Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: mumbai aurangabad Page 14 of about 157 results (0.187 seconds)

Feb 25 2011 (HC)

Smt. Samina W/O HafizuddIn Siddiqui and ors. Vs. Sk. Saleem S/O Sk. Me ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... e. the heirs and legal representatives of deceased hafizuddin; whereas respondent no.1 shaikh saleem sk. mehboob is the driver of offending vehicle matador, bearing registration no. mh20/a3638 and respondent no. 2, namely raosaheb kadam is the owner of the said matador. respondent no.3new india insurance company is the insurance company of the said ..... matador, however, respondent no.4 ravan is the ownercumdriver of the motor cycle and the ..... deceased was the pillion rider, to which the offending vehicle matador dashed, and respondent no.5 is the oriental insurance company i.e. the insurance company of the said motor cycle, bearing registration no. maa6425.2 the facts, which gave rise to the present appeal, can be briefly stated that on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 31 2011 (HC)

Shrirampur Municipal Council Vs. Shri V.K. Barde and ors.

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... .the reference was made by state of maharashtra under s.12(5) of the industrial disputes act,1947 ie ida hereafter. demand no. 1 is about increase in sanctioned posts on establishment schedule of the petitioner. demand no. 2 is to grant permanency to all those who have put in more than 180 days work with consequential benefits like pay-scales ..... model standing orders and after completion of 240 days. the demand 2 is correctly found covered by item 7 of third schedule of ida. alleged bar under s. 76 of 1965 act is also noted and it is correctly found that as workforce does not increase, there is no creation of new posts. they also point out two judgments of ..... & 2 before the industrial court in reference proceedings are not relatable to any entry in third schedule of ida and it is not classification by grades also as envisaged by item 7 therein. he invites attention to relevant provisions of the 1965 act to urge that petitioner has no power to create posts and that power is with state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2013 (HC)

The Chief Executive Officer Vs. Vaijinath S/O Abasaheb Shinde and Othe ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... should be given priority and they should be absorbed in the services as group secretaries. the said communication also notices that the very important work of finance to the agriculture through computerization scheme is being done by the group secretaries in the state of maharashtra and therefore, farmers are getting loan within the ..... body meeting dated 27th february, 2004, it was specifically resolved that considering the ban imposed by the state government, the employees of respondent no.4 were authorized to act and sign as group secretary. it was further resolved that because of shortage of group secretary and to meet the exigencies, the employees of ..... 22nd and 23rd september, 2011 by the learned member, industrial court, latur in complaints (ulp) no.22, 26, 27, 25, 24, and 23/2008. 2. the relevant facts, as narrated in the complaints, are thus: the respondent no.1 herein are the original complainants before the industrial court. they filed the complaints stating therein that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2012 (HC)

Amol Shripal Sheth Vs. M/S. Hari Om Trading Co. and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... bills and making payments in respect of the goods purchased for accused no. 1. the complainant had issued a statutory notice in this case after receiving the ..... partnership firm, accused no. 1. it is contended that accused no. 3 was working as a director and accused no. 4 was the officer authorized by accused no. 1 concern, to sign the cheques. it is the case of the complainant that the accused nos. 2 to 4 are responsible for conducting the business of accused no. 1 concern as they were doing acts like purchasing goods, preparing .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 17 2011 (HC)

Smt. Muktabai W/O Kashinath Shitole and ors.Vs. Vaijinath S/O Gena Shi ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... alienate the property with the prior permission of the bank authorities, as the property was mortgaged with the bank. a bare reading of section 47(2) of the mcs act indicates that no property, which is subject of the charge under earlier sub-section, shall be transferred in any manner without the previous permission of the society and ..... for the purpose of sub-section (1) to the assets created by a member out of the funds in respect of which the government has a claim.(2) no property or interest in property, which is subject to charge under the foregoing sub-section, shall be transferred in any manner without the previous permission of the ..... of sale transaction between them. therefore, according to the plaintiff, the sale is void, in view of section 47(2) and (3) of the maharashtra cooperative societies, act, 1960 ("mcs act" for short). moreover, according to the plaintiff, no title has been passed in favour of the defendant in respect of the suit land and, therefore, possession of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 28 2013 (HC)

Jalindar Ganpat Lawate and Another Vs. Pravara Medical Trust, Loni, at ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... industrial court can refuse to register a revision (ulp) filed under section 44 of the maharashtra recognition of trade unions and prevention of unfair labour practices act, 1971?" about writ petition no.6396 of 2012 4. the petitioner in this petition is taking exception to the impugned order dated 7.7.2012, passed by the learned industrial court ..... re-examine the same in accordance with law....." (b) in the case of yuvraj kalu patil vs. dhule and nandurbar zilla parishad karmachari sahakari patpedhi [2012 ii clr 366] this court has concluded that a revision application ought not to have been dismissed on the ground that remedy is available to the complainant to raise ..... as it challenges an order passed by the labour court dealing with a complaint under section 28(1) and an application for interim relief under section 30(2) of the act of 1971. 20. learned advocate for the respondents made a valiant effort to support and justify the impugned orders in these two petitions. however, when called .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 20 2015 (HC)

Ashok Vs. The Secretary, Gramvikas Shikshan Prasarak Mandal and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... nominated representatives of the petitioner- management on the inquiry committee. had the names of nominee or members of inquiry committee been communicated by this communication, the respondent no. 2 would have an opportunity to comment upon those names or object to the names or inclusion of any particular person. that was however, not done and, therefore, ..... of service as penalties. under rule 31, reduction in rank and termination of service are prescribed as major penalties. 8. section 4(6) of the act mandates that no employee of a private school shall be suspended, dismissed or removed or his services shall not be otherwise terminated or he shall not be reduced in rank ..... of india as follows:. in the following paragraphs, the full bench (cited supra), held thus: 28. it is also clear from the preamble of the act that this act has been enacted to regulate the recruitment and conditions of service of the employees, to provide such employees security and stability of service, to enable them to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 29 2015 (HC)

Ramesh Manik Patil Vs. The State of Maharashtra and Another

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... respondent/accused shri. gangakhedkar from criminal application nos. 4527 and 4529 of 2013 argued the matters. the learned app also argued and he supported the applicant by submitting that ..... lakh was shown to be paid before 20.7.2012, when the visit was paid by the inquiry officer, there was no public toilet block in existence. thus, by using this modus operandi, the amount of rs. 2.87 lakh was misappropriated. (v) it is noticed that there are two measurement books. there is inconsistency in the two ..... in c.r. nos. 71/13 and 73/13 registered in dharangaon police station, dharangaon for the offences punishable under sections 409, 420, 467, 468, 477-a, r/w. 34 etc. of indian penal code ('i.p.c.' for short) and sections 13 (1) (d) r/w. 13 (2) of prevention of corruption act, 1988 ('pc act' for short). 2. learned counsel for .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 08 2014 (HC)

New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Smt. Narmada w/o Chintaman Sap ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... of the insurance policy, the appellant is entitled to seek exoneration as the insurance company is insulated from the liability u/s 147 and 149(2)(a)(ii) of the motor vehicles act. 7. he submits that apart from the same being statutory defence, his such submission would find reinforcement in decision reported in 2008 air scw ..... had been persuasive in his submissions before this court to impress upon that it has emerged in evidence that, the driver of the vehicle - original respondent no.1 - present respondent no.7 did not have valid and effective driving licence on the day on which the accident had occurred. he, therefore, submits that the insurance company ..... amongst the three minor children, to be invested in fixed deposit receipt, in central bank of india, jalgaon, till the children attain majority. 5. there is no dispute about the fact that in the appeal, the appellant insurance company had been directed to deposit the entire award amount, which accordingly has been deposited. from said .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2012 (HC)

Satish S/O. Mahipatirao Kendre Vs. the State of Maharashtra and Others

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

..... be recovered on 19.11.2011. 11. accused bibhishan came to be arrested in the month of december 2011. no blood was found on his clothes. the statement of bibhishan came to be recorded under section 27 of evidence act on 6.12.2011. on the basis of this statement, the weapon like a cookery, having blood stains and ..... persons were involved in the incident as assailants. their names are given by the complainant and two witnesses like nandraj and balaji and they are as under:- (i) balasaheb shep, (ii) bibhishan chate, (iii) shrihari chate, (iv) govind chate, (v) suryakant chate, and (vi) sanjay chate. the names of only balasaheb shep and bibhishan chate were given ..... for an order of cancellation of bail already granted." the general grounds for cancellation are quoted by the apex court as:- (i) interference in the administration of justice, (ii) attempt to evade due course of justice or abuse to the concession granted, and (iii) possibility of absconding of accused etc. it is laid down by the apex .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //