Finance Bill - Judgment Search Results

Jindal thermal Power Company Limited (Formerly Jindal Tracteble Power ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: (2006)203CTR(Kar)381; [2006]286ITR182(KAR); [2006]286ITR182(Karn)

pay advance tax under Section 115JB which was introduced by Finance Act, 2000 and despite the same no advance tax was amendment to Section 115JB by Finance Act, 2002.17. The Finance bill was introduced in the Parliament on 29.2.2000 and Finance Act,

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Electro Graphites Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2000)160CTR(SC)8; [2000]243ITR48(SC)

28 was inserted by the Finance Bill of 1990. The Finance Bill which ultimately became the Finance Act received assent of was inserted by the Finance Bill of 1990. The Finance Bill which ultimately became the Finance Act received assent of the

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Hindustan Elector Graphites Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: [2000]109TAXMAN342(SC); [2000]243ITR48SC

but that was by amendment of Section 28 by the Finance Act of 1990 which amendment could not have been known Clause (iiib) in Section 28 was inserted by the Finance Bill of 1990. The Finance Bill which ultimately became the Finance

M/s. Carrier Race Technologies Pvt. Ltd. Vs. The Income Tax Officer, C ...

Court: Chennai

be inserted after sub-section (14) of section 144C by the Finance Act, 2013, w.e.f. 1-4-2016 : (14A)The provisions of this section Finance Bill and the Notes and clauses accompanying the Finance Bill which preceded the Finance (No.2) Act, 2009 clearly indicated that

CochIn Potteries (P) Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1964Ker18

the expression 'chinaware' occurring in the relevant items in the Finance Bill, 10 of 1961, includes also all glazed clayware. It of the sixtieth day after the day on which the Bill containing it was introduced'. It will be noted that under

Ghodawat Pan Masala Products (i) Ltd. and anr. Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2002(6)BomCR466; [2003]130STC310(Bom)

notification of the Government of India in the Ministry of Finance (Department of Revenue) No. 5/97-Central Excise (NT), dated the 1st the sub-heading No. 2106.00. By Clause 127 of the Finance Bill, 2001 (Bill No.17 of 2001) certain amendments were proposed to

Star India (P) Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: (2006)201CTR(SC)63; [2006]280ITR321(SC)

on the basis of the amendment brought about by the Finance Act, 2002. The further appeal before the Customs, Excise and of thirty days from the date on which the Finance Bill, 2002 receives the assent of the President, and in the

Haresh Anitha Trust Vs. Commissioner of Wealth-tax

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1988)69CTR(Mad)86; [1988]173ITR103(Mad)

in the statute book. Section 21 was introduced by the Finance Bill of 1970 and the memo explaining provisions in that of 1970 and the memo explaining provisions in that Finance Bill is to be found in [1970] 75 ITR 81. The

Rojer Mathew Vs. South Indian Bank Ltd and Ors Chief Manager

Court: Supreme Court of India

Constitution. Petitioners, in addition to challenging the vires of the Finance Act, 2017 also prayed for a mandamus directing the State avoid answering and deciding the scope and ambit of Money Bill under Article 110(1) of the Constitution. For example, taxation enactments

Collector of Central Excise Vs. Indian Pistons Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (1990)LC510Tri(Delhi)

in which SED was imposed by the provisions of 1987 Finance Bill Clause 98 thereof.Examining these contentions it is noted that SED and in this connection, he referred to 1987 Finance Bill which also levied SED at the rate of 10% of