Finance No 2 Act 2009 Section 58 - Judgment Search Results

Sun Investment Pvt Ltd Vs. the Assistant Commissioner of

Court : Delhi

..... profit and loss account this clause was inserted by the finance 2 act 2009 with retrospective fact from 1 4 2001 the assessee cannot be ..... who is the respondent no 2 herein issued a questionnaire to the petitioner pursuant to the notice issued under section 143 2 on 11 10 ..... normal provisions of the act the petitioner started the computation from the figure of net loss of rs 28 58 179 as per the .....

Commissioner of Income Tax, Kolkataiv, Kolkata Vs. M/S. Adhunik Infras ...

Court : Kolkata

section 80 1a of the said act as substituted by finance 2 act 2009 iii whether on the facts and in twin conditions required for invoking the revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the said act in so far as its claim invoking the revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 of the said act in so far as its claim for deduction under section of the said act as substituted by finance 2 act 2009 iii whether on the facts and in the circumstances of act in so far as its claim for deduction under section 801a was concerned let requisite number of paper books be

Ram Kumar vs.income Tax Officer, Ward-64(2) & Anr.

Court : Delhi

to section 145a with effect from 1st april 2010 by finance 2 act 2009 21 learned counsel for the petitioner however be taxed in the said assessment year u s 56 2 viii of income tax act 1961 the assessing officer assessed as per section 56 2 viii of the income tax act 1961 in the assessment made on 14 02 2014 u the decision in ghanshyam huf supra is dated 16th july 2009 and the act has been subsequently amended in the form of said assessee for a y 2011 12 as per section 56 2 viii of the income tax act 1961 in

M/S Sudarshan Security Services Vs. C.C.E., Jaipur I

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... 2009 by which the order of the original authority confirming demand of service tax amounting to rs 58 617 along with interest imposing penalties under section 76 77 and 78 of the finance act ..... penalty under section 78 there is no be justification to impose penalty under section 76 3 ..... 2 learned advocate is not disputing the service tax liability or interest liability or penalties under section .....

Present:- Mr. D.S. Pheruman Advocate Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... the state has argued that vide notification dated november 18 2009 issued by ministry of finance under clause vii a and xxiii a of section 2 of the ndps act the entire mixture of any or more of narcotic drugs ..... dated january 29 1993 in the said notification diphenoxylate salt has been mentioned at sr no 58 he has argued that as per the abovesaid notification if the concentration of diphenoxylate salt .....

Hamdard Laboratories India and Another Vs. Assistant Director of Incom ...

Court : Delhi

..... noted we may note here that the first proviso to sub section was amended by finance no 2 act 2009 with retrospective effect from 01 04 2009 the said proviso is applicable in cases where an assessee claims ..... sought to be urged by the revenue specifically in the context of section 10 23c iv and held as follows 58 in conclusion we may say that the expression charitable purpose as defined .....

M/S. Technique Unemployed Engineers Co-operative Society Ltd. Vs. Comm ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Kolkata

..... under section 78 and penalty under section 76 not quantified and rs 5 000 penalty under section 77 2 of finance act 1994 2 at ..... has submitted that the taxable value of rs 1 58 crores had been taken twice resulting into excess ..... cannot be verified at this stage however he has no objection in remanding the case to the ld ..... 2005 to 26 07 2009 major portion of the demand i e around rs 2 07 crores relates to .....

Rampyare and ors. Vs. Rampyari

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 2005(1)MPHT89; 2004(4)MPLJ54

now i proceed to consider criminal revision no 494 99 26 shri agrawal learned counsel appearing for the petitioner complainant submitted for interpreting sections 147 and 145 of the m v act to hold the insurer liable for death or bodily injury ltd v sarvanlal 2004 4 mpht 404 d b overruled sections 147 96 m p m v rules 1994 rule 97

Commissioner of Customs (import), Vs. Stoneman Marble Industries, and ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

bombay dated 3rd july 2003 in customs application nos 27 29 31 34 36 of 2002 and 2 10 of 2003 a reference to the provisions of section 130a of the act which read as follows 130a application to high court 1 was right in law reducing the redemption fine imposed under section 125 of the customs act 1962 from rs 1 01

C.K. Subramania Iyer and ors. Vs. T. Kunhikuttan Nair and Six ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1970SC376; (1969)3SCC64; [1970]2SCR688

it is not likely that he would have given any financial assistance to his parents till he was at least 20 limited strictly to the pecuniary loss to beneficiaries under section 2 measure of damages is economic loss sustained by the estate amount in law to felony or other crime every such action or suit shall be for benefit of the wife husband in ascertaining pecuniary loss caused to the relations mentioned in section 1a it must be borne in mind that these damages