Finance No 2 Act 2009 Section 93 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 section 93 Page 1 of about 605 results (4.952 seconds)Sun Investment Pvt Ltd Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of
Court : Delhi
profit and loss account this clause was inserted by the finance 2 act 2009 with retrospective fact from 1 4 2001 ita nos 700 and 701 of 2010 dated 7th may 2010 the division bench approved of the tribunals view that the issued by them under section 148 of the income tax act 1961 hereinafter referred to as act in respect of the rejected by the assessing officer by order dated 4th september 2009 the assessing officer rejected the objections in the following words questionnaire to the petitioner pursuant to the notice issued under section 143 2 on 11 10 2004 a copy of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income Tax, Kolkataiv, Kolkata Vs. M/S. Adhunik Infras ...
Court : Kolkata
section 80 1a of the said act as substituted by finance 2 act 2009 iii whether on the facts and in 80 1a of the said act as substituted by finance 2 act 2009 iii whether on the facts and in the invoking the revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the said act in so far as its claim for deduction under section 09 09 2011 for the impugned assessment year i e 2009 2010 did not satisfy the twin conditions required for invoking in law to allow the claim of deduction made under section 80 1a of the said act without considering the explanation
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Kumar vs.income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.
Court : Delhi
to section 145a with effect from 1st april 2010 by finance 2 act 2009 21 learned counsel for the petitioner however given by the ao in the order dated 8th august 2016 which merely records that on merits the interest component received reasons for issuance of notice u s 148 of it act in your case for a y 2011 12 the reasons 7 of 9 commissioner of income tax v ghanshyam huf 2009 325 itr1 sc hereafter ghanshyam huf would be part of interest component received as enhanced compensation was taxable as per section 56 ix sic viii read with clause b to section
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. D.P. Jain and Company Infrastructure Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India ...
Court : Mumbai
..... 2009 roads exemption from service tax to management maintenance or repair of roads in exercise of the powers conferred by sub section 1 of section 93 of the finance act 1994 32 of 1994 hereinafter referred to as the finance act ..... personal hearing the petitioner vide letter dated 20th may 2014 informed respondent no 2 that the appeal filed by the petitioner against the appellate tribunal s order dated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohabir Enterprises Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court : Chennai
..... original no 20 2012 dated 29 2 2012 levying service tax of rs 47 93 469 with interest penalty etc against which the petitioner filed a statutory appeal under section 85 of the finance act 1994 ..... adjudication proceedings were transferred to the third respondent in terms of notification no 6 2009 service tax dated 30 1 2009 issued by the chief commissioner of central excise chennai zone the counsel .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLombardi Engineering Limited Vs. Uttarakhand Jal Vidyut Nigam Limited
Court : Supreme Court of India
..... see among others morrison v coast finance ltd 1965 55 dlr710 2d b c c a harry v kreutziger ..... is no longer applicable 154 2 scope of judicial review and jurisdiction of the court under sections 8 and 11 of the arbitration act is ..... v singh builders syndicate reported in 2009 4 scc523and north eastern railway v tripple engg works reported in 2014 9 scc288 93 taking note of the aforesaid judgments .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRampyare and ors. Vs. Rampyari
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT89; 2004(4)MPLJ54
summoning order of the magistrate can not be interfered with 22 it is true that unless there is a strong suspicion to comply with the requirements of chapter xi of the act a policy of insurance must be a policy which insures ltd v sarvanlal 2004 4 mpht 404 d b overruled sections 147 96 m p m v rules 1994 rule 97
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Customs (import), Vs. Stoneman Marble Industries, and ...
Court : Supreme Court of India
jawahar customs house nhava sheva and reducing it to rs 25 00 000 and rs 7 00 000 and with penalties act and penalty levied under section 112 a of the act 5 aggrieved the importers approached the tribunal in appeal the 1 01 crores and rs 42 84 000 imposed under section 125 by the commissioner of customs jawahar customs house nhava
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.K. Subramania Iyer and ors. Vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair and Six ors.
Court : Supreme Court of India
Reported in : AIR1970SC376; (1969)3SCC64; [1970]2SCR688
it is not likely that he would have given any financial assistance to his parents till he was at least 20 of pecuniary advantage in barnett v cohen and ors 1921 2 k b 461 mccardie j speaking for the court quoted 10 vict ch 93 known as the lord campbell s acts section 2 corresponds to one of the provisions in the two provisions are quite distinct and independent under the former section the damages are made payable to one or the other the english fatal accidents acts 9 and 10 vict ch 93 known as the lord campbell s acts section 2 corresponds
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPitamberdas Dulichand and ors. Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court : Madhya Pradesh
Reported in : [2000]244ITR542(MP)
provisions of the kar vivad samadhan scheme issued under the finance act are read in their true perspective the same would is allowed no costs head note income tax finance no 2 act 1998 kar vivad samadhan scheme deposit of taxpetitioner deposited of the kar vivad samadhan scheme issued under the finance act are read in their true perspective the same would show no 2 act 1998 s 87 indian penal code 1890 section 306 dalveer bhandari harjit singh bedi jj abetment of suicide
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT