Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2012 central chapter iii direct taxes Court: mumbai Page 77 of about 763 results (0.134 seconds)

Trajano D'Mello, Social Activist and Another Vs. State of Goa, through ...

Court : Mumbai Goa

..... its notice. 15. the apex court in the judgment reported in (2004) 2 scc 463 in the case of mehsana district central cooperative bank ltd and others v/s state of gujarat and others, has observed at para 16 thus: 16. in the ..... 379/1 of the same village. it is also their case that the respondents no. 4 and 5 are, in fact, financing the said project and that the said respondents, in collusion with the former office bearers of the temporary managing committee of the ..... without following due process of law and, as such, the petitioners have challenged the relevant order/letter dated 14.9.2012 and 15.10.2012, regularising/alloment/regularisation of the construction, together with other reliefs, which read thus : a. that this hon'ble court ..... a construction, without taking the comunidade into confidence, is wholly unjustified. the learned counsel further points out that the malafide acts on the part of the respondents no.4 and 5 cannot be condescend and such construction put up by the said respondents .....

Rajesh Tarachand Sajdeh Vs. Collector of Customs

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in : (1983)LC427DTri(Mum.)bai

..... extended to 6 months under notification g.s.r. 593 (e) dated 11-10-82 issued under section 50 of the finance (no. 2) act, 1980. from the ministry's letter dated 2-11-82 submitted by the advocate, it is seen that the revision petition ..... the appeal to the tribunal was received on 30-11-82. this is long after the period of 6 months stipulated under the customs, central excise & gold (control) removal of difficulties order, 1982 issued under g.s.r. 593 (e) dated 11-10-82. the appeal ..... been involved in a deliberate offence of smuggling watches and watch straps and the amount of penalty levied on him is justified. the central board of excise & customs in the order dated 27-3-82 has already taken a lenient view and reduced the amount of penalty ..... submissions of the advocate on the grounds that the original statement dated 14-8-80 was recorded under section 108 of the customs act. under provisions of this law, the person summoned was bound to state the truth and therefore the statement dated 14-8-80 .....

M/s. Nirlac Chemicals and Another Vs. Haffkine Bio-Pharmaceutical Corp ...

Court : Mumbai

..... . this, of course, does not mean that the state is not free to protect its interest as guardian of its finances. there could be no infringement of article 14 of the constitution of india if the government or its instrumentalities tried to ..... only with a view to favour respondent no.3. according to the petitioners, the entire tender process is in flagrant violation of central vigilance commission guidelines ( cvc guidelines ) relating to tenders floated by the government and its public sector undertakings, and hence, the ..... the year 2000 without any complaint. the details of the supply made by the petitioners to respondent no.1 from the year 2012 to 2015 have been set out by the petitioners in paragraph 4(d) of the petition. (e) it is thereafter ..... 2016. to conclude, ms srivastav submitted that there are no irregularities in the tender process and respondent no.1 has acted in a transparent, fair and honest manner not only in the process but also in awarding the contract to respondent no. .....