Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2012 central chapter iii direct taxes Court: mumbai Page 58 of about 763 results (0.070 seconds)

CEAT Limited Vs. The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Nashi ...

Court : Mumbai

..... tribunal is correct in not following two binding precedents of this court reported at ispat industries 2010 (259) elt 662 (bom.) and tata motors order dated 1.2.2012 in central excise appeal no.54 of 2011? 3. since extensive arguments of both sides have been heard, by consent of parties, we proceed to dispose of these appeals finally ..... a notice to show cause-cum-demand came to be issued on 14th september, 2012 seeking to recover from the assessee the interest of rs.5,11,090/- under rule 7(4) of the central excise rules read with section 11ab of the act on the amount of differential duty paid on the finalization of provisional assessment by the ..... appellants during the relevant period. 8. the assessee replied to this notice by their letter dated 9th november, 2012 and raised the following contentions; (i) interest .....

The Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS) Vs. M/s. Maharashtra State Electr ...

Court : Mumbai

..... took us through the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court in the case of reserve bank of india vs. peerless general finance and investment co. ltd. and others reported in (1987) 1 scc 424 in which the court was considering the contextual construction ..... entered into bulk transmission agreement/s in which it was agreed inter alia that, pgcil is desirous of transmitting energy from the central sector power station(s) to the bulk power beneficiaries (the boards) and that the said boards are desirous of receiving the ..... conducted by the revenue authorities at the assessee's premises to verify compliance of the provisions in the income tax act, 1961 (the act) relating to tax deduction at source (tds). in the course of the survey, it was noticed that the assessee ..... is evidence from the recent decision of the authority of advance ruling dated 27th august, 2012 in the case of ajmer vidyut vitran nigam limited as reported in (2012) 24 taxmann.com 300 where it has been held that wt charges are fees for .....

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... individuals. the inquiry is a public inquiry in which all individuals participated. 48 mr.deshpande pointed out, for illustration, annexure-a to writ petition no.238/2012 and submitted that in the advertisement dated 14.08.2004 for making recruitment and appointment to the posts of sra and jra, total posts are indicated, but ..... jra) stands cancelled. 3 mr.manohar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners requested us to refer to the facts in writ petition no. 238/2012. accordingly, it would be advantageous to refer to these facts to appreciate the challenge raised. 4 it is common ground that the pdkv is an agricultural university and ..... any other recommendation, is making mockery of his powers and also the provisions of the said act. the act enacts safeguards and inbuilt, checks and balances for proper and regular conduct of the affairs of the university, its administration and finances. no selection or appointment of public office can be made except in a lawful, fair and .....

Hitendrasingh S/O Bhupendrasingh and Others Vs. Dr. Panjabrao Deshmukh ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... individuals. the inquiry is a public inquiry in which all individuals participated. 48 mr.deshpande pointed out, for illustration, annexure-a to writ petition no.238/2012 and submitted that in the advertisement dated 14.08.2004 for making recruitment and appointment to the posts of sra and jra, total posts are indicated, but ..... jra ) stands cancelled. 3 mr.manohar, learned senior counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners requested us to refer to the facts in writ petition no. 238/2012. accordingly, it would be advantageous to refer to these facts to appreciate the challenge raised. 4 it is common ground that the pdkv is an agricultural university ..... any other recommendation, is making mockery of his powers and also the provisions of the said act. the act enacts safeguards and inbuilt, checks and balances for proper and regular conduct of the affairs of the university, its administration and finances. no selection or appointment of public office can be made except in a lawful, fair and .....

Uti Mutual Fund, Through Its Trustees Uti Trustee Company Pvt. Ltd. Vs ...

Court : Mumbai

..... an assessee in default in respect of amount of tax payable by him or it in case the additional income-tax is not paid to the credit of central government. this amendment will take effect from 1st june, 2013. 15. the revenue urged before the court that the proposed amendment which is to take effect ..... year continue to remain pending. 11. counsel appearing on behalf of the revenue, however, submits that the judgment which was delivered by this court on 14 march 2012 is distinguishable since the assessing officer has in the course of the assessment of the trust carefully evaluated the provisions of law. learned counsel submitted that:- (i) ..... to providing a special tax regime to facilitate the securitization process. the explanatory memorandum accompanying the finance bill has adverted to the rationale for the proposed amendment as follows: taxation of securitisation trusts section 161 of the income-tax act provides that in case of a trust if its income consists of or includes profits and gains .....

Kingfisher Airlines Limited Vs. Capt. Prithvi Malhotra Instructor (Emp ...

Court : Mumbai

..... petition is employed by the petitioner as a pilot. all the respondents have filed applications under section 33(c)(2) of the i.d. act read with rule 62(2) of the industrial disputes (central) rules, 1957 in cgit-cum-labour court for recovery of their earned wages. they also seek interest on the earned wages at the rate ..... question of his own jurisdiction. 8). placing heavy reliance upon another decision of the apex court in the case of booz allen and hamilton inc. v/s. sbi home finance limited and others, reported in (2011) 5 scc page 532), mr. seervai submits that, every civil or commercial dispute is, in principle, capable of being adjudicated by ..... tq. wani, dist. yavatmal and anr. vs. 1. shri. sumit mullick, div. commissioner, amravati division, amravati, passed in writ petition no. 2613 of 2001 dated 28th september, 2012. 9). before touching upon the merits of the issue of arbitrability, it would be appropriate to find out as to who should decide that issue. should it be decided by .....

Shikshak Sahakari Bank Limited Vs. State of Maharashtra, Through Its P ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

..... decision of madras high court reported at 47 stc 273 (m/s. india tyre and rubber co. (india) pvt. ltd. .vrs. commercial tax officer ii, central assessment circle, madras and others). there effort was made by a third party to get itself impleaded as a party to the appeal filed by the assessee under tamil ..... it would approach the reserve bank of india for attaching the accounts of petitioner with it. petitioner bank immediately paid amount rs.10,22,844/- on 29.09.2012. 5. petitioners also state that they procured information from state excise department regarding licence possessed by the borrower establishment m/s. kamakshi resorts and as per communication dated ..... important to note that against the assessment orders petitioners filed appeals under section 55(7) of the bombay sales tax act, 1959 and those appeals have been dismissed by respondent no.5 vide order dated 31.10.2012, holding the same to be not maintainable. further common judgment delivered by the tribunal on 03.05.2013 again .....

ion Exchange Finance Ltd. Vs. Bombay Leasing Co. Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1999)101BOMLR150

..... winding up, other than voluntary winding relates back to the date of presentation of the petition for winding up.a learned single judge of this court in the case of central bank of india v. elmot engineering co. pvt. ltd. and ors. : [1994]3scr766 , has observed that the object of the section is to see that the ..... section 621 of the companies act, complaints for offences under the act can be filed except on a complaint by a registrar or of a shareholder of a company or a person authorised by the central government. permission of the company court is not required. under section 446(1) suit or other legal proceedings cannot be commenced without ..... the permission of the court. the language of section 621(1) will therefore indicate that the company court has no control over offences under the act except under section 545. .....

Santosh Maruti Walanj Vs. Manoj Sadashiv Jadhav

Court : Mumbai

..... later judgment which has been delivered by me in the case of dnyaneshwar m.satav vs. jalindhar dhondiba kharabi in writ petition no.88 of 2012 decided on 18/09/ 2012. the ambit and scope of the provisions in question, the nature of the proceedings are therefore peculiar. there is power to question the ..... school. in these circumstances, this land is not a government land and therefore the provisions themselves are not attracted. reliance is placed on this affidavit dated 15th june, 2012 exh. 'a' to this affidavit and equally 'b'. 11. reliance is also placed on the judgment of honble mr. justice b. p. dharmadhikari rendered in ..... such institution, concern or undertaking is financed wholly or substantially by funds provided directly or indirectly by the central government or by one or more state governments, or partly by the central government and partly by one or more state governments. 22 it is clear that the bombay village panchayats act, 1958, specifies encroachment on government land .....

Nandini J. Shah and Another Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India an ...

Court : Mumbai

..... son of vilasben. this being the composition of the companies, it could not be said that smt.vilasben shah had sublet the premises. the company state street capital finance was not even incorporated and did not come into existence. the estate officer and the courts below should have lifted the corporate veil to appreciate the true nature ..... m/s.jayant p.shah shipping tax counsels (appellant no.2) (the firm) and three private limited companies, i.e. (1) state street capital finance inc. (2) state street capital and finance private limited and (3) state street securities pvt.limited (the companies). notice was replied by vilasben vide letter dated 12 october 2004, and she denied the ..... the issue as to whether the petitions arising out of the orders passed under the public premises act should be heard by the division bench or single judge, to the full bench for consideration. the full bench in the case of prakashsecurities(2012 (4) bom.c.r.1)(supra) found that clause 3 of rule 18 of chapter xvii .....