Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: foreigners act 1946 section 13 attempts etc to contravene the provisions of this act etc Page 1 of about 451 results (0.219 seconds)

Martinez Montsant Joan Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Ministry of External ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2009(5)ALT120

..... section 14 of the foreigners act, 1946 reads as follows:penalty for contravention of provisions of the act, etc - whoever-(a) remains in any area in india for a period exceeding the period for which the visa was issued to him;(b) does any in violation of the conditions of the valid visa issued to him for his entry and stay in india or any part thereunder;(c) contravenes the provisions of this act or of any order made thereunder or any direction given in pursuance of this act or such order for which no specific punishment is provided under this act,shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may ..... section 14 of the foreigners act, 1946, provides inter alia that the foreigners who contravene the provisions of this act shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five years and shall also be liable to pay fine. ..... according to section 5 of the registration of foreigners act, 1939 any person who contravenes, or attempts to contravene or fails to comply with, any provision of any rule made under the registration of foreigners act, 1939 shall be punished, if a foreigner, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees or with both, or if not a foreigner, with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees. .....

Jonathan Baud Vs. State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

..... in rocket speed the investigation proceeded, and within no time the police submitted final report against him under section 14(b) of the foreigners act 1946. ..... this section provides that any person who contravenes, or attempts to contravene, or fails to comply with, any provision of any rule made under the act shall be punished, if a foreigner, with imprisonment for a term which may extend to one year or with fine which may extend to one thousand rupees or with both. ..... he was arrested on the spot, and the sub inspector of police registered a crime against him under sections 14(b) of the foreigners act, crl.m.c no.4720 of 2014 2 1946 (for short 'the act'). ..... penalty for contravention of provisions of the act, etc- whoever- (a) remains in any area in india for a period exceeding the period for which the visa was issued to him; (b) does any act in violation of the conditions of the valid visa issued to him for his entry and stay in india or any part thereunder; (c) contravenes the provisions of this act or of any order made thereunder or any direction given in pursuance of this act or such order for which no specific punishment is provided under this act, shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which may extend to five ..... attending any meeting is not seen prohibited anywhere under the rules or under the registration of foreigners act, 1939 or the foreigners act 1946.5. .....

Om Parkash Kapoor and anr. Vs. Special Addl. Director of Enforcement a ...

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 2000(56)DRJ505; 2001(73)ECC50

..... state of punjab, : 1970crilj750 .under section 23b, attempts to contravene any of the provisions of this act is punishable as if those provisions of the act were contravened. ..... penalty and procedure--(1) if any person contravenes the provisions of section 4, section 5, section 9, section 10, sub-section (2) of section 12, section 17, section 18-a or section 18-b or of any rule, direction or order made thereunder, he shall: (a) be liable to such penalty not exceeding three times the value of the foreign exchange in respect of which the contravention has taken place, or five thousand rupees, whichever is more, as may be adjudged by the director of enforcement in the manner hereinafter provided, or (b) point no. ..... under section 40 of the same act, the bank is clothed with powers in respect of transactions in foreign exchange, and for authorising purchases and sale of when we turn to the foreign exchange regulation act, we find that variousrestrictions imposed upon transactions in foreign exchange, on payments in respect of blocked accounts, import and export of currency and bullion etc. ..... however, under the emergency provisions (continuance) ordinance, 1946, the aforesaid provisions of the defense of india rules which dealt with restrictions on dealings in foreign exchange and payments etc. .....

A.H. Magermans Vs. S.K. Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal552,70CWN82

..... in that case a west german national challenged the vires of section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act, 1946, on the ground that it offended article 14 of the constitution and the supreme court held that the said provision of the foreigners act was intra vires. ..... but before leaving the question of authentication i should at this stage refer to another challenge made by the appellant to the central government's notification dated april 19, 1952, by which the state government was entrusted with the powers under, inter alia, section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act, 1946. ..... the legislative policy with regard to the entry, stay and departure of foreigners from this country has been sufficiently indicated both in the preamble and in section 3 and section 3a of the foreigners act, 1946. ..... the learned advocate general contended that the registration certificate conferred no right on a foreigner in violation of the provisions in the foreigners act, 1946, and the registration of foreigners rules, 1939. ..... this decision, however, is of no assistance to the appellant in this appeal because we are not concerned in this appeal with the prosecution of the appellant under the foreigners act and the question of validity of his prosecution under the said act was not the subject matter of his petition under article 226 of the constitution, out of which this appeal arises.6. ..... nagappa : [1955]1scr250 , nor should the court attempt to appreciate the evidence on which the tribunal acted: vide state of orissa v. .....

Premavathy @ Rajathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Gove ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1475; 2004(2)CTC10

..... 4(1) of the foreigners act, 1946 to confine and detain foreigners had become invalid on the passing of the constitution because of articles 21 and 22 and, therefore, to bring this part of the law into the line with the constitution, section 3(1)(b) preventive detention act, 1950 was enacted. ..... according to the learned senior counsel, when the parliament has enacted a fresh legislation on the same subject, namely dealing with foreigners providing for greater safeguards, then those provisions would come under the provisions of the latter act and in the absence of the advisory board and the opportunity to the detenu, detention for an unlimited period of time is clearly illegal. 4.6. ..... it has been reiterated in the counter that it is only for those foreigners who are suspected to be connected with the militant organisations or such persons who are involved in the criminal case in the state or those whose presence outside the special camp might pose a serious threat to the safety and security of the nation and/or to the vips/vvips, etc. ..... it is also pointed out that the allegation regarding the privacy not being there is also not wholly true inasmuch as one of the inmates became the father of two children though he alone was lodged in the special camp since his family-members like wife, etc. ..... in support of his contention that the lodgment in a refugee camp does not amount to detention, the learned counsel for the state of tamil nadu cites kalavathy etc. v. .....

Ramagouda Narasagouda Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... supra, the impugned rule cannot be said to be manifestly arbitrary since the said rule is 39 inserted by exercising power under section 71(2)(e) of the act and the impugned rule does not offend the provisions of the act.18. ..... petitioners are all running liquor shops after obtaining cl-2 licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... however this judgment was rendered before amendment of rule 311(c) of the rules, which was inserted by exercising the power under section 71(3)(e) of the act and the impugned rule is in conformity with the provisions of the act and also the source of power to insert the said rule is traceable to section 71(3)(e) of the act. ..... respondents (by smt.k vidyawati, additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. ..... admittedly, the petitioners are also granted with cl-2 retail licenses to sell liquor and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. .....

M/s.sarovara Wines Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... supra, the impugned rule cannot be said to be manifestly arbitrary since the said rule is 39 inserted by exercising power under section 71(2)(e) of the act and the impugned rule does not offend the provisions of the act.18. ..... petitioners are all running liquor shops after obtaining cl-2 licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... however this judgment was rendered before amendment of rule 311(c) of the rules, which was inserted by exercising the power under section 71(3)(e) of the act and the impugned rule is in conformity with the provisions of the act and also the source of power to insert the said rule is traceable to section 71(3)(e) of the act. ..... respondents (by smt.k vidyawati, additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. ..... admittedly, the petitioners are also granted with cl-2 retail licenses to sell liquor and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. .....

Shamiulla Shadaguppi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... supra, the impugned rule cannot be said to be manifestly arbitrary since the said rule is 39 inserted by exercising power under section 71(2)(e) of the act and the impugned rule does not offend the provisions of the act.18. ..... petitioners are all running liquor shops after obtaining cl-2 licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... however this judgment was rendered before amendment of rule 311(c) of the rules, which was inserted by exercising the power under section 71(3)(e) of the act and the impugned rule is in conformity with the provisions of the act and also the source of power to insert the said rule is traceable to section 71(3)(e) of the act. ..... respondents (by smt.k vidyawati, additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. ..... admittedly, the petitioners are also granted with cl-2 retail licenses to sell liquor and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. .....

Shri.raghaendra S/o Devanna @ Devendra Kamblekar Vs. The State Of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... supra, the impugned rule cannot be said to be manifestly arbitrary since the said rule is 39 inserted by exercising power under section 71(2)(e) of the act and the impugned rule does not offend the provisions of the act.18. ..... petitioners are all running liquor shops after obtaining cl-2 licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... however this judgment was rendered before amendment of rule 311(c) of the rules, which was inserted by exercising the power under section 71(3)(e) of the act and the impugned rule is in conformity with the provisions of the act and also the source of power to insert the said rule is traceable to section 71(3)(e) of the act. ..... respondents (by smt.k vidyawati, additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. ..... admittedly, the petitioners are also granted with cl-2 retail licenses to sell liquor and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. .....

Manjunath S/o Ramayya Ilager Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... supra, the impugned rule cannot be said to be manifestly arbitrary since the said rule is 39 inserted by exercising power under section 71(2)(e) of the act and the impugned rule does not offend the provisions of the act.18. ..... petitioners are all running liquor shops after obtaining cl-2 licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... however this judgment was rendered before amendment of rule 311(c) of the rules, which was inserted by exercising the power under section 71(3)(e) of the act and the impugned rule is in conformity with the provisions of the act and also the source of power to insert the said rule is traceable to section 71(3)(e) of the act. ..... respondents (by smt.k vidyawati, additional ag and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, 1965 etc. ..... admittedly, the petitioners are also granted with cl-2 retail licenses to sell liquor and they are challenging the notification dated 29.03.2016 and licenses granted in favour of the 5th respondent stating they are contrary to the provisions of the act and rule 12 of the rules. .....