Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2012 central chapter iii direct taxes Court: mumbai Page 51 of about 763 results (0.097 seconds)

In Re: Europlast India Ltd. a Company Incorporated Under Companies Act ...

Court : Mumbai

..... interim stay to the proceedings in cr no. 45 of 2000 pending in the court of the special judge under the maharashtra protection of interest of depositors (finance establishment) act, 1999 was granted by this court(bobde,j.) on 9.6.2000. shri rego submits that the criminal proceedings which are pending before the special court ..... affidavits. rajeev khandelwal has neither appeared nor bothered to file any response. from the affidavit filed by mr. ramesh vaze, it transpires that mr. rajeev khandelwal was the central figure, who was involved in the negotiations with 'k' company, presumably projecting himself to be the director of 'g' company. at the same time, the new directors ..... its registered address. similarly, 'g' company changed its registered address. it is then stated that 'k' company after purchase of suit property had applied for grant of central excise license at panvel, when they were informed that 'e' company owed a sum of rs. 32 lakhs to the collector and until that amount was paid, .....

Hindustan Antibiotics Limited and Others Vs. M/S. Kirloskar Investment ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1999(2)ALD(Cri)404; 1999(5)BomCR264; 1999BomCR(Cri)264; (1999)1BOMLR899; 1999(2)MhLj609

..... fifteen days of the receipt of the said notice the offence is complete. complaint has to be filed within the terms stipulated under the act. s.i.c.a. is also a central legislation enacted in the year 1985 which came into force with effect from 12-1-1987. the amendment which was referred to namely ..... 18 which includes section 138 was inserted by the banking public financial institutions and negotiable instrument laws (amendment) act, 1988 with effect from 1-4-1989. it is a central legislation. section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, requires that where a cheque drawn by a person on an account maintained by him with a banker for ..... puts an embargo on suing. the explanation to section 138 of the negotiable instruments act, does not have the effect or making ineffective the provisions of section 138 of the negotiable instruments act. when there are two central legislations in the field, both acts of parliament it is presumed that parliament was aware of the position. learned counsel .....

Mazgaon Dock Limited Vs. Association of Engineering and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1989(3)BomCR593

..... its financial incapacity to bear the burden on account of the existing dearness allowance system which the company wanted to replace. the bleak picture of its finances in future was painted by the company in the context of the workmen's demands which had nothing to do with the company's demand. the tribunal ..... wage level. we may reproduce here the relevant passages from the report of the 'dearness allowance commission on the question of the grant of dearness allowance to central government employees in future' (1967). while commenting on the recommendations of the first and the second pay commissions, the dearness allowance commission observes :'for us, ..... was taken into consideration was the minimum wage in non-scheduled industries (that is those industries which were not mentioned in the schedule to the minimum wages act). this was done because the minimum wages in the non-scheduled industries were fixed as a result of collective bargaining, arbitration or adjudication. the commission .....

Shamrao Vithal Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Star Glass Works

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR583; 2003(3)BomCR347; [2003]114CompCas378(Bom); [2003]42SCL769(Bom)

..... 1987]3scr481 , (iii) bolani ores ltd. v. stale of orissa : [1975]2scr138 , (iv) onkarlal nandlalv. state of rajasthan : air1986sc2146 , (v) reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance & investment co. ltd. : [1987]2scr1 , (vi) p. kasilingam v. p.s.g. college of technology : air1995sc1395 , (vii) ichchapur industrial co-operative society's case (supra} and ..... steels (p.) ltd. v. dy. cit [1999] 4 scc 313 (iv) onkarlal nandlal v. state of rajasthan : air1986sc2146 , (v) reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance [1997] 1 scc 424 (vi) mayor, aldermen & burgesses of the borough of portsmouth & charles bovill smith h.l. (e) (vol. x) 1885 and (vii) co-operative ..... operative banks and the more important primary non-agricultural co-operative banks certain provisions of the existing central laws which are relatable to 'banking'.'from the careful and, conjoint reading of the banking regulation act, act of 1993 and the respective preamble, objectives and reasons, it would be clear that the co .....

Mahindra and Mahindra Ltd. and ors. Etc. Etc. Vs. Mr. Avinash D. Kambl ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR1; 2008(2)BomCR497; (2008)110BOMLR805; 2008(4)MhLj125; 1996(72)FLR166

..... a situation, where by misapplying judicial precedent, the bureaucracy had contributed to a burgeoning work force in the government, with a bulging pressure on the scarce finances of the state for developmental activities. judicial precedent was hijacked for sanctifying back-door entries in public employment. in fact this was the refrain in the ..... bargaining power and accepting appointments on such terms as are offered as fait accompli has been recognized by the apex court as far back as in 1986 in central inland water transport v. b.n. ganguli reported in : (1986)iillj171sc . observations in paragraphs 89 and 100 of the said judgment may be usefully ..... claim about the duties and responsibilities being dis-similar. 44. his learned adversary submitted that sub-section (18) of section 3 of the bombay industrial relations act transcends even article 14 of the constitution when it mandates that 'industrial matter' means any matter relating to employment, work, wages, hours of work, privileges, .....

Nagpur District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Divisional ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1971Bom365

..... under the maharashtra co-operative societies act 1960 having its registered office at nagpur. it does banking business and is known as a central co-operative bank within the meaning of that expression used in the reserve bank of india act, 1934. the primary object of this society is to finance the other co-operative societies in ..... the district and is now covered by the banking regulation act, 1949 as amended by the. ..... 1970 is challenged by the petitioners as being without jurisdiction and the petitioners pray that section 78 of the maharashtra co-operative societies act, 1960 be declared as not applicable to the central cooperative banks and that the divisional joint registrar, co-operative societies, has no jurisdiction to initiate any action under section 78 .....

The Commissioner of Customs (Preventive) Vs. Noble Asset Co. Ltd. and ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(5)BomCR25; 2008(131)ECC102; 2008(157)LC102(Bombay); 2008(230)ELT22(Bom)

..... july, 1997. this is a notification issued in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 4 of the customs act, 1962 whereby the central government has appointed officers to be commissioner of customs, deputy commissioner of customs and assistant commissioner of customs for the area mentioned in corresponding entry ..... continental shelf india has and exercised sovereign rights for the purposes of exploration, exploitation, conservation and management of all resources. under section 7(6) the central government can declare any area of the exclusive economic zone to be a designated area. by virtue of section 7(9) in the exclusive economic zone ..... into the contiguous zone and the continental shelf, subject to the limitations imposed as per the maritime zones act, 1976 and the notifications issued by the ministry of external affairs and the ministry of finance. it is submitted placing reliance on the maharashtra state gazetteer that the distance to be covered under territorial .....

Pandharinath Bhikaji Telge Vs. the Appropriate Authority and ors.

Court : Mumbai

..... , but an amount of `18,70,340/-. 33. this is clearly contrary to the mandate of sections 269ud(1) and 269uf(1) of the it act which enjoins upon the central govt. to pay by way of consideration for the purchase, an amount equal to the amount of apparent consideration. consequently therefore the quantum of deposit made by ..... anything contained in sub-section (1), if any dispute arises as to the apportionment of the amount of consideration amongst persons claiming to be entitled thereto, the central government shall deposit with the appropriate authority the amount of consideration required to be tendered under sub- section (1) within the period specified therein. sub-section (3 ..... writ petition nos. 2191 and 2192 of 2010). respondent no.1 is the appropriate authority under chapter xx-c of the it act, 1961 and respondent no.2 is the union of india through ministry of finance. inasmuch as the petitions raise common questions of facts and law, they are being disposed of by this common judgment. 3 .....

Bombay Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India and 14 Others

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992LC278(Bombay); 1982(10)ELT171(Bom)

..... these findings, the appeals came to be dismissed.7. the petitioners preferred revision petition to the government of india, ministry of finance (department of revenue), new delhi as provided under section 131 of the customs act on march 2, 1976. in the meanwhile, on february 6, 1976, the petitioners addressed a letter to the d.g. ..... 1968 notification ------------ customso.s.h. no. in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 25 of the customs act, 1962 (52 of 1962), the central government, being satisfied that it is necessary in the ..... item no. 28 of the first schedule to the indian tariff act, 1934. as the claim in the petition centres round upon the terms of this notification, it would be convenient to set out the relevant portion at this stage : 'government of india ministry of finance (department of revenue and insurance) new delhi, the 1st march, .....

Polynova Industries Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1995(3)BomCR13

..... where the question for decision turned on the interpretation and construction of the expression 'in the manufacture of goods' in section 8(3)(b) of the central sales tax act, 1956. in paragraph 8 of the report the supreme court observed :---'the expression in the manufacture of goods should normally encompass the entire process carried on ..... it is subject to the payment of customs duty. the product thus manufactured by the first petitioner falls under chapter 59 of the schedule to the central excise tariff act which comes under the heading 'impregnated, coated, covered or laminated textile fabrics; textile articles of a kind suitable for industrial use'.under heading no. ..... out that the matter was carried by the revenue in appeal before the supreme court and the supreme court in the decision of union of india v. kamlakshi finance corporation ltd., reported in : 1991ecr486(sc) , rejected the contention of the revenue and for that matter even upheld the strictures made. mr. usgaokar thereafter .....