Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: foreigners act 1946 section 1 short title and extent Page 1 of about 12,741 results (0.318 seconds)

Mar 26 1969 (SC)

Rev. Mons Sebastiao Fransisco Xavier Dos Remedios Monterio Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC329; 1970CriLJ499a; (1969)3SCC419; [1970]1SCR87

..... acts so extended were the citizenship act of 1955, the foreigners act 1946 and the registration of foreigners act ..... order, and in consequence was prosecuted under section 14 read with section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act. ..... with the title and extent and commencement of the act and gives certain ..... the application of the foreigners act, the registration of foreigners act and the orders passed under ..... every person who or either of whose parents or any of whose grand-parents was born before twentieth day of december, 1961, in the territories now comprised in the union territory of goa, daman and diu shall be deemed to have become a citizen of india on that day :provided that any such person shall not be deemed to have become a citizen of india as aforesaid if within one month from the ..... conventions : in the relations between the powers who are bound by the hague conventions respecting the laws and customs of war on land, whether that of 29th july, 1899, or that of 18th october, 1907, and who are parties to the present convention, this last convention shall be supplementary to sections ii and iii of the regulations annexed to the above-mentioned conventions of the hague.19. ..... in short, the contention is that occupation does not come to end by annexation and, therefore, the protection continues till there is either cession of the territory or withdrawal of the occupying power from the territory, both of which events ..... goa was occupied by the indian armed forces following a short military action. .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 19 1965 (HC)

A.H. Magermans Vs. S.K. Ghose and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1966Cal552,70CWN82

..... the object of the notification was to entrust to various state governments the functions of the central government under, inter alia, rule 3 of the registration of foreigners rules, 1939, and also the powers under clauses (c), (cc), (d) and (f) of subsection (2) of section 3 of the foreigners act, 1946, and under the foreigners order, 1948. ..... 5, contended that the several decisions of the supreme court discussed above, and relied upon by the appellant, did not support his contention that section 3(2)(c) of the foreigners act, 1946, should be struck down on the ground of excessive delegation of power. ..... the legislative policy with regard to the entry, stay and departure of foreigners from this country has been sufficiently indicated both in the preamble and in section 3 and section 3a of the foreigners act, 1946. ..... that in the decision of the supreme court mentioned above, the entrustment made by the presidential notification had the effect of investing the commissioners with the functions of the central government under the land acquisition act, 1894, and the notification was regarded as a notification having the effect of law because to the extent of the entrustment to the commissioners the land acquisition act was amended. ..... the appellant thereafter was employed by several other commercial undertakings in calcutta and while serving such employees, he obtained several short extensions of his stay in india. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 14 2003 (HC)

Premavathy @ Rajathi Vs. State of Tamil Nadu Rep. by Secretary to Gove ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2004CriLJ1475; 2004(2)CTC10

..... 4(1) of the foreigners act, 1946 to confine and detain foreigners had become invalid on the passing of the constitution because of articles 21 and 22 and, therefore, to bring this part of the law into the line with the constitution, section 3(1)(b) preventive detention act, 1950 was enacted. ..... it is submitted that the national security act, 1980 is a special enactment on the subject which covers the field and the same shall prevail over the foreigners act, 1946.' 16.1. ..... the inference that the two provisions operate in the common field and, therefore, the foreigners act becomes eclipsed or otiose or nullified, in our opinion, is a law which is too broadly stated. ..... it also noted that the validity of the foreigners act was upheld by the supreme court and, therefore, it was obvious that what was being done was under a valid law justifying the interference with the person's life or personal liberty. ..... kumar went up to the extent of saying even the supreme court had not considered the effect of sec. ..... in short, the two acts, viz. ..... in short, the contention of the learned counsel is that the decision in kalavathy's case is sub silentio on the question of sec. ..... shortly, stated the contention boils down to the proposition that because of sec. ..... in short, the learned public prosecutor refutes the charge that the petitioners are kept in special camp or in inhuman conditions inside the special camp. ..... in short, all the petitioners are involved in serious crimes. 4. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Ramagouda Narasagouda Patil Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

M/s.sarovara Wines Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Shamiulla Shadaguppi Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Shri.raghaendra S/o Devanna @ Devendra Kamblekar Vs. The State Of Karn ...

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Manjunath S/o Ramayya Ilager Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

Nagaraj D Jannu Vs. The State Of Karnataka,

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 15 2021 (HC)

M/s.lotus Wine Shop Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka Dharwad

..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act, ..... and sri vinayaka s kulkarni, aga for r1 to r5, sri h m patil and sri vithal s teli, advocate for r7, r6 served) this writ petition is filed under articles 226 and 227 of the constitution of india praying to strike down rule 3(11-c) of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 by declaring the same as violative of section 71(2)(e) of the karnataka excise act ..... (1) scc574while examining the validity of rule 3 (11) of the rules which specifies that a licensee either for manufacture or sale of liquor is prohibited from selling liquor to any other than the holder of distributor licence and the holder of such a licence can only be a company owned or controlled by the state government has held that the right to carry on any occupation, trade or business does not extend to carry on the ..... licence from the competent authority under the provisions of the karnataka excise (sale of indian and foreign liquors) rules, 1968 (for short `rules ). ..... section 71 of the karnataka excise act, 1965 (for short `act ) empowers the state government to make rules to carry out the purposes of this act .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //