Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2011 central chapter vi miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 45 of about 506 results (0.125 seconds)

Feb 08 2013 (HC)

D.Thomas Franco Rajendradev Vs. Disciplinary Authority Sbi

Court : Chennai

..... term which may extend to six months with or without fine. 7.even earlier when such issues came up, the finance minister of the government of india had assured the house that section 36ad will not be used against the trade union ..... of 5 day week banking in line with the international banking practice. this issue was raised several times including in the central negotiation council meeting. the management representatives had assured that they are looking into the matter and will resolve the issue. ..... where the allegations levelled against the petitioner are with regard to exceeding the rights available to them, which has resulted in acts of misconduct and for the same if a departmental inquiry is being conducted, it is not proper for this court to ..... effective steps were taken by the management to resolve the issue till 2011. therefore, the federation of bank officers gave a strike notice to be scheduled on 8th and 9th november, 2011. on the basis of the assurance given at that time by the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 01 2013 (HC)

United India Insurance Co Ltd Vs. V.Giriprasath

Court : Chennai

..... university, ex.p14 identity card issued by kongu engineering college, ex.p15 statement of accounts for genera advance for the period from 01.01.2010 to 21.11.2011, ex.p16 canara bank pass book, ex.p17 kongu engineering college bus receipt, ex.p18 kongu engineering college transfer certificate, ex.p19 junior red cross erode education ..... claims tribunal, (chief judicial magistrate court), erode, the present appeal has been filed.2. short facts leading to the appeal are as follows: that on 27.01.2011, about 18.30 hours, while the respondent/claimant was riding a moped, bearing registration not tn 3.l 3731.on solangapalayam to palanigoundenpalayam road, near kolkarar's ..... , for the reason that the notional income under the schedule to section 163-a of the act, has been fixed on 14.11.1994 and despite the directions issued by the supreme court in a catena of decisions, the central government have not brought about any amendment.15. while estimating the pecuniary losses, the courts/tribunals .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 08 2013 (HC)

Tnpl Annal Ambedkar Tholilalar Sangham Vs. Secretary to Government of ...

Court : Chennai

..... the ministry of personnel, public grievances and pensions, department of personnel & training vide their office memorandum dated 21.3.2011 had also declared 14.04.2011 as a closed holiday for all central government offices including industrial establishments throughout india. notwithstanding the same, by not declaring a public holiday on 14.04.2012 ..... second respondent company in terms of the g.o.ms.no.911, public (misc) department, dated 20.10.2011 under the negotiable instruments act, 1881. subsequently, they filed m.p.no.1 of 2011 amending the prayer seeking for a direction to the respondent to provide a public holiday to all employees and ..... central nor by the state government. it is submitted that this respondent is not a government company and it is only a public limited company registered under the provisions of the companies act 1956. since shareholding by government is only 35.32%, the government of tamil nadu has clarified vide letter no.3007/bpe/97 dated 22.10.1997 of finance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 23 2014 (HC)

1.Dr.K.A.Kuppusamy Vs. 1.The Secretary,

Court : Chennai

..... nit, kurukshetra and nit, jalandhar, were not covered by any pension scheme, though the board of governors of these two institutes had ratified the recommendations of the finance committee for introduction of the pension scheme on the state government pattern with effect from 01.04.1994. the learned assistant solicitor general of india would submit that because ..... appearing for the petitioners in w.p.(md)nos.14385 and 6289 of 2011, would submit that the said stand taken by the central government cannot be correct for several reasons. firs.of all, the learned senior counsel would submit that after the nit act had come into being, in exercise of the powers conferred under sub-section ..... proposal. in the said proceedings, the central government has stated as follows: ?.i am directed to refer to your letter no.amg-ii/ir/ddo (cash)/hrd/2008-09/912 dated 17.02.2011 on the above subject and to state that the matter was taken up with the integrated finance division of this ministry. ifd has since .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 21 2014 (HC)

P.Raman Vs. Government of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... 10-11-2008: table-i sl. no.name of post educational qualification prescribed (as on 10.11.2008) 1 assistant section officer (other than law & finance department) in the tamil nadu secretariat service a master's degree or a bachelor's degree and bgl degree or a bachelor's degree with first class in ..... of certiorarified mandamus calling for all relevant records relating to the impugned order published in the official website of the first respondent service commission, dated 10.05.2011, rejecting the application of the selected candidates, placed in the withheld list of the combined subordinate services examination i, 2008 (group-ii), without proper notice, ..... chairman, tamil nadu public service commission, for the purpose:- a degree of any of the universities incorporated by an act of the central or state legislature in india or any other educational institutions established by an act of parliament or declared to be deemed as a university under section 3 of the university grants commission .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 2014 (HC)

S.Kumar Vs. 1.The District Collector,

Court : Chennai

..... appearing for the petitioner in the second writ petition, mr.h.velavadhas, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the firs.writ petition, mr.a.saravanan, learned central government standing counsel appearing for the union of india, which is the 1st respondent in the second writ petition, mr.m.govindan, learned special government pleader appearing ..... sensitive areas and activities which have to be regulated or prohibited were presented in the form of a tabular column in annexure-1 to those guidelines, dated 09.02.2011. insofar as the activity ".commercial mining". is concerned, annexure-1 indicates that it is totally prohibited. in other words, it is neither regulated nor permitted but ..... by the ministry of environment and forests, in exercise of the powers conferred by section 3(1)(v) and section 3(2) of the environment (protection) act, 1986, it will be clear that even if the mining project is to be carried out in an area less than five hectares, clearance from the state .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 02 2014 (HC)

1. Thangaraj @ Thamilarasan Vs. State by

Court : Chennai

..... ".; and (b) the reference in sub-section (2) thereof, to ".the state government". shall be construed as a reference to ".the central government or the state government, as the case may be".. (4) nothing in section 438 of the code shall apply in relation to any ..... look out for the activities of suspicious persons while they were engaged in guard duty near lakshmi illam, the place wherein the former finance minister thiru.p.chidambaram used to stay on his visit to the said place and that at that point of time, they ..... such judgments and suffice to refer to the judgment of the kerala high court in ashruff v state of kerala reported in 2011 crl l.j.1021 and that of a larger bench of the honourable supreme court consisting of the honourable the then chief ..... petitioners chose to file a petition under section 167(2) cr.p.c. r/w 43-d of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 act praying for their release on statutory bail. the said petition came to be filed on 05.07.2014 and the same was taken .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 27 2015 (HC)

M/s. Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Pvt Limited Vs. The Commissioner ...

Court : Chennai

..... made. the same was given effect by notification dated 20.01.2014.whereas, under the cblr, 2013 having found the necessity to prescribe a period, the central board, the statutory authority had included the same in the regulations itself, when they were brought into force. therefore, when a time limit is prescribed in regulations ..... is untenable. in support of his contentions, the learned counsel has relied upon the judgments made in tax appeal no.159/2006, dated 17.07.2012 (sapthagiri finance and investments vs. income tax officer), writ appeal no.371/2015, 2014, dated 17.06.2015 (the commissioner of customs vs. a.m.ahmed and co.), ..... alleged that the petitioner filed bill of entry of mis-declared goods during the period april 2011 to september 2013, on behalf of their importers, wherein the goods were allegedly undervalued. further, it was alleged that the petitioner acted as customs broker without authorisation and without verification of the antecedents and credentials of the importers, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2016 (HC)

Sheik Madhani Lafir Vs. Senior Intelligence Officer, Directorate of Re ...

Court : Chennai

..... no.996/3/2015- cx dated 28.02.2015 relied on by the petitioner relates to the arrears of duty of central exercise recoverable from manufacturers and in the instant case on hand, the petitioner/accused is a chinese passport holder, who attempted ..... the proceedings is quite contrary of law. 5. the learned counsel for the petitioner emphatically submits that the ministry of finance in circular no.27/2015 dated 23.10.2015 with retrospective effect had mentioned a fact that the government of india ..... prosecution as per decision of the hon'ble supreme court of india in radhey shyam kejriwal v. state of west bengal reported in (2011) 3 scc 581. also, the stand of the petitioner is that the 'criminal prosecution' and 'adjudication proceedings' are independent in ..... the contention of the learned special public prosecutor for the respondent that the tamil nadu government issued a detention order under cofeposa act, 1974 vide g.o.s.r.no.1/570-2/2009 dated 14.10.2009 against the petitioner and since he .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 12 2015 (HC)

Community Action for Rural Vs. 1.The Secretary,

Court : Chennai

..... submission, the learned counsel for the respondents relied on the following judgments: (i) m/s.shriram city union finance corporation ltd., vs. rama mishra [air2002sc2402, wherein in paragraph 12, it has been held as follows:"2. hence ..... 74; m.k.ranganathan v. madras electric tramways (1904) ltd., air1952mad.659; aswini kumar sinha v. deputy collector of central excise and land customs, air1952ass.91. it was subba rao, j.(as the learned chief justice then was) who observed ..... district collector, pudukottai district and others [2010 (1) cwc108. (v) a.gnanaboominathan vs. the district collector, ramanathapuram and another [2011 (1) cwc555.29. for the above reasons, i hold that (a) this court has jurisdiction to entertain the present writ petition ..... proceedings. it is for the revision petitioner/plaintiff to work out his remedy under the provisions of the arbitration act. there is no manifest illegality in the impugned order warranting intervention and hence, the civil revision petition is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //