First Impression - Judgment Search Results

M/S. Impression Prints Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

application No.E/Stay/1708/2000 NB in Appeal No.E/2968/2000 NB filed by M/s. Impression Prints, the Tribunal had directed the appellants to pre-deposit a

impression Prints Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3980; 2005(102)ECC1; 2005(187)ELT170(SC); JT2005(7)SC585; (2005)7SCC497

packing is done; that PVC sheeting received in thans was first cut and thereafter printed on tables and packed. Shri Ganga It must be mentioned that in the beginning we were impressed by Mr. Bagaria's submissions. However we find that the authorities

DolphIn Impressions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT123Tri(Mum.)bai

date.The government as a transitional measure, notified that insofar as first Rs. 10 lakhs worth of clearances 'nil' duty be paid

Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

on use of a descriptive term simply by grabbing it first. Canal Co. v. Clark , supra , at 323324, 327. all but footnote 6. KP Permanent Make-Up, Inc. v. Lasting Impression I, Inc. - 03-409 (2004) OPINION OF THE COURT KP

S.B.P. Anand Mohan Vs. Graphic Impressions (Madras)

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2004)120CompCas265

company controlled by a director holding majority shares of the first company is oppressive. In the meanwhile, the respondents prevented the cent of the issued and paid-up capital in M/s. Graphic Impressions (Madras) Limited ('the Company') has filed this petition under Section

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Impress Ad-aids and Displays

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT137Tri(Bang.)

1. By this appeal Revenue is challenging the correctness of the Order-in-Appeal No. 496/2000-C.E., dated 6-9-2000 by which the Commissioner...

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Impressive Computer Systems Pvt.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT104Tri(Mum.)bai

1. This appeal is filed by the revenue against the order-in-appeal passed by the Commissioner (Appeals). The dispute relates to...

Commnr. of Central Excise, Kolkatta-i Vs. Web Impression India Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Arijit Pasayat, J.1. Challenge in this appeal is to the judgment of Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal, Eastern...

In the Matter of Multi Impression Carbons Private Ltd(vol. Liqn.) Vs.. ...

Court: Delhi

1956 for voluntary winding up of the company namely, MULTI IMPRESSION CARBONS PRIVATE LTD(VOL. LIQN.) 2. The Company has passed a

M/s. Add Print (India) Enterprises Private Limited by its Manager, Ker ...

Court: Chennai

is a unique product with modern quality, which gives 30000 impressions of the stamp. The sales turn over was increased from