Court : Jharkhand
..... to initially issue directions on certain specific issues in the present order within a judicially manageable framework. 22. in these circumstances, we hold that section 24b vests administrative control over the state commissions in the president of the national commission and over the district fora in the presidents of the ..... s. jagarnathpur, district ranchi 3. secretary, department of law (justice), government of jharkhand, project building, p.o. dhurwa, p.s. jagarnathpur, district ranchi 4. secretary, finance department, government of jharkhand, project building, p.o. dhurwa, p.s. jagarnathpur, district ranchi 5. jharkhand state consumer disputes redressal commission, p.o. & p.s. ..... constitute a sobering reflection of how far removed reality lies from the goals and objectives which parliament had in view while enacting the consumer protection act, 1986. the committee has observed that the fora constituted under the enactment do not function as effectively as expected due to a poor .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... of the respondent nos.1 to 4, wherein it has been stated that in exercise of powers vested in it by the relevant section of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000, the jharkhand state housing board (hereinafter referred to as jshb) has framed jharkhand state housing board service regulation 2013 and the ..... 2015 to incorporate certain other provisions in the draft rules. thereafter, urban development and housing department vide letter dated 30.11.2015 intimated the opinion of the finance department to the managing director, jharkhand state housing board. therefore, only after the approval of both the departments i.e. the personnel, administrative reforms and ..... been 6 framed and approval of departmental minister is being sought. soon after the approval of departmental minister, the proposal would be sent to planning-cum-finance, personnel department and the law department for approval.11. a supplementary affidavit dated 21.06.2016 has been filed by the petitioner, wherein vide annexure-ix .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... of the respondent nos.1 to 4, wherein it has been stated that in exercise of powers vested in it by the relevant section of the jharkhand state housing board act, 2000, the jharkhand state housing board (hereinafter referred to as jshb) has framed jharkhand state housing board service regulation 2013 and the ..... 2015 to incorporate certain other provisions in the draft rules. thereafter, urban development and housing department vide letter dated 30.11.2015 intimated the opinion of the finance department to the managing director, jharkhand state housing board. therefore, only after the approval of both the departments i.e. the personnel, administrative reforms and ..... been 6 framed and approval of departmental minister is being sought. soon after the approval of departmental minister, the proposal would be sent to planning-cum-finance, personnel department and the law department for approval.11. a supplementary affidavit dated 21.06.2016 has been filed by the petitioner, wherein vide annexure-ix .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... no. 54 of 2017 bichitra nanda dash, s/o late mukunda dash appellant versus union of india through the secretary, ministry of finance, department of financial services, new delhi & anr. respondents ----- coram: hon ble the acting chief justice hon ble mr. justice ananda sen ----- for the appellant : m/s rajiv ranjan, sr. advocate pandey neeraj rai ..... the appellant is going to superannuate today itself at 12:00 noon. learned counsel for the appellant submitted that as section 6 of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 has been substituted, it will be deemed that the appellant will be entitled to hold the office of the ..... of service on 10.04.2018. thus, interpretation of section 28 of the enforcement of security interest and recovery of debts laws and miscellaneous provisions (amendment) act, 2016 is necessary to decide the entire appeal. section 28 of the amended act, 2016 substitutes section 6 of the principal act. the appellant is the presiding officer of d.r .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... vehicle which was sold to the petitioner was a test drive vehicle the warranty period for a test drive vehicle as could be deciphered from the terms and conditions of financing the test drive vehicle is for a period of six months. the complaint petition thus does not reveal any mens- ria on the part of the petitioner as a perusal ..... their reply it could be deciphered that the vehicle which was sold to the opposite party no. 2 was indeed a test drive vehicle. it has been stated that the act of the petitioners do suggest an offence of criminal breach of trust and cheating as well as forgery and therefore the learned court below has properly appreciated the materials available .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... vehicle which was sold to the petitioner was a test drive vehicle the warranty period for a test drive vehicle as could be deciphered from the terms and conditions of financing the test drive vehicle is for a period of six months. the complaint petition thus does not reveal any mens- ria on the part of the petitioner as a perusal ..... their reply it could be deciphered that the vehicle which was sold to the opposite party no. 2 was indeed a test drive vehicle. it has been stated that the act of the petitioners do suggest an offence of criminal breach of trust and cheating as well as forgery and therefore the learned court below has properly appreciated the materials available .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... singh chadha v. sudhir mehra reported in (2001) 7 scc417 9. learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has referred to the case of citicorp. maruti finance ltd. v. s. vijayalaxmi reported in (2012 air scw251to substantiate his contention that the financier company was not empowered to execute the agreement. it appears that in the ..... ).4. it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no criminal case is made out against the petitioners who are the officials of srei equipment finance ltd. it has further been submitted the entire dispute is with respect to non fulfillment of the terms and conditions of hire purchase agreement relating to pokelaine machine ..... to repossess the vehicle in question in the eye of law and the act of repossession of the vehicle is itself a criminal act. in support of his argument, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has referred to the judgment passed in citicorp. maruti finance ltd. v. s. vijayalaxmi reported in (2012 air scw251 6. it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... singh chadha v. sudhir mehra reported in (2001) 7 scc417 9. learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has referred to the case of citicorp. maruti finance ltd. v. s. vijayalaxmi reported in (2012 air scw251to substantiate his contention that the financier company was not empowered to execute the agreement. it appears that in the ..... ).4. it has been submitted by learned counsel for the petitioners that no criminal case is made out against the petitioners who are the officials of srei equipment finance ltd. it has further been submitted the entire dispute is with respect to non fulfillment of the terms and conditions of hire purchase agreement relating to pokelaine machine ..... to repossess the vehicle in question in the eye of law and the act of repossession of the vehicle is itself a criminal act. in support of his argument, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 has referred to the judgment passed in citicorp. maruti finance ltd. v. s. vijayalaxmi reported in (2012 air scw251 6. it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... in conformity with the principles of natural justice. petitioner should have availed the remedy of revision, if aggrieved, before the central government mining tribunal in terms of section 30 of mmdr act 1957 instead of invoking jurisdiction of this court. the respondent sought leave of this court through i.a no. 8181 of 2016 to file additional documents which ..... in form-k of the mcr. a criminal prosecution was initiated against him being potka p.s. case no. 28 of 2003 under sections 379/411 of indian penal code and section 4/21 of the mmdr act by the respondents. it was however quashed by this court in w.p. (cr.) no. 150 of 2006 vide order dated 04 ..... important terms and conditions of the lease and never bothered to remedy the same despite several notices such as letters dated 12th june, 2003; 19th june, 2003; 31st october, 2007; 29th september, 2009 and several such letters such as dated 21 st december, 2013, marked as annexure- a series. it has also been stated that petitioner did not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... consumer affairs, government of jharkhand, ranchi 2. the chief secretary, government of jharkhand, ranchi 3. secretary, department of law (justice), government of jharkhand, ranchi 4. secretary, finance department, government of jharkhand, ranchi 5. jharkhand state consumer disputes redressal commission, doranda, ranchi through its president ... ... ... respondents ------ coram: hon'ble mr. justice d. ..... counsel for the petitioner has tendered this court copy of the judgment and order delivered by hon'ble supreme court in civil appeal no.2740 of 2007 with w.p.(c) no.164 of 2002, as well as the copy of letter written by the district & sessions judge (retired) - senior ..... academy and arrangements for the same be worked out in consultation with high court, within three months.13. consumer awareness programmes under the consumer protection act be conducted continuously / regularly under the aegis of or in association with state legal services authority. you are required by the committee to submit .....
Tag this Judgment!