Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: orissa Page 3 of about 908 results (0.053 seconds)

State of Orissa Vs. I.D.L. Chemical (P) Ltd.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : [2006]147STC231(Orissa)

..... : air1985sc1754 and some other decisions of the apex court.8. reference applications were made before this court for the years 1977-78 to 1983-84 in s.j.c. nos. 2 to 8 of 1989. the same were disposed of vide order dated february 11, 1992 and the matters were remanded for inquiry and fresh disposal after consideration of minutes of ..... the quality of the goods that were actually supplied by the appellant to its various purchasers ;(v) that so far as section 3(a) of the central act is concerned there is no distinction between unascertained and future goods and goods which are already in existence, if at the time when the sale takes place these goods have come into actual ..... application for reference under section 24(1) of the o.s.t. act having been rejected by the tribunal, it filed s.j.c. nos. 133, 139 to 146 of 1998 under section 24(2)(b) before this court which were disposed of by order dated september 7, 1999 holding that no question of law arises out of the of the order dated october .....

State Vs. Bharat Chandra Roul

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1995CriLJ2417

..... either from the sources already disclosed by the accused, or from some undisclosed source. a question arose as to whether a voluntary disclosure under section 24 (2) of the finance (no. 2) act, 1965, had to relate to income actually earned by the declarant. that section granted immunity to the declarant alone and not to other persons to whom ..... the income really belonged. it was observed by the apex court in jamnaprasad kanhaiyyalal v. cit : [1981]130itr244(sc) that the legal fiction created by section 24 (3) of the aforesaid act ..... 8, 15 and 21 refer to seven chains. the plea of the accused that there were two containers is not acceptable on that score because serial nos. 2, 14, 20, 3, 13 and 15 in groups would indicate possibility of three containers and not two containers as claimed. therefore, the separate description as .....

Sudarshan Gochhayat. Vs. State of OrissA.

Court : Orissa

..... written objections though they have the knowledge of the notifications/declarations made under section 4 and 6 of the act respectively. there is no document to show that the lands of the petitioner no. 2 and in w.p.(c) no. 10325 of 2008 are sought to be acquired. it is the contention of the beneficiary company that ..... mischief of fraud on public power of the state government and it does not satisfy the mandate of section 25 read with sections 2, 3, 12(2) (b), 13(2) and 27(2) of the act, 1956 and regulations including the statutory annexure annexed thereto. sterlite foundation' first altered its name to vedanta foundation' and still later ..... cum secretary to government, higher education department, r.d.c., central division, secretary to government, works department, special secretary to government, finance department and the collector, puri. the further case of the opposite party nos. 1 to 5 is that most of the lands proposed to be acquired are inferior type, completely rain fed and there is .....

Baikunthanath Jena Vs. State of Orissa and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 69(1990)CLT440; 1990CriLJ2626

..... limitation was removed. the offence alleged against the petitioner and pro forma opposite party no. 2 was complete in the year 1982 prior to the amendment referred to above and so ex facie no court could take cognizance of any offence under the act except on a complaint made within one year from the date of the offence. ..... mohapatra, j.1. the petitioner and pro forma opposite party no. 2 are accused in a case under sections 3 and 4 of the dowry prohibition act (for short the 'act') and have challenged the order of cognizance dated 6-2-1985 passed by the learned sub-divisional judicial magistrate, bhubaneswar.2. prosecution case, which is a very unfortunate one, is narrated ..... a judicial magistrate of the first class shall try any offence under this act;(b) no court shall take cognizance of an offence under this act except upon --(i) its own knowledge or a police report of the facts which constitute such offence; or(ii) a complaint by the person aggrieved by the offence or a parent or .....

Sri Jayadev SwaIn Vs. Vatsala Raghu and anr.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2005(I)OLR699

..... one year from the date of cause of action. the division bench of this court further opined that section 5 of the limitation act has no manner of application to the proceeding under contempt of courts act.4. in the present case, this court directed the opp.parties to appoint the petitioner forthwith on 29.11.2000. construing the same ..... calcutta 375 and ilr 1990 karnatak 3455) was not accepted keeping in mind the provision under article 225 of the constitution read with provision of chapter i of part ii thereof and entry 14 of the concurrent list of the 7th schedule. further, the following decisions of the apex court in barada kanta mishra v. gatikrusha mishra : ..... decision on merits.'in (2000) 3 supreme court cases 171 : om prakash jaiswal v. d.k. mittal and anr..'15. in the cases contemplated by (i) or (ii) above, it cannot be said that any proceedings for contempt have been initiated. filing of an application or petition for initiating proceedings for contempt or a mere receipt of such .....

Raj Exports Vs. National Aluminium Co. Ltd.

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 1996(87)ELT349(Ori)

..... challenging the leviability of duty for which the liability is on the importer (hindustan lever ltd.). the petitioner purchased the licence from nalco and transferred to m/s. indocon finance, new delhi on 30-5-1994 by receiving full and final consideration and in turn this licence was transferred to m/s. metec asia, bombay, on 29-11- ..... as to costs.48. i have gone through the leading judgment of my learned brother the acting chief justice rendered with brevity and clarity. i have no disagreement with the conclusion arrived with regard to the competency of the customs authority, opposite party no. 2, to demand the duty on the goods in question.49. it has been made clear in ..... 1994 by m/s. indocon finance, new delhi and finally to hindustan lever ltd. (the importer) on 7-2-1995 by m/s. metec asia, bombay. these transfers were by payment of full and final consideration and the last transferee, i.e .....

Utkal Chamber of Commerce and Industry Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Oris ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 73(1992)CLT882; 1992(I)OLR530

..... note certain other arguments advanced by the petitioners, is highlighted by them that until finalisation of the minutes under rule 17(2), no finality could be attached to the minutes and, therefore, the government could not have acted upon unconfirmed proceeding of the advisory board. the government proceeded as if there was unanimity amongst the members which was far ..... of consideration by government whereas in the counter-affidavit filed the stand was that the consideration was that of the advisory board, the labour minister, the finance secretary and the labour secretary and rendered approval to the proposal. therefore, they could not be considered to be independent members. the ..... finance secretary had expressed views about the financial viability and the labour minister and the labour secretary were parties to the proposal and, therefore, it cannot be .....

Paradeep Port Trust. Vs. Controlling Authority and ors.

Court : Orissa

..... that the major ports are governed by the industrial dispute (regulation and abolition) act, 1971. it is further contended that the major port trust is covered under the act.6. it is further contended by the opposite party nos.2 to 7 that as per the resolution to agenda no.4 (01)/2006-07 of the paradeep port trust board, a proposal for ..... gratuity or pensionary benefits not less favourable than the benefits conferred under the act. in this case, there is no such plea that ppt has been exempted from payment of grauity by the central government under section 5 of the act. rather the learned counsel for opposite party no.2 to 7 has brought to the notice of the court, a letter issued ..... by the government of india, ministry of transport and shipping (port wing) bearing no.a-29018/1/91 p.e.i, new delhi, dated 19. .....

Utkal Christian Council Vs. State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Reported in : 2009(1)OLR133

..... added).12. black law dictionary 8th edn. defines employment, master and relationship as under:'employment' (page 566) means (1) relationship between master and servant, (2) act of employing, (3) the state of being employed, (4) work for which one have been hired and is being paid by an employer.''master' (page 997 ..... may now sum up our conclusions:(i) the use of the accolade judicial or quasi-judicial to inquiries under the commissions of inquiry act, strictly speaking, is inappropriate.(ii) a quasi-judicial inquiry equally presupposes like a judicial inquiry the existence of a dispute between two or more . parties and investigates and ..... declares the liabilities.(iii) before a commission of inquiry appointed under the act, there is no lis between the parties and no decision prejudicially affecting the rights of .....

Brundaban Chandra Dhir Narendra Vs. the State of Orissa in the Revenue ...

Court : Orissa

Reported in : AIR1953Ori121

..... under 'both' the sections 3 and 4 are contemplated as 'the business' of the board under section 5 of the court of wards act (sic). even, apart from that, there can be no doubt that under sub-section (2) of section 4, it was competent for the state government to assign the business of the court of wards to the board by ..... civil court in respect of any declaration made by the local government under sub-section (1) of clause (c).' no doubt, section 28 of the bengal act, as pointed out by my learned brother, specifically provides for action being ..... of section 10 of the orissa act, the local government appears to have the power to make the declaration without any reference to the report of the collector or the recommendation of the court of wards. in fact, no section provides for it; but on the other hand, sub-section (2) of section 5 states that 'no suit shall be brought in any .....