Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: food corporations act 1964 section 18 capital of state food corporation Court: kolkata Page 11 of about 214 results (1.067 seconds)

Sri Biswanath Neogi Vs. Director and Inspector General of Police and o ...

Court : Kolkata

..... became final on 24th april, 2001 implemented.23. since much emphasis was laid by learned counsel mr. gupta, on the judgment of the apex court in the case of food corporation of india (supra), the same deserves to be appreciated in its proper perspective. the respondents before the apex court being the writ petitioner, s.n. nagarkar, filed a ..... being order dated 16.2.1999 was challenged by way of 'letters patent appeal'. the same was dismissed by order dated 30th april, 1999. this prompted the food corporation of india to approach the apex court. the apex court while dealing with the matter took into consideration the various aspects as dealt with by the learned writ court ..... any proceeding under article 226 of the constitution.22. then what should be the remedy left for the aggrieved person. for the inbuilt restrictions in the contempt of court acts, it could not be possible for the applicant to get the relief. thus, he could not enjoy the benefit of an order passed in his favour. but can .....

Luxmi Chand Rustogi, Etc. and ors. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta and anr ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1980CriLJ22

..... . none appears at the hearing in support of the appeals. any way, we have gone through the records and heard the learned advocates appearing on behalf of the corporation of calcutta as well as of the state.5. it has been stated on behalf of the respondents that p.w. 1 amitava sarkar went to the shop of ..... the contention put forward on behalf of the respondent. we hold that the charge under section 7 read with section 16(1)(a)(i) of the prevention of food adulteration act has not been established against the accused appellants.13. criminal appeals nos. 359 and 364 of 1973 are allowed. the conviction and sentences of imprisonment imposed upon the ..... public analyst, who reported the same to be adulterated. both the accused appellants were prosecuted under section 7 read with section 16(1)(i) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954.2. the defence was that it was non-edible oil, which was perfumed oil and not meant for human consumption.3. the learned senior municipal magistrate believed .....

Ram Pratap Brij Mohan and ors. Vs. the State of West Bengal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1980CriLJ266

..... pratap brij mohan must fail.3. mr. p. ghosh, appearing on behalf of the corporation of calcutta has fairly conceded that there is substance in the arguments advanced by mr. roy.4. section 20a of the prevention of food adulteration act reads as follows:20-a, where at any time during the trial of any offence ..... error in taking cognizance of the case. if necessary subsequently he can take necessary action according to the provision of section 20-a of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954. it 'has thus been stated that the present proceeding against the accused amritlal pandey, harekrishna sarogi, raj kumar saraf, krishna kumar sarogi and ..... j.1. shri s. n. ghosh, food inspector, corporation of calcutta (opposite party no. 2) filed a petition of complaint in the court of the learned metropolitan magistrate, 2nd court. town hall, calcutta, against eight persons under sections 7 and 16(1)(a)(i) of the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954. the learned magistrate perused the petition .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2009)IVLLJ850Cal

..... the industrial dispute was raised which was ultimately referred to the labour court. the point of reference is quoted below:whether the refusal by the zonal manager, food corporation of india, 10, middleton row, calcutta-700071 to pay overtime wages at one and half times the ordinary rates of wages to the workmen of calcutta complex ..... . chatterjee, learned senior counsel being assisted by mr. kamal kumar chattopadhyay appearing for fci being the appellant above named contended that the provisions of the said act of 1963 clearly mentioned that overtime at the prescribed rate would only be available to the concerned employee once he had worked for the normal, hours. the ..... oxygen ltd. v. their workmen (supra) and workmen of the calcutta electric supply corporation ltd. v. calcutta electric supply corporation ltd. (supra) in this regard.19. the problem can be viewed from another angle. section 9a of the said act of 1947 inter alia provides that an employer is not entitled to alter the service .....

Manoshi Moholanobish Vs. Kolkata Municipal Corporation and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 2007(4)CHN233

..... india : air1986sc872 ; r.k. kaura v. municipal commr., mcd and ors. 2005 (11) scc 524; lt. col. p.r. chaudhuary v. municipal corporation of delhi : (2000)4scc577 ; food corporation of india v. state of punjab 2001(1) scc 291; municipal council, khurai and anr. v. kamal kumar and anr. : [1965]2scr653 .3. learned ..... abasan co-operative society in kolkata, has challenged the action of the kolkata municipal corporation (for short 'the corporation') in issuing notices for hearing under sections 184(3) and 184(4) of the kolkata municipal corporation act, 1980 ('the act' for short) for assessment of the annual valuation for the first quarter 1998-99 ..... advocate appearing on behalf of the kolkata municipal corporation submitted that though the petitioner was in occupation of her flat, no return was filed which was in violation of section 178(5) of the act .....

Biswanath Dutta Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2004)1CALLT458(HC)

..... b. bhattacharyya, j.1. by this writ application, the writ petitioner, a daily rated employee of food corporation of india (hereinafter referred to 'fci'), has prayed for direction upon the respondents to allow him to perform his duty as group 'd' staff and farther direction upon ..... qualification. it was further decided that the casual employees who did not fulfill the conditions of appointment should be retrenched by paying retrenchment compensation as required under industrial disputes act, 1947. there is no dispute that the petitioner was appointed as full time casual on daily basis on august 10, 1987 after the aforesaid cut off date and ..... his usual duty under fci though no formal order of terminating the service of the petitioner was issued nor was any compensation for retrenchment paid in terms of industrial disputes act.6. the aforesaid admitted facts indicate that from august 10, 1987 till 3rd october 2002, the petitioner continuously worked as daily rated group 'd' staff under fci .....

Om Prakash Shaw Vs. Raniganj Municipality and anr.

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1989CriLJ1793

..... surpapers scrutinised, consented and signed.p1. prosecute.we are inclined to think that the said revision having been heard ex parte without any one representing the municipal corporation or the state, the attention of the learned judge was not duly drawn to these evidence, both oral and documentary and we have no doubt that if ..... or further materials or evidence on record. and once such a written consent is accorded for the prosecution of an offence under the prevention of food adulteration act for dealing in adulterated food, there should be no doubt that the authority was satisfied that the prosecution for such an anti-social offence, not a mere mala prohibita ..... details and it was also stated in paragraph 7 of that petition that 'the food inspector duly submitted the records of the said inspection along with report of the public analyst to the chief health officer of t he calcutta municipal corporation, the local (health) authority and after applying his mind gave written consent to .....

G. Atherton and Co. (Pvt.) Ltd. and ors. Vs. Corporation of Calcutta

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 1979CriLJ86

..... directors and petitioner no. 7 is the godown keeper of the said company at 21, r. n. mukherjee road, calcutta.2. on dec. 23, 1975 one food inspector of the corporation of calcutta by the name of dr. b. rai chowdhuri inspected the godown of the company at the aforesaid premises and seized from the petitioner no. 7 thirty ..... the petitioners, has submitted before us that the petition of complaint on the face of it, does not disclose any offence under the prevention of food adulteration act, 1954 or the rules framed thereunder (hereinafter the act and the rules) and as such, the cognizance taken by the learned magistrate is bad in law. mr. dutta further submitted that under ..... responsible to the company for the conduct of the company's business, as well as the company, are liable to be proceeded with for an offence committed under the act or the rules. in the instant cam, according to mr. dutta, in the petition of complaint on the basis of which the learned magistrate took cognizance, there is .....

Panghat Sarees Pvt. Ltd. Vs. “panghat” and Ors.

Court : Kolkata

..... interim order in this regard. the learned senior counsel has relied upon the following decision: air1965bom 35,1964 (66) bomlr612(consolidated foods corporation versus brandon & company pvt.ltd.). (2005) 3 supreme court cases (dhariwal industries ltd.& anr. versus m.s.s.food products; 2004(12) scc624baker hughes ltd.& anr. versus hiroo khushlani & anr. mr.saha, learned ..... products and on that basis the court have directed the parties to maintain separate account. in my view, a mere advertisement made in 1996 cannot act as a shield in an action brought for infringement and passing of when the fact remains that the plaintiff has adopted the mark in the year ..... the petition which reads as follows: [b].an order of injunction restraining the respondent by themselves, their men, servants, agents, assigns and all other persons acting on their behalf from infringing the petitioner s registered trademark panghat sarees by using the impugned trade name panghat or any other trade name and/or trading .....

Vikram Murarka and anr. Vs. Assessor-collector (North-south) Division ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (2006)2CALLT30(HC)

..... 9. notice which suffers from vagueness and lacks material particulars, cannot be sustained in law:(i) : (2000)4scc577 (lt. col. p.r. chaudhary v. municipal corporation of delhi),(ii) (2001) 1 scc 291 (food corporation of india v. state of punjab) and(iii) : [1980]122itr38(sc) (commissioner of gift tax, bombay v. smt. kusum ben d. mahadevia).9. ..... the legality and/or validity of the said notice, the scheme for assessment of the annual valuation of a premises as provided in the kolkata municipal corporation act, 1980, is required to be considered.17. the determination of the annual valuation of a premises is made under section 174 of the said ..... given to the petitioners by the municipal authorities.28. such submission of mr. dutta is absolutely contrary to the scheme as provided in section 184 of the said act under which the municipal authorities are not required to supply those material particulars to any individual assessee separately along with the notice of hearing either under section 184( .....