Food Product - Judgment Search Results

Rani Food Products Vs. Stine Food Products

Court: Chennai

new customers. The trade of masala, curry powder and other food items dealt with by the plaintiff/applicant is a highly competitive change of ownership filed) 6. 698270 RANI Jams Santhi Food Products In support of this submission, the respondent has referred to

National Food Products Vs. Madras Food Products and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1993(1)BomCR105

phonetic comparison whether the resemblance between the infringed or infringing product is such as can be said to be deceptively similar

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Ampro Food Products Limited

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: [1995]96STC617(AP)

Syed Shah Mohammed Quadri, J.1. These three tax revision cases arise out of the orders of assessment of the turnover...

Adhunik Food Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC324

the Hon'ble High Court held that admittedly barley is a food grain, so is malt, malt or malted barley is barley not sustainable in regard to classification on chiranjidana. All the product, on the other hand, are classifiable under sub-heading 1704.90 as

Sonal Food Products and ors. Vs. State Through Food Inspector (Pfa), G ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2009(93)DRJ273

decision of the Supreme Court in the case of Pepsi Food (supra), I direct that the complaint as well as the the parties. It is also revealed that M/s Sonal Food Products is a partnership concern in which Shri Devi Das Garg

Lords Food Products (India) Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Orissa State Financ ...

Court: Orissa

Reported in: AIR2002Ori156

This decision was communicated to the writ petitioner M/s. Lords Food Products, by the Joint General Manager (Recovery) of the O.S.F.C. of India towards its working capital. It started its commercial production on 26-2-1988, but for various reasons, the unit became sick

Sankalp Food Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2003)(155)ELT166Tri(Mum.)bai

where there were pigs learnt the advantage of consuming cooked food in place of raw food, the submission of Mr. Kanta cooking, dissolving or boiling in water, milk, etc. The impugned product has been denied exemption holding it as protein concentrates.There is

Adhunik Food Products (P) Ltd., U.P. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excis ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2007(117)ECC296; 2007LC296(SC); 2007(211)ELT360(SC); JT2007(8)SC338; 2007(6)SCALE22; (2007)9SCC32; 2007(1)LC605(SC)

to the assessee puffed soya nuts is a soya based food preparation under item No.25 of the Notification No.2 of 1994 period to ICDS, Haryana and the quantity of the said product sold by the assessee during the said period to public

Ramdev Food Products Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Arvindbhai Rambhai Patel and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2006SC3304; 2006(6)ALD36(SC); 2007(1)ALLMR(SC)402; (2007)1GLR594; JT2006(8)SC393; 2006(33)PTC281(SC); 2006(8)SCALE631; (2006)8SCC726

misinterpreted the provisions of the 1958 Act vis--vis Prevention of Food Adulteration Act and Standards of Weights and Measures Act, as expensive pianos are not as vulnerable to confusion as to products as hasty buyers of inexpensive merchandise at a newsstand or

Sunrise Food Products Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2006)(110)ECC530

retiring Member of CESTAT in the case of M/s Sanket Food Products Pvt. Ltd. dropped the demand of more than Rs. that demand confirmed in the case of M/s. Sanket Food Products Pvt. Ltd. was set aside by the Tribunal vide order