Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 9 of about 157 results (0.267 seconds)

May 08 2015 (HC)

Vinod and Others Vs. The State of Maharashtra, through Secretary Depar ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... per month as resource person in the year, 2008. the said order was for six months period and the same was renewed by giving one day's break. the respondent no.2 enhanced the remuneration from rs.4000/- to rs.10,000/- and further under the order dated 28th october, 2010, enhanced the same to rs.14000/- and thereafter, under ..... that the amount that was being paid to them was more than what they were entitled to. it would not be out of place to mention here that the finance department had, in its counter-affidavit, admitted that it was a bona fide mistake on their part. the excess payment made was the result of wrong interpretation of ..... of 19 years. the petitioners made representation to the respondents on 1st september, 2014 and made request not to act upon the government resolution dated 15th february, 1995 issued by the g.a.d., government of maharashtra, which had no concern with the appointments of the petitioner made under central scheme namely, sarva shiksha abhiyan. it was also stated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 25 2012 (HC)

Shiva Sahakari Up Jal Sinchan Sanstha Ltd. Vs. the Nanded District Cen ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... itself has gone to the stage of liquidation and some dispute arose about the repayment of loan. the respondent nos. 1 and 2 then filed dispute no. cc/156/2005 under section 91 of the maharashtra co-operative societies act, 1960, for recovery of the loan amount. in the said dispute, the bank has claimed that, the ..... act and indian stamp act, and came to the conclusion that, the act does not provide that, the promissory notes are required to be duly stamped ..... the proper stamp. it is submitted that, there is power under section 34 of the bombay stamp act to impound the document, however, the co-operative court has wrongly rejected the application of the original respondent nos. 1 and 2. it is submitted that, co-operative appellate court has rightly considered the provisions of bombay stamp .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 23 2012 (HC)

Shankar S/O. Nathuji Khandare Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... for in the present petition. thus, learned counsel for respondent no.2 urged that the present petition be dismissed. he relied upon judicial pronouncement of delhi high court, in the case of bobby kapoor vs. citi finance consumer finance india ltd. and others, reported at 2012 (2) bankers' journal 376, wherein it is observed thus: ..... trial court to conduct further cross examination of the complainant. 11. besides, admittedly, present case is a complaint filed under section 138 of negotiable instruments act, which is a summary trial and it cannot be overlooked that it shall be decided speedily. however, simultaneously, it also cannot be ignored that there ..... to the complainant. hence, the complainant filed complaint against the accused before learned judicial magistrate (f.c.), court no.1, aurangabad, under s.c.c. no. 5305/2009, under section 138 of negotiable instruments act. accordingly, learned judicial magistrate (f.c.) issued process against the accused. the accused appeared in the said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 10 2013 (HC)

Ahmednagar Municipal Corporation, Through Its Commissioner Vs. the Sta ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... the rights and legality or otherwise of the construction. as the respondent no. 5 has been given the right to finance, build and transfer the stadium, it is obvious that till the stadium is transferred to and vets in either petitioner or respondent no. 2, the respondent no.5 remains in charge. activities of development undertaken by it do not ..... 1.2005 written to the municipal commissioner of petitioner to scrutinize the plans as per s.58(2)(1) of 1966 act. this request was found incomplete and respondent 2 was called upon to make amends on 28.3.2005. respondent no. 2 in its letter dated 31.10.2005 sent to the chief minister refers to s. 58 but ..... contingencies, the provision there-under is permitted to be modified, that too after following the necessary prescribed procedure. the planning process under the mrtp act i.e. 1966 act is found to be quite an elaborate process. a number of town planners, architects and officers of the planning authority, and wherever necessary, those of the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 09 2014 (HC)

Naziruddin Khan s/o Mumtazuddin Khan Since deceased through Legal Repr ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... address informed that she had shifted to mumbai. the house was found to be in locked condition. report was given accordingly on 6-12-2010. summons to defendant no.2 (ii) ikramuddin khan was sent on the address of patel planet, aforesaid address. in the report dated 6-12-2010 bailiff informed to the court that he received ..... cpc. the suit was filed for specific performance of contract in respect of two agricultural lands, immovable property, situated in aurangabad district. all the defendants, including defendant no.2 were duly served with suit summons and they had appeared in the suit. the defendants were close relatives of each other and they were related as brothers and sisters ..... have last resided or carried on business or personally worked for gain, or in such other manner as the court thinks fit. (1-a) where the court acting under sub-rule (1) orders service by an advertisement in a newspaper, the newspaper shall be a daily newspaper circulating in the locality in which the defendant is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 17 2012 (HC)

Santosh Govind Mahajan Vs. State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... of the aforesaid states." apart from above, the provisions of section 189 of the bombay provincial municipal corporations act, 1949, cast duty upon the state and in particular, in the present case, respondent no.2, to supply potable water to the citizens of aurangabad. apart from this, there are other provisions in ..... problems are recurring with expansion and development of city and also because of increased population. it is further stated that instead of spending energy and finance for maintenance and repairing a new big project for water supply namely "samantar jalwahini" project is undertaken covering entire city taking into consideration the population ..... reply of the respondents, this court will think whether to initiate contempt proceedings or not against the respondents and in particular, respondent no.2. the learned counsel for the respondent no.2 has assured this court that details in respect of "samantar jalwahini" will be placed on record. as already observed, further affidavit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 17 2012 (HC)

Sau. Laxmibai Shantaram Doke Samajvikas Prathisthan and Another Vs. th ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... language schools, be it a primary school or a secondary school, in so far as making of application for establishing a school is concerned. question no.(ii) is answered accordingly by the full bench. full bench in para 10 observes that statements in the above said affidavit made it clear that in the ..... have to consider providing of more than one neighbourhood school. shri gatne, learned counsel also submitted that the state government has decided to promote self-financed and sustaining schools and a bill for that purpose is under consideration. all these factors show the effort of central as also state government to resolve ..... and to provide for matters connected therewith or incidental thereto. this legislation had received the assent of the president. under section 19 of the a.p. act, educational institutions are classified into three categories, namely, state institutions, local authority institutions and private institutions and granting of permission for the establishment of educational .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 17 2014 (HC)

The State of Maharashtra and Others Vs. Yuvraj and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... and murder of dr.vijaya chaudhari. 4] that on 4th july 2012, the superintendent of jalgaon district prison sent the application of the accused no.2 to the i.o. the accused no.2 gulab bhagwani has written the application from jalgaon prison stating that he is repenting over the crime and he is ready to disclose the true and ..... to be looked with great suspicion. consequently, in the event the suspicion which is attached to the evidence of accomplice is not removed, his evidence could not be acted upon unless corroborated in material particulars. 38. in the present case, the additional sessions judge accepted the evidence of approver-gulab as trustworthy, and relied upon the ..... entrance gate of hospital, because pw-9 pawan, who was standing there gave call to him. thereafter sometime required to talk and hatch conspiracy with accused no.1, followed by alleged act of killing of deceased. pw-1 deposed that, it took 15 minutes to reach to the graveyard from p.m. house. he admitted in his .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 29 2015 (HC)

Vikas @ Sadhu Gendev Hagare [Mali] Vs. The State of Maharashtra

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 21] was recovered vide memorandum panchanama exh.132 and seized under panchanama exh.133 from the field of kashinath doke. on 10.10.2010, at the instance of accused no. 2 navnath bhiva hagare rumane [wooden handle of plough] [article 22] was recovered vide memorandum panchanama exh.134 and it was seized under seizure panchanama exh.135 from ..... many as 6 injuries. it is submitted that, though she stated in her statement before the police that, 6 accused persons were present on the spot, and overt act is attributed to them. in her deposition before the court, she has only named three accused persons. it is further submitted that, though pw-1 claimed in her ..... the villagers were going towards the field of bhagwat hagare by uttering the words khun zhala, khun zhala . however, he stated that, he has not seen accused nos. 2 to 6 came running from the side of field of bhagwat hagare. the learned app sought permission from the court to cross examine this witness since witness was not supporting .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 09 2015 (HC)

Association of college and University superannuated teachers (Maharash ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... 3. the main grievance of the petitioner association pertains to government resolution dated 5th may, 2009 by which discrimination is made by the respondent no.2 state of maharashtra while making the revision of pension/family pension as per the directions given in the office memorandum dated 15th december, 2009 ..... various representations. 21. it prima facie appears that, the state government did not abide by clause (6) of the government resolution issued by the finance department of government of maharashtra dated 15th november, 1999, which is placed on record at exhibit `a' colly by the petitioner. the said ..... petitioner that, the petitioner is association of college and university superannuated teachers (maharashtra), which is a registered organization under the maharashtra societies registration act, 1860 bearing its registration no. mah 853/2009. the association of college and university superannuated teachers, (maharashtra) (hereinafter referred to as association ? for the sake of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //