri.raghaendra S/o Devanna @ Devendra Kamblekar Vs. The State Of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

Manjunath S/o Ramayya Ilager Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

Nagaraj D Jannu Vs. The State Of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

M/s.lotus Wine Shop Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....

M/s.gayatri Liquor Shop, Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r4, r4 & r5 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc.,. ..... , additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarnim aga for r1 to r4, r5 & r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... , aga for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5, r6 - served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. ..... k vidyawati, additional ag for r1 to r4, sri mrutyunjay s hattikeri, advocate for r5) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968, as it is violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. in w.p. .....