Array ( [0] => ..... the nature of warranty, he cannot be considered to be a consumer even for the purpose of services during the warranty period in view of the amendment to section 2(d)(ii) of the act, which came into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003. in view of this, the complainant cannot be held to be a consumer with reference to the ..... the services during the warranty period were not provided and the defects were not rectified. hence, complaint was filed on 1.8.2000. prior to the amendment section 2(1)(d)(ii) by amendment act, 2002 a person hiring or availing services for consideration was not excluded even though the services were availed for any commercial purpose. therefore, in this case, if there ..... o.p.no.2 is engaged in business of manufacturing body and machine and o.p.no.3 is dealer of o.p.no.1 and 2 at raipur from whom the complainant purchased j.c.b. machine. the complainant purchased j.c.b. machine j.s.80 for self employment for earning livelihood of himself and his family with the help of finance from o ..... [1] => ..... 1973 and, as such, the case was rightly investigated by the police under the provisions of the crpc.13. the petitioners have acted as an agent of royal vision. during pendency of this petition, respondent no.6 (royal vision) was deleted at the cost of the petitioners. there are certain other documents also produced by the state, ..... the agreement within 90 days, but it failed to do so in spite of the notice.4. the petitioner no.2 received a notice under section 91 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (for short "the crpc") bearing no.sic/rai/73/11 dated 20-1-2011 (annexure - p/4) from the office of the special investigation ..... or any of its partners have not committed any offence. as per the provisions of section 37 (2) of the chhattisgarh society registrikaran adhiniyam, 1973 (for short "the adhiniyam, 1973"), no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under this act except upon complaint made by the registrar or any other person, authorized in writing by him, in ..... [2] => ..... of the district returning officer (local election), balrampur which he could not comply leading to passing of the order dated 28-1-2015 by the respondent no.2 placing the petitioner under suspension in exercise of power conferred under section 27-a of the niyam, 1995 after finding the petitioner's reply unsatisfactory given to ..... returning officer, balaghat and others (1992 mplj 173)in which the district returning officer exercising the power under section 28-a of the representation of the people act, 1951 which is pari-materia provision to the provision contained in rule 27-a of the niyam, 1995 placed the petitioner therein on suspension, the division ..... k of the constitution of india. therefore, the order of suspension followed by departmental enquiry deserves to be quashed. 5. the state of chhattisgarh / respondents no.1 to 3 has filed reply opposing the writ petition holding that the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing appeal before the appellate authority and the petitioner has ..... [3] => ..... /ct/v (20) dated 1-4-2005 (annexure - p/4) issued by the government of chhattisgarh, department of finance and planning (commercial tax department) whereby the earlier the notification no.f 10/16/2002/ct/v (17) dated 12-2-2002 has been rescinded. 2. the petitioner is a manufacturer of steel tubes in an integrated plant. according to the petitioner steel strips are ..... any dealer having his place of business of steel tuber as specified in category (xi) of clause (iv) of section 14 of the central sales tax act, 1956 (no. 74 of 1956) in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, shall, with effect from the date of publication of this notification in official gazette, be calculated at the ..... 10/11/2005/ct/v(20) - in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8(5) of the central sales tax act, 1956 (no. 74 of 1956) the state government hereby rescinds this department notification no. f-10/16/2002/ct/v(17) dated 12.02.2002 with effect from 01.04.2005. by order and in the name of the governor of ..... [4] => ..... be necessary for the business of the company under the provisions of central excise act, finance act, custom act, income tax act, state sales tax / vat, central sales tax act, 1956, entry tax and professional tax act and any other act of similar nature of taxes. 2. .............. 3. to collect all types of statutory forms from the appropriate authorities ..... filed two separate complaints for same cause of action taking the complaint within pecuniary jurisdiction of this commission. 13. document op-3 filed in complaint case no.12/01 is a note of deepak mehta, director / authorized signatory of sks ispat and power limited. in the said document it is mentioned that ..... wrote letters several time to the complainant but the complainant failed to submit documents before him and therefore, the insurance company proceeded against the complainant as no claim and did not commit any deficiency in service, hence the complainant is not entitled for any compensation from the ops and the complaint is liable ..... [5] => ..... document d-1(1) to 1(4) is letter dated june 23, 2009 sent by national insurance co. ltd. to the respondent no.2 (complainant), document d-2 is letter dated july 08, 2009 sent by national insurance company limited ..... . 14. the o.p. nos.2, 3 and 5 have also filed documents. document d1(1) is notarial certificate, document d-1(2) and 1(3) is power of attorney, document d-2(1) to d-2(3) is statement of account, document d-3(1) to d-3(6) is hire purchase finance agreement. 15. the o.p.no.4 has also filed documents. ..... valid driving licence and, thus, the vehicle was being driven in violation of provisions of the motor vehicles act, 1988, so also the insurance company was not liable to pay any compensation to the respondent no.1 (complainant). 4. respondent no.4 (o.p.no.4) the national insurance company limited in the separate reply has also denied its liability and averred that ..... [6] => ..... the said vehicle was insured with respondent/o.p. under policy no.191600/31/11/01/00003547 for the period from 06.09.2011 to 05.09.2012. on 10.09. ..... dated 08.03.2013, passed by district consumer disputes redressal forum, raigarh (c.g.) (henceforth œdistrict forum") in complaint case no.153/2012, whereby the complaint of the appellant/ complainant, has been dismissed 2. briefly stated, the facts of the complaint case filed by the appellant/complainant before the district forum are : that the appellant/ ..... complainant, is registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration no.c.g.13-c-8872. the said vehicle has been purchased by the complainant/appellant with the help of finance provided by the finance company. ..... [7] => ..... 3757: (2004) 5 scc 632} (the kalyan-mandapan case) is relevant to the case in hand. in this case, the validity of sections 6, 67(o) of the finance act, 1994 and rule 2(1)(d)(ix) of the service tax rules, 1994 have been upheld. the court says, 'in regard to the submission made on article 366 (29-a)(f), we are ..... be coordination between the state and the central government authorities. the amount over which service tax has been charged should not be subject to vat. 41. there is no provision in the vat-act to bifurcate the amount. the state government will do well to frame such rules to this effect. these rules may be in conformity with the bifurcation as provided ..... of food and the drinks inside the restaurant is deemed to be the sale within the meaning of article 366(29a)(f) of the constitution of india; the parliament has no legislative competence to enact a law to tax sale of food and drinks. 14. article 366 of the constitution is titled as 'definitions'. its sub-article (29a) was inserted ..... [8] => ..... 2007 m/s magma leasing ltd. v. shri bharat singh, decided on 13.08.2012, judgments of this commission in case of mohammad shamshad khan v. shri ram transport finance company (appeal no.430/2011) and shri ram transport finance company v. mohammad shamshad khan (appeal no.448/2011) decided on 16.05.2012, bajaj allianz general insurance co. ltd. v. harvinder singh (appeal ..... under :- "the provisions of the act are to be construed widely to give effect to the object and purpose of the ..... the plain language of section 3 of the consumer act makes it clear that the remedy available in that act is in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. in fair air engineers (p) ltd. v. n.k. modi (supra), the 2 “ judge bench interpreted that section and held as ..... [9] => ..... further averred that actually the dispute between the parties is in respect of account, which can be adjudicated as per arbitration clause of hire purchase finance agreement, instead of consumer protection act. the complaint of the appellant/complainant, be dismissed with cost. 4. learned district forum, after appreciation of the materials available before it, dismissed ..... , he cannot be considered to be a consumer even for the purpose of services during the warranty period in view of the amendment to section 2(d)(ii) of the act, which came into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003. in view of this, the complainant cannot be held to be a consumer with ..... jcb machine. 9. the respondents/ops have also filed documents i.e. hire purchase finance agreement dated 6th september 2006, schedule i, certificate of registration certificate number (annexure 1), tax certificate regarding the vehicle bearing no.w.b.26-c-4225 (annexure “ 2), cash receipt dated 12.12.2006 (annexure 3), statement of account, legal notice ..... ) Finance No 2 Act 2009 Chapter Iii Direct Taxes - Court Chhattisgarh - Page 3 - Judgments | SooperKanoon Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: chhattisgarh Page 3 of about 112 results (0.303 seconds)

Mar 12 2014 (TRI)

Vincent Anty Vs. M/S. M.B. Kirloskar Oil Engine Limited, Through: Mana ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the nature of warranty, he cannot be considered to be a consumer even for the purpose of services during the warranty period in view of the amendment to section 2(d)(ii) of the act, which came into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003. in view of this, the complainant cannot be held to be a consumer with reference to the ..... the services during the warranty period were not provided and the defects were not rectified. hence, complaint was filed on 1.8.2000. prior to the amendment section 2(1)(d)(ii) by amendment act, 2002 a person hiring or availing services for consideration was not excluded even though the services were availed for any commercial purpose. therefore, in this case, if there ..... o.p.no.2 is engaged in business of manufacturing body and machine and o.p.no.3 is dealer of o.p.no.1 and 2 at raipur from whom the complainant purchased j.c.b. machine. the complainant purchased j.c.b. machine j.s.80 for self employment for earning livelihood of himself and his family with the help of finance from o .....

Tag this Judgment!
Aug 11 2011 (HC)

Matoshri Developers and Another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... 1973 and, as such, the case was rightly investigated by the police under the provisions of the crpc.13. the petitioners have acted as an agent of royal vision. during pendency of this petition, respondent no.6 (royal vision) was deleted at the cost of the petitioners. there are certain other documents also produced by the state, ..... the agreement within 90 days, but it failed to do so in spite of the notice.4. the petitioner no.2 received a notice under section 91 of the code of criminal procedure, 1973 (for short "the crpc") bearing no.sic/rai/73/11 dated 20-1-2011 (annexure - p/4) from the office of the special investigation ..... or any of its partners have not committed any offence. as per the provisions of section 37 (2) of the chhattisgarh society registrikaran adhiniyam, 1973 (for short "the adhiniyam, 1973"), no court shall take cognizance of an offence punishable under this act except upon complaint made by the registrar or any other person, authorized in writing by him, in .....

Tag this Judgment!
Nov 05 2015 (HC)

Vijay Jamnik Vs. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Water Resou ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... of the district returning officer (local election), balrampur which he could not comply leading to passing of the order dated 28-1-2015 by the respondent no.2 placing the petitioner under suspension in exercise of power conferred under section 27-a of the niyam, 1995 after finding the petitioner's reply unsatisfactory given to ..... returning officer, balaghat and others (1992 mplj 173)in which the district returning officer exercising the power under section 28-a of the representation of the people act, 1951 which is pari-materia provision to the provision contained in rule 27-a of the niyam, 1995 placed the petitioner therein on suspension, the division ..... k of the constitution of india. therefore, the order of suspension followed by departmental enquiry deserves to be quashed. 5. the state of chhattisgarh / respondents no.1 to 3 has filed reply opposing the writ petition holding that the petitioner has alternative remedy of filing appeal before the appellate authority and the petitioner has .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 19 2012 (HC)

Krishna Iron Strips and Tubes Private Limited Vs. State of Chhattisgar ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... /ct/v (20) dated 1-4-2005 (annexure - p/4) issued by the government of chhattisgarh, department of finance and planning (commercial tax department) whereby the earlier the notification no.f 10/16/2002/ct/v (17) dated 12-2-2002 has been rescinded. 2. the petitioner is a manufacturer of steel tubes in an integrated plant. according to the petitioner steel strips are ..... any dealer having his place of business of steel tuber as specified in category (xi) of clause (iv) of section 14 of the central sales tax act, 1956 (no. 74 of 1956) in the course of inter-state trade or commerce, shall, with effect from the date of publication of this notification in official gazette, be calculated at the ..... 10/11/2005/ct/v(20) - in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8(5) of the central sales tax act, 1956 (no. 74 of 1956) the state government hereby rescinds this department notification no. f-10/16/2002/ct/v(17) dated 12.02.2002 with effect from 01.04.2005. by order and in the name of the governor of .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 16 2014 (TRI)

Sks Ispat and Power Limited Vs. Chairman Cum Managing Director, Head O ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... be necessary for the business of the company under the provisions of central excise act, finance act, custom act, income tax act, state sales tax / vat, central sales tax act, 1956, entry tax and professional tax act and any other act of similar nature of taxes. 2. .............. 3. to collect all types of statutory forms from the appropriate authorities ..... filed two separate complaints for same cause of action taking the complaint within pecuniary jurisdiction of this commission. 13. document op-3 filed in complaint case no.12/01 is a note of deepak mehta, director / authorized signatory of sks ispat and power limited. in the said document it is mentioned that ..... wrote letters several time to the complainant but the complainant failed to submit documents before him and therefore, the insurance company proceeded against the complainant as no claim and did not commit any deficiency in service, hence the complainant is not entitled for any compensation from the ops and the complaint is liable .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 22 2014 (TRI)

The Oriental Insurance Company Limited Vs. Praveen Dubey and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... document d-1(1) to 1(4) is letter dated june 23, 2009 sent by national insurance co. ltd. to the respondent no.2 (complainant), document d-2 is letter dated july 08, 2009 sent by national insurance company limited ..... . 14. the o.p. nos.2, 3 and 5 have also filed documents. document d1(1) is notarial certificate, document d-1(2) and 1(3) is power of attorney, document d-2(1) to d-2(3) is statement of account, document d-3(1) to d-3(6) is hire purchase finance agreement. 15. the o.p.no.4 has also filed documents. ..... valid driving licence and, thus, the vehicle was being driven in violation of provisions of the motor vehicles act, 1988, so also the insurance company was not liable to pay any compensation to the respondent no.1 (complainant). 4. respondent no.4 (o.p.no.4) the national insurance company limited in the separate reply has also denied its liability and averred that .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 07 2014 (TRI)

Paduman Singh Vs. Manager, United India Insurance Company Limited

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the said vehicle was insured with respondent/o.p. under policy no.191600/31/11/01/00003547 for the period from 06.09.2011 to 05.09.2012. on 10.09. ..... dated 08.03.2013, passed by district consumer disputes redressal forum, raigarh (c.g.) (henceforth district forum") in complaint case no.153/2012, whereby the complaint of the appellant/ complainant, has been dismissed 2. briefly stated, the facts of the complaint case filed by the appellant/complainant before the district forum are : that the appellant/ ..... complainant, is registered owner of the vehicle bearing registration no.c.g.13-c-8872. the said vehicle has been purchased by the complainant/appellant with the help of finance provided by the finance company. .....

Tag this Judgment!
May 06 2014 (HC)

M/S. Hotel East Park and Another Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... 3757: (2004) 5 scc 632} (the kalyan-mandapan case) is relevant to the case in hand. in this case, the validity of sections 6, 67(o) of the finance act, 1994 and rule 2(1)(d)(ix) of the service tax rules, 1994 have been upheld. the court says, 'in regard to the submission made on article 366 (29-a)(f), we are ..... be coordination between the state and the central government authorities. the amount over which service tax has been charged should not be subject to vat. 41. there is no provision in the vat-act to bifurcate the amount. the state government will do well to frame such rules to this effect. these rules may be in conformity with the bifurcation as provided ..... of food and the drinks inside the restaurant is deemed to be the sale within the meaning of article 366(29a)(f) of the constitution of india; the parliament has no legislative competence to enact a law to tax sale of food and drinks. 14. article 366 of the constitution is titled as 'definitions'. its sub-article (29a) was inserted .....

Tag this Judgment!
Feb 04 2014 (TRI)

Magma Fincorp Limited, Through : Branch Manager Vs. Maan Singh

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... 2007 m/s magma leasing ltd. v. shri bharat singh, decided on 13.08.2012, judgments of this commission in case of mohammad shamshad khan v. shri ram transport finance company (appeal no.430/2011) and shri ram transport finance company v. mohammad shamshad khan (appeal no.448/2011) decided on 16.05.2012, bajaj allianz general insurance co. ltd. v. harvinder singh (appeal ..... under :- "the provisions of the act are to be construed widely to give effect to the object and purpose of the ..... the plain language of section 3 of the consumer act makes it clear that the remedy available in that act is in addition to and not in derogation of the provisions of any other law for the time being in force. in fair air engineers (p) ltd. v. n.k. modi (supra), the 2 judge bench interpreted that section and held as .....

Tag this Judgment!
Apr 25 2014 (TRI)

Mohammad Momid Khan Vs. Magma Leasing Limited, Through: Managing Direc ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... further averred that actually the dispute between the parties is in respect of account, which can be adjudicated as per arbitration clause of hire purchase finance agreement, instead of consumer protection act. the complaint of the appellant/complainant, be dismissed with cost. 4. learned district forum, after appreciation of the materials available before it, dismissed ..... , he cannot be considered to be a consumer even for the purpose of services during the warranty period in view of the amendment to section 2(d)(ii) of the act, which came into force w.e.f. 15.3.2003. in view of this, the complainant cannot be held to be a consumer with ..... jcb machine. 9. the respondents/ops have also filed documents i.e. hire purchase finance agreement dated 6th september 2006, schedule i, certificate of registration certificate number (annexure 1), tax certificate regarding the vehicle bearing no.w.b.26-c-4225 (annexure 2), cash receipt dated 12.12.2006 (annexure 3), statement of account, legal notice .....

Tag this Judgment!




Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //