Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2011 central chapter vi miscellaneous Court: chennai Page 14 of about 506 results (0.297 seconds)

Sai enterprises Vs. Customs Central Excise and Service Tax Settlement ...

Court : Chennai

..... high court while exercising jurisdiction under article 226 should be slow in upsetting or interfering with such finding. 7. the window given under the customs act by inserting chapter xiva by finance act 1998, is to give a reprieve to an applicant who comes forward before the commission by making full and true disclosure and this commission was ..... 2015 in his individual capacity and the challenge in both the writ petitions are to the common order passed by the settlement commission under the customs and central excise act. the directorate of revenue intelligence issued a show cause notice, dated 13.04.2013, to the petitioners herein as well as to a private limited company ..... notice, all the four noticees except m/s.rukmani explosives, filed separate applications before the settlement commission on 26.03.2014 under section 127b of the customs act, 1962 (act). the applications were numbered as s.a.(cus) no.15 to 19/2014-sc. the receipt of the applications were acknowledged by the office of the .....

State of Tamil Nadu Vs. Aicte

Court : Chennai

..... and 40% for reserved category. it is stated that the state government is bound by the norms that have been fixed by the central authority established under the central act in respect of professional courses and higher education, and power has been carved out for the state government only to increase the eligibility ..... to consider various aspects such as shortage of rural literacy, financial constraints of the students, etc. moreover, the aicte has approved about 400 self-financing engineering colleges throughout the state including the rural areas, and therefore, the state government considering the above aspects framed a policy to admit the students belonging ..... hospital, air 200.sc 30065) m.nagaraj vs. union of india, 2006 (8) scc 216) visveswaraiah technical university and others vs. krishnendu halder & others 2011 (4) scc 606.18. mr.l.chandrakumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the writ petition, while adopting the arguments of the learned advocate general, submitted .....

Zenith Lamps and Electricals Ltd. Vs. the Registrar, High Court and or ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1968)1MLJ37

..... jumble of statutory and case-law which, at many points, is indefeasible on principle and is a source of all-round inconvenience. the suits valuation act, 1887 (central act vii of 1887) makes its own contribution to the incongruities with which this branch of the law abounds. rationalization of the law relating to court-fees ..... is not always that recovery is possible from the defeated defendant.82. further figures have been placed before us by the deputy secretary to government in the finance department (sri shivakumar) in a supplemental counter-affidavit. we shall first examine the figures furnished in the affidavit of sri kelu erady, joint secretary to government ..... certain sum of money should be expended in enhancing the salaries of ministerial officers and judicial officers. this proposal involved extra expenditure of several lakhs and the finances of the country could then ill-afford to bear the additional burden. to find ways and means, a commission was appointed with the object to derive .....

M/S. Loyola Institute of Business Administration (Liba) Vs. Commission ...

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

..... appellants treating the appellants as a commercial training or coaching centre. she states that the definition of commercial training or coaching centre as given in the finance act, 1994, excludes many institutes or establishment which issues any certificate or diploma or degree or any educational qualification recognized by law for the time being in ..... earlier before the original authority. 5. considering the submissions from both sides and having regard to the definition of commercial training or coaching centre under the finance act, 1994, we are of the view that since the documents now produced by the appellants were not before the original authority, they are required to ..... 1. heard both sides. 2. the miscellaneous application filed by the revenue is for change of cause title, wherein the respondent has been shown as commissioner of central excise, chennai iv. shri p. arul, learned ar, submits that the matter being of service tax, the same is being dealt with by the commissioner of .....

E.R.Jothieswari Vs. Sarojini.

Court : Chennai

..... orders issued. in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 22-a of the registration act, 1908 (central act vxi of 1908) read with section 15 of the tamil nadu general clauses act, 1891 (tamil nadu act 1 of 1891) the government of tamil nadu hereby revokes the commercial taxes department notification issued in g.o.ms. ..... this court in the case of m.muthu gangai anandi and others vs. the sub registrar, nallur, tripur district and others (w.p.no.17400 of 2011) decided on 01.12.2011, laying down as under: "9. in the decision relied on by the learned counsel for the petitioners, the question referred was, whether unilateral cancellation ..... unilateral cancellation of gift deed, by placing reliance on the judgment of the hon'ble full bench of this court in latif estate line india limited v. hadeeja ammal, 2011 (2) ctc 1, laying down as under: "20. on the issue of public policy and registration laws, learned counsel contended that the government of tamil nadu .....

Cst, Chennai Vs. M/S. State Bank of India, Kilpauk

Court : Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Chennai

..... made available), that the sbi is a govt. bank, that it is collecting service tax for the department etc., are extraneous to determine limitation under section 73 of the finance act, 1994. on the other hand, the sbi should be a model tax payer and to prove their bonafies, they should have promptly paid up the small amount of ..... . after hearing both sides, i find that the law relating to limitation in the context of service tax has been well spelt out under section 73 of the finance act, 1994. it provides that longer period of limitation can be invoked if service tax has not been paid by reason of (a) fraud; or (b) collusion; or ( ..... the said circular. he cites the decision of the honble supreme court in the case of pushpam pharmaceuticals co. vs. collector of central excise, bombay - 1995 (78) elt 401 (sc), which holds that the act of the assessees must be deliberate to invoke longer period of limitation. he supports the impugned order passed by the lower appellate authority. 5 .....

R. Vinothkumar Vs. the Secretary, Selection Committee and 3 ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1995(1)CTC401; (1995)IIMLJ158

..... that the amounts of the cheques were received by it (assessee) at indore.(g) on the application of the commissioner of income-tax central bombay, under section 66(1) of the it. act, the tribunal referred the following question of law to the bombay high court:-'whether the assessee-company is liable to pay tax in the ..... -tax appellate tribunal was right in the conclusion to which it came and accordingly dismissed the appeals.14. in indore m.u. mills v. i.t. commissioner (central) bombay air 1966 sc 1466, the assessee/appellant, during the relevant accounting years, was a non-resident. it carried on the business of manufacturing textiles goods at indore ..... admission to the first year bachelor of physiotherapy course for the academic year 1994-95 against free seat in any one of the self-financing institutions at madras or any other private self-financing institution conducting b.p.t. course, against a free seat, within a specified date.(a) learned single judge dismissed the said writ petition .....

R. Sankarasubbu Vs. the Commissioner of Police Egmore Chennai and Othe ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 2013(1)CTC1; 2013(1)MLJ(Crl)1; 2013(1)LW(Cri)1

..... shall immediately hand-over the entire case papers in crime no.926/2011 on his file to the joint director, central bureau of investigation, chennai. the director of central bureau of investigation, new delhi shall nominate officer/officers to conduct the investigation and the investigation is to be commenced ..... para 7 reads as follows:- 7. in the circumstances, we transfer the investigation of the case registered in crime no.926/2011 on thefile of v-5, thirumangalam police station, chennai, to central bureau of investigation with immediate effect. the second respondent, namely, the inspector of police, v-5, thirumangalam police station, chennai, ..... of forensic experts. he had also filed m.p.no.2 of 2011 seeking transfer of investigation of the case to the central bureau of investigation. m.p.no.1 of 2011 was heard by the division bench on 14.06.2011 and in the said miscellaneous petition, the division bench directed constitution of .....

Leaap International Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Service Tax

Court : Chennai

..... order of the commissioner, central excise (13.4.2011), assessee filed appeal before cestat in st/475/2011 on the ground that there is no question of any service tax and once the dispute is on legal ..... service under section 65(19((iv) read with section 65(105)(zzb) of finance act. assessee sent a detailed reply (03.01.2011) to the show cause notice (12.01.2010). objection of the assessee was rejected and by the order dated 13.04.2011, the commissioner of central excise confirmed the demand of service tax of rs.1,38,23,529/- being ..... the service tax on the business auxiliary service rendered during the period october 2004 to december 2008 and also imposed penalty of rs.1,38,23,529/- under section 78 of finance act.4. being aggrieved by the .....

M.Arumugam Vs. State of Tamil Nadu

Court : Chennai

..... about the validity of the kerala chitties act, 1975, which had the requisite presidential assent, became void and stood pro tanto repealed on account of the central legislation chit fund act, 1982. in the circumstances, the kerala finance act 7 of 2002 introducing section 4(1)(a) in kerala chitties act, 1975, was also void, as the ..... any provision of any law relating to co-operative societies in force in a state immediately before the commencement of the constitution (ninety-seventh amendment) act, 2011, which is inconsistent with the provisions of this part, shall continue to be in force until amended or repealed by a competent legislature or other ..... interferes with the democratic set up, democratic control and professional management of the co-operative societies; hence against the spirit of the constitution (97th amendment) act, 2011. the admission of new members is the prerogative of the governing body, which is empowered under the byelaw to do so. hence, the amendment interferes with .....