Footnote - Judgments | SooperKanoon

Feb 20 1961 (FN)

Monroe Vs. Pape

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Feb-20-1961

..... accessory in such riot in an action in any court of competent jurisdiction footnote 39 id 704 705 footnote 40 id 725 footnote 41 that if any house tenement cabin shop building barn or granary shall ..... municipal regulatory ordinance was state action for purposes of federal district court arising under jurisdiction footnote 3 26 the mayor and other officials of jersey city were charged with a concerted .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 17 1968 (FN)

Jones Vs. Alfred H. Mayer Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-17-1968

..... proposals have not been considered seriously by any legislative body maslow robison supra at 408 footnotes omitted footnote 3 64 in contrast the bill was repeatedly and vehemently attacked in the face of ..... combined to drive them out of their communities ante at 392 u s 427 428 footnote 3 45 footnotes omitted as was pointed out in the discussion of the senate debates supra at 392 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 1972 (FN)

Furman Vs. Georgia

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-29-1972

..... change mistaken judgments may be corrected and refinements perfected in england footnote 8 60 and canada footnote 8 61 critical choices were made after studies canvassing all competing views and in those ..... permitted when abolition even though not absolute flows from constitutional adjudication footnote 8 63 president s commission on law enforcement and administration of justice the challenge of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 1973 (FN)

San Antonio Indep. Sch. Dist. Vs. Rodriguez

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-21-1973

..... also suspect for example those based upon national origin footnote 2 4 alienage footnote 2 5 indigency footnote 2 6 or illegitimacy footnote 2 7 moreover quite apart from the equal protection ..... particular case the highly suspect character of classifications based on race footnote 4 63 nationality footnote 4 64 or alienage footnote 4 65 is well established the reasons why such classifications call .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 30 1976 (FN)

Buckley Vs. Valeo

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-30-1976

..... factual demonstration that the public financing system invidiously discriminates against nonmajor parties footnote 132 in 1912 theodore roosevelt ran as the candidate of the progressive party which ..... no constitutional challenge to the provisions either on first or fifth amendment grounds footnote 147 our responses to the certified constitutional questions pertaining to public financing of presidential .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 26 1962 (FN)

Baker Vs. Carr

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Mar-26-1962

..... others may be page 369 u s 347 accounted for by various economic footnote 5 9 political footnote 5 10 and geographic footnote 5 11 considerations no allegation is made by the appellants that the ..... carpenter the development of american political thought 1930 hereafter carpenter 45 46 footnote 4 36 ogg 258 footnote 4 37 seymour 51 footnote 4 38 the federalist no 56 wright ed 1961 at 382 compare .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 24 1982 (FN)

Nixon Vs. Fitzgerald

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-24-1982

..... rejected a constitutionally based separation of powers argument for immunity for federal officials footnote 3 28 surely the fact that officers of the court have been the primary beneficiaries ..... of the judicial process we looked to objective qualities and not subjective purpose footnote 3 35 the majority seems to suggest that responsibility for governmental reorganizations is one such .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 29 1973 (FN)

CBS Vs. Democratic Nat'l Committee

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: May-29-1973

..... or disruptive we might judge these ideas to be footnotes omitted footnote 3 12 if eastern european experience since world war ii ..... all that we may lose is some of our apathy footnote 4 49 footnote 4 1 see business executives move for vietnam peace 25 ..... overriding interest in exercising absolute control over his frequency footnote 4 38 such an analysis however hardly reflects the delicate balancing .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 06 1976 (FN)

Cantor Vs. Detroit Edison Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jul-06-1976

..... 47 48 in parker v brown o t 1942 no 46 footnote omitted footnote 3 7 this distinction was properly drawn as is apparent from ..... purposes of the fourteenth amendment id at 419 u s 357 footnote omitted footnote 32 nor is such a conclusion even arguably inconsistent with the ..... scheme but it certainly has not done so as yet footnote 2 6 footnote 2 1 the court expressly stated in schwegmann the fact .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 28 1977 (FN)

Nixon Vs. Administrator of General Services

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-28-1977

..... the supremacy of the executive branch within its assigned area of constitutional responsibilities footnote 11 but distinguished a president s broad undifferentiated claim of public interest in ..... a rational relationship between the underlying statute and the admittedly permissible state objectives footnote 4 24 the initial interest in preserving the materials for judicial purposes has diminished .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Footnote - Judgment Search Results