First Impression - Judgment Search Results

Commissioner of C. Ex. Vs. Impress Ad-aids and Displays

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2004)(173)ELT137Tri(Bang.)

1 by this appeal revenue is challenging the correctness of the order in appeal no 496 2000 c e dated...

The Commissioner of Central Vs. Impressive Computer Systems Pvt.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT104Tri(Mum.)bai

1 this appeal is filed by the revenue against the order in appeal passed by the commissioner appeals the dispute...

impression Prints Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Delhi-1

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR2005SC3980; 2005(102)ECC1; 2005(187)ELT170(SC); JT2005(7)SC585; (2005)7SCC497

..... submissions it must be mentioned that in the beginning we were impressed by mr bagaria s submissions however we find that the authorities ..... manufacture of refined oil which fell within item 23 of the first schedule to the central excises and salt act bearing the description ..... and packing is done that pvc sheeting received in thans was first cut and thereafter printed on tables and packed shri ganga ram .....

Kp Permanent Make-up, Inc. Vs. Lasting Impression I, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... on advertising flyers and since 1991 on pigment bottles respondents lasting impression i inc and its licensee mcn international inc lasting for simplicity ..... on use of a descriptive term simply by grabbing it first canal co v clark supra at 323 324 327 the lanham ..... on trade marks of the house committee on patents 77th cong 1st sess 167 168 1941 hereinafter hearings testimony of prof milton handler .....

In the Matter of Multi Impression Carbons Private Ltd(vol. Liqn.) Vs.. ...

Court: Delhi

2019 co pet 4 2019 in the matter of multi impression carbons private ltd vol liqn petitioner through mr deepak anand

M/S. Impression Prints Vs. Cce, New Delhi

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

appeal no e 2968 2000 nb filed by m s impression prints the tribunal had directed the appellants to pre deposit

S.B.P. Anand Mohan Vs. Graphic Impressions (Madras)

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2004)120CompCas265

..... 14 83 per cent of the issued and paid up capital in m s graphic impressions madras limited the company has filed this petition under section 397 398 of the companies ..... from the company to another company controlled by a director holding majority shares of the first company is oppressive in the meanwhile the respondents prevented the petitioner from carrying on his .....

M/s. Add Print (India) Enterprises Private Limited by its Manager, Ker ...

Court: Chennai

is a unique product with modern quality which gives 30000 impressions of the stamp the sales turn over was increased from

DolphIn Impressions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT123Tri(Mum.)bai

determining the duty liability after giving the allowance for the first 10 00 000 worth of clearances 5 the appellants contention

Digital Prints and Impressions Vs. Commr. of Cus.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2005)(188)ELT118Tri(Bang.)

t 313 tribunal has held that classification has to be first determined according to the terms of heading and relative section