Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2011 central chapter vi miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 51 of about 506 results (0.444 seconds)

M. Krishnasamy Vs. the Member Secretary of Chennai Metropolitan Develo ...

Court : Chennai

..... 27. after a spurt in developmental activities, the cmda felt a need for a second master plan for the chennai metropolitan area. therefore, a draft second master plan 2011 was prepared and submitted to the government and the government gave its consent to it under g.o.ms.no.59, housing and urban development department, dated 30.6 ..... development control rules with certain modifications. they were issued by the government in exercise of the power conferred by section 32(4) of the tamil nadu town and country planning act, 1971. 22. by the amendment so made to the development control rules, sub-rules (b) and (c) were inserted under rule 19. while sub-rule (b) ..... came into existence. hence it is presented as follows:- (i) section 9-c, chapter ii-a of the tamil nadu town and country planning (amendment) act, 1973 (tamil nadu act no.22 of 1974) prescribed that the madras metropolitan development authority shall carry out a survey of madras metropolitan area and prepare a master plan as referred to .....

Ram Kaashyap Investment Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of Indi ...

Court : Chennai

..... same are being heard and disposed of. he has also in this connection refers to the notification of the government dated 05.12.2011 issued by the government of india, ministry of finance, department of economic affairs, issued in respect of sitting of appellate tribunal against temporary absence of presiding officer, till the assumption of ..... against that, an appeal has to be filed before the appellate tribunal. further section 29 of the act, 1992, enables the government to make rules for carrying out the purposes of the act and the notification issued by the central government under rule 5(2) is valid in law. the petitioners herein have not challenged the rules ..... i am to hold that these two writ petitions are not maintainable before this court and the petitioners have to avail the statutory appellate remedy available under the act. 15.in the result, both the writ petitions are dismissed as not maintainable. no costs. consequently, other miscellaneous petitions are closed. liberty is given to .....

Karuppusamy Vs. K.C.Palanisamy

Court : Chennai

..... onus or blame on his counsel. based on the plea of doctrine of 'equity' a person seeking a discretionary relief under section 5 of the limitation act should act diligently. 28.the plea of limitation does give rise to an advantage in law is to the other side. but the condonation of such delay under section ..... is no presumption that delay in approaching the court is always deliberate. this court has held that the words ".sufficient cause". under section 5 of the limitation act should receive a liberal construction so as to advance substantial justice vide shakuntala devi jain versus kuntal kumari [air1969sc575 and state of west bengal versus the administrator, howrah ..... the high court of judicature at madras dated: 11.06.2013 coram: the honourable mr.justice m.venugopal c.r.p.pd.no.1033 of 2011 and m.p.no.1 of 2011 1.karuppusamy 2.k.balakrishnan .petitioners/petitioners/defendants versus k.c.palanisamy .respondent/respondent/plaintiff prayer: petitions filed under article 227 of the constitution .....

P. Elangovan Vs. Pondevaki and Others

Court : Chennai Madurai

..... petitioner, filed the petition under section 125 cr.pc claiming maintenance of rs.21,000/- per month from her sons and daughter. her husband late ponraj had been employed in central co-operative bank, madurai and he died while he was in service on 14.03.1989. at the instigation of the maternal grandmother, the two sons did not maintain cordial ..... was interested only in grabbing the property; as she was causing disturbance to the possession of the house, the first respondent filed a suit in o.s.no.1116 of 2011 seeking an order of injunction; the first respondent has also filed a suit for partition before the principal sub-court, madurai, in o.s.no.960 of 2012, as the ..... dignity of women. mahatma gandhi said civilisation is that mode of conduct which points out to man the path of duty. a duty is roughly speaking an act which one ought to do, an act, the opposite of which would be a wrong. r.w.m.dias speaks in different manner, a duty is a species of obligation and defines that, duties .....

P.N. Kanagaraj Vs. the Chief Secretary, State of Tamil Nadu and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (2008)8MLJ1085

..... ,000/- (rupees five lakhs only) shall be invested in the name of lakshmi in a fixed deposit, initially for a period of three years, with tamil nadu power finance corporation and she would be entitled to receive the interest accrues on such deposit once in three months. the remaining amount shall be released to the appellant and his wife ..... court admitted the writ petition on 20.10.2005. in spite of receipt of the notice in the writ petition, the respondents 1 to 5 have not chosen to act in any manner. this attitude and mindset of the respondents 1 to 5 show an indifferent disposition of mind, without realising the responsibility reposed on them. in such circumstances ..... observed that:in the matter of liability of the state for the torts committed by its employees, it is now the settled law that the state is liable for tortious acts committed by its employees in the course of their employment.13. in state of rajasthan v. vidhyawati 1962 supp (2) scr 989 : : air1962sc933 it has been held that: .....

Jeddiya Sathya Alias Sathya Vs. 01.The Superintendent of Police

Court : Chennai

..... stage of election. the second stage of election is for pastorate committee, namely, office bearers of various sub committees like finance sub-committee, elementary school sub-committee, sub- committee for mission and evangelism. even representatives to the church council from ..... they would not fall under the instrumentality or agency of the state or statutory body of the state government or central government, by order dated 31.7.2013, vacated the interim injunction and refused to exercise the extraordinary jurisdiction to ..... rely upon the judgment of the apex court in the case of kalabharati advertising v. hemant vimalnath narichania and others, 2011 (5) ctc221 wherein the apex court has held that a party cannot have the benefit of interim order after withdrawing ..... since the court cannot be used only for interim relief alone. indeed the maxim ".actus curiae neminem gravabit". - an act of the court shall prejudice no man, becomes applicable in this case also. in such a situation, this court is .....