Skip to content


Find - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: find Year: 1995 Page 1 of about 12,254 results (0.15 seconds)
May 08 1995 (HC)

Hira Lal Vs. D.D.A. and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: May-08-1995

Reported in: 1995IIAD(Delhi)466; 1995(34)DRJ30; 1995LabIC2196

anil dev singh j 1 this is a writ petition whereby the petitioner seeks quashing of the order dated february...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 1995 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Modern Mills Limited

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-06-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT233TriDel

..... of any evidence placed on record in the view we have taken we do not find any substance in the appeal filed by the department and accordingly appeal is dismissed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 19 1995 (TRI)

Deepak Woollen Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-19-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT307TriDel

..... customs bombay who under his order in original dated 23 6 1994 came to a finding of fact that the goods under consideration were not synthetic waste as declared by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 18 1995 (TRI)

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Stallion Shox Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-18-1995

Reported in: (1996)(85)ELT139TriDel

..... conclusion in godfrey philips india ltd case and geep industrial syndicate case turned upon the finding as to the factual situation obtaining therein and the two opinions in ponds india ltd .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 14 1995 (TRI)

Collr. of Central Excise Vs. Assam Timber Treating Works

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-14-1995

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT443TriDel

..... considered to be the normal profit margin that should be applicable we however do not find anything particularly sacred about this 10 it appears to have been adopted as a working .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 13 1995 (TRI)

Kwality Ice Cream Co. Vs. Collector of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-13-1995

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT445TriDel

..... admissible for modvat credit on behalf of the respondent shri p dass sdr reiterated the finding in the impugned order he however conceded that the matter stands settled by the tribunal .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 11 1995 (TRI)

Indian Hume Pipe Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-11-1995

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT172Tri(Chennai)

..... submitted that the tribunal in the impugned order dated 21 12 1994 has given a finding that the declaration filed by the appellant applicant in terms of rule 57g of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 1995 (TRI)

Safari Industries (India) Ltd. Vs. Collector of C. Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-08-1995

Reported in: (1996)(82)ELT298TriDel

..... and place of removal since there are no other inhibiting factors the conclusions and the finding arrived at by the collector are erroneous 8 in the result the impugned order is .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 06 1995 (TRI)

Northern Plastic Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-06-1995

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT132TriDel

..... as a paper cutting machine in this view of the matter we set aside the findings of the adjudicating authority that the machine imported by the appellants is liable to confiscation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1995 (TRI)

Wazir Chand and Co. (P) Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-21-1995

Reported in: (1996)(83)ELT383TriDel

..... warrant for penalty in terms of section 112 a cannot also be accepted as we find that the charge against the appellants is of contravention of section 111 o of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //