Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance no 2 act 2009 chapter iii direct taxes Court: chhattisgarh Page 11 of about 112 results (1.627 seconds)

Bhilai Engineering Corporation Limited Vs. the Commissioner Central Ex ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... collector of central excise, shillong v. wood craft products ltd.1, collector of central excise, bombay v. k.w.h. heliplastics ltd.2 and collector of customs v. kumudam publications (p) ltd.3 are of no assistance in the dispute involved in the instant case. 20. in dunlop india ltd. v. union of india and others4, three hon'ble ..... ) per satish k. agnihotri, j. 1. heard learned counsel for the parties. 2. the present appeal filed under section 35-g of the central excise act, 1944 (for short "the act, 1944") arises from the final order no.03/05-b dated 24-12-2004 (annexure a/4) passed by the customs, excise and service tax appellate tribunal (for short `cestat ..... w.e.f. 30-12-1995 in which `car' claiming classification under chapter sub-heading no.8455.00 under heading no.84.55 with effective rate of duty 10% advalorem, as being a part of the rolling mill. 5. thereafter, the assistant commissioner, central excise, division ii, bhilai, issued a notice dated 28-7-1995 (annexure - a/1) and directed .....

The New India Assurance Company Limited Vs. Siddique Rizwani

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... the appellant/o.p. it appears that the respondent/complainant obtained a fresh insurance policy from the appellant/o.p. and in the policy registration no., engine no. and chassis no. of the vehicle were mentioned. the same numbers have also been mentioned in the certificate of insurance. it appears that after due verification of the ..... the terms and conditions of the insurance policy and the learned district forum has ironed this fact that the respondent/complainant himself is liable for his negligent act and therefore, the impugned order passed by the district forum suffers from irregularity and illegality and is liable to be set aside. 7. none appeared before ..... company ltd. v. j.p. leasing and finance pvt. ltd., (r.p no.643 / 2005), (2) punjab chemical agency v. national insurance company ltd. (r.p. no.2097), (3) new india assurance co. ltd. v. sou. bahrati rajiv bankar, (rp no.3294 / 2009) and (4) national insurance company ltd. v. jeetmal, (rp no.3366/2009). there has been a landmark .....

Rajesh Kumar Kaushik Vs. The State of Madhya Pradesh (now the State of ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... deemed to have caused her death. explanation. for the purposes of this sub-section, dowry shall have the same meaning as in section 2 of the dowry prohibition act, 1961 (28 of 1961). (2) whoever commits dowry death shall be punished with imprisonment for a term which shall not be less than seven years but which may extend ..... if the alleged incident of cruelty is remote in time and has become stale enough not to disturb the mental equilibrium of the woman concerned, it would be of no consequence. 25. while dealing with same question, the supreme court in the matter of prem kanwar (supra), has held that the expression 'soon before' would normally ..... appellant has preferred the appeal against the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 28-4-2000 passed by the 2nd additional sessions judge, bilaspur in sessions trial no.1/2000, whereby while acquitting two other co-accused namely malluram kaushik and smt. kaveri bai, father and mother of the appellant, of the charges under sections .....

Reliance General Insurance Company Ltd Vs. Karuna Shukla and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... light of the law laid down by the hon'ble supreme court in the matter of national insurance company ltd. vs. keshav bahadur and others reported in (2004) 2 scc 370 wherein the hon'ble supreme court has held that direction in the award for retrospective enhancement of interest for default in payment of the compensation together with interest ..... the annual income of the deceased and thereafter 1/3rd deduction towards personal and living expenditure of the deceased and thus, the total loss of income would come to rs.2,08,000/- (3,36,000-24000 x 1/3). if we apply multiplier of 11 to this amount, as the deceased was 51 years of age at the ..... by way of this appeal under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 (for short `the act, 1988'), the appellant-insurance company has challenged the award dated 18.11.2010 passed by learned 1st additional motor accident claims tribunal, raipur (for short `the claims tribunal') in claim case no.115/09. 5. the appellant had not only challenged liability part .....

Satjas Glorocks Private Ltd Vs. Bharat Aluminum Company Limited

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... above paragraphs of the award, it appears that the learned sole arbitrator did not record any specific reason for arriving at finding regarding issue no.8. 21. in the 1996 act, an important change has been made that an arbitrator is required to assign reasons in support an award. a mere statement of reasons ..... transported by road to its alumina plant in korba district (chhattisgarh). this mining and transportation of ore is done through contractors. the appellant, vide letter dated 2-2-2002, approached the respondent to offer its services in this behalf. a profile of the appellant detailing its assets, professional team and experience was attached with this ..... conditions of the contract. quality of the bauxite mined by the appellant was poor and, therefore, the respondent deducted some penalty in terms of clause 12.2 of the agreement. the appellant also failed to make payments regarding labour-charges, provident-fund, pension-deposits, workers' wages/remuneration and panchayat-tax, which, it .....

iffco âandeuro;andldquo; Tokio General Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Cha ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... , raigarh (c.g.) (annexure 5) with photographs of the vehicle in question, certificate of registration (annexure 6), letter dated 30.04.2011 sent by mahindra finance to the respondent/complainant (annexure 7), estimate (annexure 8 and 9), copy of first information report (annexure 10), copy of driving licence of pitamber sidar (annexure ..... tractor was being used by the respondent/complainant for the commercial purpose, therefore, he does not come in the category of "consumer" under section 2(1)(d) of the consumer protection act, 1986, therefore, the complaint be dismissed. 4. learned district forum, after appreciation of the materials available before it, allowed the complaint of ..... the respondent /complainant before the district forum are : that the respondent/complainant purchased a tractor bearing registration no.c.g.13-d-9576 on 30.04.2011 with the help of financier mahindra finance. the said vehicle was insured by the appellant/insurance company after receiving premium of rs.6,610.94 .....

Branch Manager, National Insurance Company Limited Vs. Lekhan Chand Sa ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... on 08.05.2012. thus, the appellant/o.p./insurance company committed deficiency in service. the respondent/complainant filed complaint under section 12 of the consumer protection act, 1986 before district forum claiming value of the insured vehicle rs.48,646/-, rs.10,000/- towards compensation for mental agony, rs.3,000/- towards cost ..... (fir) of the incident. the surveyor of the insurance company, has also mentioned that the handle of the vehicle was unlocked, which was violation of condition no.4 of the insurance contract, therefore, the appellant/o.p./insurance company, is not liable for payment of compensation to the respondent /complainant. the respondent/complainant ..... ltd. v. j.p. leasing and finance pvt. ltd., (r.p no.643 / 2005), (2) punjab chemical agency v. national insurance company ltd. (r.p. no.2097), (3) new india assurance co. ltd. v. sou. bahrati rajiv bankar, (rp no.3294 / 2009) and (4) national insurance company ltd. v. jeetmal, (rp no.3366/2009). there has been a landmark .....

Mana Singh and Another Vs. Vijay @ Lovekush Kumar and Others

Court : Chhattisgarh

..... 222 four judges of hon'ble apex court have held in paragraph 5 thus as under:-"5. the expression "total disablement" has been defined in section 2(1)(1) of the act as follows:-"(1) "total disablement" means such disablement, whether of a temporary or permanent nature, as incapacitates workman for all work which he was capable ..... taking load on his body. it, however, appears that in his cross-examination, he categorically stated that only chief medical officer had checked him in his office. no disability certificate had been granted. he admitted that he had not suffered any permanent disability. he, even according to the chief medical officer who had not been examined, ..... relevant factors relating to loss of earning capacity. without indicating any reason or basis the high court held that there was 100% loss of earning capacity. since no basis was indicated in support of the conclusion, same cannot be maintained. therefore, we set aside that part of the high court's order and restore that .....

The Competent Authority (Claims/Omkar), H.D.F.C. Standard Life Insuran ...

Court : Chhattisgarh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Raipur

..... allowed. so far as this case is concerned the insured died ten days after completion of grace period in case due date is considered to 21st but 1-2 days or even no delay after the completion of grace period if the due date is considered to be 26th. or thereafter, the date of receipt of acceptance by the life assured ..... while filling the proposal form the life to be assured was made to understand and make a declaration that contract of insurance would be governed by the provisions of insurance act 1938 and that the same will not commence until written acceptance of this application by hdfc standard life insurance company ltd. is received. be effective only after its ..... out attention to few photocopy of pages of the book modern law of insurance in india and tried to convince that as per provision of section 113 of the insurance act, as the premium was continuously paid for 3 years, the total aggregate sum mentioned in the policy was to be paid to the complainant. he also submitted that .....

Mahendra Kumar Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh (Now C.G.)

Court : Chhattisgarh

Reported in : 2010CriLJ1167

..... the evidence available on record has rightly come to conclusion that the appellant is guilty of having committed offence under section 3 (1)(xi) of the act of 1989 and i find no reason nor justification to interfere with the said finding and conclusion of the learned trial court. the conviction of the appellant under section 3(1)(xi) ..... or any error, or irregularity in any sanction for the prosecution, unless in the opinion of that court, a failure of justice has in fact been occasioned thereby.(2) in determining whether any error, omission or irregularity in any proceeding under this code, or any error or irregularity in any sanction for the prosecution has occasioned a ..... took cognizance without there being any committal proceedings. in support of this contention, he placed reliance on gangula ashok and anr. v. state of a.p. : (2000) 2 scc 504 : air 2000 sc 740 : 2000 cri lj 819. the second ground of attack is that the conviction and sentence passed by the learned special judge is not .....