Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: food corporations act 1964 section 11 advisory committees Court: orissa Page 1 of about 382 results (0.107 seconds)

Nakul Kishor Merli and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2002Ori174

..... to be purchased at that price. it is a support price. food corporation of india has come into existence under the food corporations act, 1964 and under section 13. of that act, it shall be the primary duty of the corporation to undertake the purchase, storage, movement, transport, distribution and sale of food-grains, and other foodstuffs. the corporation is also expected to promote, by such mens as it thinks ..... fit, the production of food-grains and other foodstuffs. but procurement of food-grains would necessarily involve .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. Sales Tax Officer and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [1990]78STC58(Orissa)

..... dealer under the act and the rules framed thereunder. the petitioner is assessed to sales tax by the sales tax officer ..... of the orissa sales tax act, 1947 (for short 'the act') fall for adjudication in these cases.3. shorn of unnecessary details, the factual antecedents are that the petitioner is a government of india undertaking and a corporation established under the food corporation act, 1964 (union act 37 of 1964) (for short 'the act 37 of 1964') and is registered as a ..... sales tax officer wherefrom the return admitted tax can be computed not to have been paid. in the instant case the returns filed by the food corporation of india did not indicate a higher amount of admitted tax but only 3 per cent purchase tax to be paid on the basis of the .....

Jagdish Prasad Gupta Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 52(1981)CLT558; 1982CriLJ113

..... into a sift which is not contemplated by the law in a case where the food inspector purchases the goods for analysis.the supreme court in municipal corporation of delhi v. laxmi narain tandon : 1976crilj547 , while discussing about supply or offer of food by a hotelier to a customer has observed that if the expression 'store' in ..... stated at the time of sale that it was intended for external use only.the supreme court has further held that in order to be 'food' for the purposes of the act, an article need not be 'fit for human consumption; it need not be described or exhibited as intended for human consumption, it may even ..... section 7 means 'storing for sale', the provisions of the prevention of food adulteration act come into operation. section 7 prohibits a .....

Food Corporation of India Vs. M/S. Jai Maa Kali Stores

Court : Orissa

..... 184 & 185 of 2012 from a common order dated 03.03.2012 passed by the learned single judge in oj.nos.8141, 8148 and 8151 of 1997. __________ food corporation of india (in all the three appeals) . appellants -versusm/s. jai maa kali stores (in wa no.183/2012) m/s haryana trading co. (in wa ..... 03.2012 passed in oj.nos.8141, 8148 and 8151 of 2 1997 instituted by the respondent-writ petitioners herein questioning the appellant food corporation of india s (for short, hereinafter referred to as the corporation .) demand for differential price in connection with sale of wheat under the open market sale scheme (for short, omss .) for ..... commission agents dealing with essential commodities and have been granted food grains licence under the provisions of the essential commodities act, 1955 and the rules framed thereunder. according to them, the headquarters of the food corporation of india, new delhi (for short hereinafter referred to as the fci/corporation .) by its fax/telex message dated 25.10.1996 .....

Lohia Industries Vs. Food Inspector, Cuttack Municipal Corporation and ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2003CriLJ4664; 2003(II)OLR191

..... all the documents including the cash-memo accompanying the tanker that the mustard oil was unrefined. on 8-9-1998 the tanker was seized by the food inspector of cuttack municipal corporation near gopalpur and after collecting the sample of the unrefined mustard oil, he sent the same to the public analyst, orissa, for analysis. although the ..... the petitioner, to the learned sub-divisional judicial magistrate, sadar cuttack to send the sample of the seized mustard oil to the central food laboratory for examination under the provisions of the food adulteration act, 1954 and the rules made thereunder. by order dated 12-1-1999, the learned magistrate rejected the prayer because he doubted the ..... was nominated on 1-11-1990 was made known by the petitioner in his letter dated 27-11-1990.6. for the reasons aforesaid, the learned magistrate acted illegally in exercise of jurisdiction in not acceding to the prayer made by the nominee of the petitioner to send the sample of mustard oil to the .....

Satyanarayan Bhandar Vs. State of Orissa and ors.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : (2007)5VST83(Orissa)

..... been interfered with.10. reliance has been placed by the learned counsel for the petitioner on the 10 judgment in the case of m. n. nilugal v. district manager, food corporation of india, district office, hubli/raichur reported in [2005] 142 stc 229 (karn). the question in that case was whether (a) damaged wheat to be used as cattle ..... fall under entry 15 of the fifth schedule or under section 5(1) of the karnataka sales tax act, 1957. the court found on facts that the petitioner was buying and selling damaged foodgrains, wheat and rice from the food corporation of india. the court found on admitted facts of that case that what was sold by fci is ..... learned counsel for the petitioner also placed reliance on the decision in the case of deputy commissioner of sales tax (law), board of revenue (taxes), ernakulam v. pio food packers reported in [1980] 46 stc 63 (sc). in that case the question was whether pineapple fruit is consumed for the purpose of manufacturing pineapples slices. the court .....

Sidheswar Kanungo. Vs. Food Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... arrears of differential salary.2. bereft of unnecessary details, the facts and circumstances giving rise to the present writ petition are that the petitioner joined the services of food corporation of india on 27.06.1973 as assistant grade-3 (general) in the district office, balasore. during the year 1994, some of the juniors of the ..... a government servant against the adverse entries the competent authority is not under any obligation to record reasons. but the competent authority has no licence to act arbitrarily, he must act in a fair and just manner. he is required to consider the questions raised by the government servant and examine the same, in the light ..... , held as under:- "the principle is well-settled that in accordance with the rules of natural justice, an adverse report in a confidential roll cannot be acted upon to deny promotional opportunities unless it is communicated to the person concerned so that he has an opportunity to improve his work and conduct or to explain .....

Superintending Engineer (investigation Circle), National Water Develop ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1994(II)OLR480

..... had been given to or served on the party in person. similar view was also expressed by the apex court in indian revon corporation ltd. v. raunag and company pvt. ltd.: air 1988 sc 2054; and food corporation of india and ors. v. e. kuttapoan : air 1993 sc 2629.5. in the case at hand as the fact situation ..... in the interest of justice while dealing with such matters. hence no formal application or written application is necessary. the discretion under section 5 of the limitation act is to be judicial discretion and not arbitrary one. if under explainable circumstances an appeal or application is filed but without a formal application or written application indicating ..... circumstances the court should not have rejected it on the ground that it was filed belatedly. according to him, absence of petition under section 5 of the limitation act was not relevant. the learned counsel for landlord on the other hand submitted that the period of limitation runs from the date of knowledge of filing of the .....

Food Corporation of India Workers' Union Vs. Food Corporation of India ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 99(2005)CLT150; (2005)IILLJ753Ori; 2005(I)OLR205

..... or currency notes and not in cheque.14. the aforesaid discussion would show that under section 6 of the payment of wages act, 1936 and section 11 of the minimum wages act, 1948 the food corporation of india is under a legal duty to pay wages averaging less than rupees sixteen hundred a month and the minimum wage in ..... him to ensure encashment of cheques and payment thereof to avoid attraction of the penal provisions of the payment of wages act, 1936. many of the employees also addressed representations to different district managers of the food corporation of india indicating their difficulties in receiving payment of their wages by cheques. the petitioner-union has filed w.p.(c ..... section (2) of section 11 authorisinj||)ayf!|ent of minimum wages either wholly or partly in kind. thus the food corporation of india is under a statutory duty under section 11 to pay minimum wages under the minimum wages act, 1948 in cash and not in kind. but this provision in sub-section (1) of section 11 has .....

Balangir District Rice Mill Association and anr. Vs. State of Orissa a ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR2002Ori12

..... counter affidavit stating therein that the state government makes policy decision called 'the procurement policy' of each year for procurement of levy rice arid the food corporation of india procures and stoles the same for subsequent distribution under various schemes. the state government keeping in view the availability of godown space and ..... this writ application challenging the policy decision of the government, fixing and creating a target for the khariff year 2000-2001 for procurement of rice by the food corporation of india from different districts allegedly in violation of the orissa rice and paddy procurement (levy) and restriction on sale & movement order, 1982 (hereinafter ..... is that the orders framed under section 3 of the essential commodities act neither provide or prescribe fixation of a target nor envisages confirment of any power on the state government or the collector of a district or the food corporation of india to fix any target restricting the trade or purchase of .....