First Imposition - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: first imposition Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 23,348 results (0.127 seconds)Farrukhabad Investment (i) Ltd. Vs. Joint Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-27-2002
Reported in: (2003)85ITD230(Delhi)
..... it was stated that section 275 1 c has two parts the first part provides a time limit for imposition of penalty within financial year in which the proceedings in the course ..... been considered by the ao cit a for imposition of penalties under section 271d 271e in different assessment years show cause notice was first issued on 14th dec 1998 thus there cannot .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAlabama Vs. Shelton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: May-20-2002
..... states attempts to impose effective probationary punishment a more workable solution he contends would permit imposition of a suspended sentence on an uncounseled defendant and require appointment of counsel if at ..... a library book within 30 days and fishing on sunday ibid but they also include first offense minor retail theft driving with a suspended license and harassment which includes minor .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBpl Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... market intermediaries in the event of their proven misconduct provision under chapter via provides for imposition of monetary penalty for certain offences specified therein section 24 empowers courts to award ..... we may remind ourselves of the principles in point crystalised by judicial decisions the first of these principles is that disciplinary proceedings before a domestic tribunal are of a .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKensigton Investment Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Oct-11-2002
..... the section though presumes default still cautions the adjudicating officer on imposition of penalty that it means that each and every default ..... cause notice that kensington acquired shares of dsq biotech for the first time on 4th january 2001 when it acquired the said ..... be mentioned that kensington acquired shares of dsq biotech for the first time on january 2001 when it acquired the said 250000 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAtkins Vs. Virginia
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-20-2002
..... consensus for example several organizations with germane expertise have adopted official positions opposing the imposition of the death penalty upon a mentally retarded offender see brief for american ..... s death penalty jurisprudence provides two reasons to agree with the legislative consensus first there is a serious question whether either justification underpinning the death penalty retribution .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRing Vs. Arizona
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-24-2002
..... of an aggravating circumstance before imposition of the death penalty see 13 1105 c first degree murder is a class ..... evidence indicating racial disparities in the charging sentencing and imposition of the death penalty baldus woodworth zuckerman weiner ..... first degree murder the trial judge sitting alone determines the presence or absence of the aggravating factors required by arizona law for imposition .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSatnam Overseas (Export) Through Its Partner Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Ha ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Oct-24-2002
Reported in: AIR2003SC66; JT2002(8)SC573; (2003)1SCC561; [2002]SUPP3SCR271; [2003]130STC107(SC)
..... schedule to the constitution a state is competent to legislate authorising imposition of taxes on the sale or purchase of goods other than ..... the territory of india this clause is also of no consequence firstly because paddy and rice being two different commodities and secondly ..... which is unjust arbitrary and unconstitutional 46 section 15 a was first inserted in the haryana act on january 25 1990 and .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEscorts Mutual Fund Vs. P. Sri Sai Ram, Adjudicating
Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT
Decided on: Jan-04-2002
the audited report thus there was no deprivation of material information from the unit holders as such however sebi s version circumstances like the one stated in the order that non imposition of penalty would send wrong signals to other mutual funds
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNoble Pictures Vs. Joint Cit
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Oct-30-2002
Reported in: (2004)90ITD248(Coch.)
..... months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated whichever period expires later section clearly ..... the above orders of the assessing officer the assessee approached the first appellate authority who dismissed the assessee s appeals by his ..... similar is the case for the assessment year 1991 92 the first appellate already dismissed the assessee s appeal vide para 4 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNoble Pictures Vs. the Jt. Commr. of Income-tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Oct-30-2002
Reported in: (2004)268ITR109(Coch.)
..... months from the end of the month in which action for imposition of penalty is initiated whichever period expires later section clearly ..... the above orders of the assessing officer the assessee approached the first appellate authority who dismissed the assessee s appeals by his ..... similar is the case for the assessment year 1991 92 the first appellate already dismissed the assessee s appeal vide para 4 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial