Court : Jharkhand
..... has been filed. learned counsel for the respondents vehemently opposes the contention of the learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that the finance department has issued resolution dated 18.12.2007 making it necessary that those services which do not have their service rules or there is no hierarchy of posts in the service ..... date in the case of any person deemed to have been allocated to the state of bihar or to the state of jharkhand under section 72 of the bihar reorganization act, 2000, shall not be varied to his disadvantage except with the previous approval of the central govt. it is the further case of ..... these writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners for redressal of their grievances.5. learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the concerned respondent- authorities have acted arbitrarily and malafidely in downgrading the pay-scales of the petitioners, without giving any opportunity of hearing regarding the intention of the government to downgrade the pay .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... on1212.2017 pronounced on1812.2017 the petitioner is an accused for allegedly committing an offence punishable under sections 120b, 511 of the indian penal code, sections 7, 12 and 13(2) read with section 13(1)(d) and 15 of the prevention of corruption act, 1988.2. the allegations in the first information report is that one tapas kumar dutta, principal ..... name and style of (i) m/s. high rank commodities dealer pvt. ltd., (ii) m/s. rexnos trexim pvt. ltd., and (iii) m/s. g.r.d. finance pvt. ltd., this petitioner issued notices to the said assessees and concluded the reassessment proceedings. it is alleged that the petitioner being the income tax officer, abused his official position ..... in relation to (i) m/s. high rank commodities dealer pvt. ltd., (ii) m/s. rexnos trexim pvt. ltd., and (iii) m/s. g.r.d. finance pvt. ltd., it would be quite clear that the investigating agency has found that this petitioner, on the directions of the principal accused tapas kumar dutta, issued notices of hearing .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the pay of the applicant was fixed under instructions contained in office memorandum dated 24th november, 2008 and the date of effect was mentioned as 12th december, 2007, there was no illegality calling for interference in the impugned action of the respondent authorities. the applicant had neither moved an application during his service career ..... was declined by the impugned letter (annexure-9) issued by the respondents by stating that office order issued by the government of india, ministry of finance, department of expenditure, implementation cell dated 24.11.2008 and corrigendum dated 27.11.2008 is not applicable for the financial upgradation in the cadre ..... considered from another perspective, petitioner enjoyed the superannuation benefit as per his pay fixation since his retirement on 30 th november, 2008 and got into the act in the year 2013 only when his representation dated 18th february, 2013 was rejected by the respondents vide letter dated 18th march, 2013. learned tribunal also .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... the pay of the applicant was fixed under instructions contained in office memorandum dated 24th november, 2008 and the date of effect was mentioned as 12th december, 2007, there was no illegality calling for interference in the impugned action of the respondent authorities. the applicant had neither moved an application during his service career ..... was declined by the impugned letter (annexure-9) issued by the respondents by stating that office order issued by the government of india, ministry of finance, department of expenditure, implementation cell dated 24.11.2008 and corrigendum dated 27.11.2008 is not applicable for the financial upgradation in the cadre ..... considered from another perspective, petitioner enjoyed the superannuation benefit as per his pay fixation since his retirement on 30 th november, 2008 and got into the act in the year 2013 only when his representation dated 18th february, 2013 was rejected by the respondents vide letter dated 18th march, 2013. learned tribunal also .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... in sealed envelopes which are sent to tender opening committee, consisting of officers each from purchase and finance department.39. that after opening the tenders the said committee passed it on to tender section in purchase department. purchase department makes the comparative statement of the prices quoted by the committee along ..... purchase committee (spc). the spc after reviewing the recommendation of prc forwards its recommendation to director, finance for concurrence, director, finance after concurrence forwards the same to cmd for according approval. he had to act upon the recommendations of the technical 16 committee. 59. that it is stated that it has wrongly ..... the petitioner was posted as chief superintendent (mechanical), narwapahar mine in uranium corporation of india ltd. 76. the petitioner had very limited scope to act individually, rather he was the engineer in charge of narwapahar mine. he along with the engineers in charge 22 of the other mines forwarded the recommendation .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... action of the respondents- state is highly discriminatory in putting the petition into detrimental position, which is contrary to the provisions of section 73 of bihar re-organization act, 2000. to buttress his argument, learned counsel for the petitioner heavily relied 5 on the judgment passed in case of t. ..... the chief secretary, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi.2. the principal secretary, science and technology department, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi.3. the secretary-cum-commissioner, department of finance, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi.4. the director, science & technology, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi. ... respondents. =============================================================== for petitioner : mr. saurabh shekhar, advocate mr. ..... the petitioner was not considered in light of the order passed by the hon ble courts, the petitioner made representation on 21.06.2007 for consideration of his case as the similarly situated co-employee pravin kumar singh had been considered and absorbed on the post of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... and guarantors which were as under; primary security first charge by way of mortgage land building of factory alongwith hypothecation charge over plant & machinery purchased out of bank finance. apart from above primary security, the following collateral securities were also mortgaged with the bank; (a) sale deed no. 11626 dated 30.07.2002 in the name ..... the loan proposal was marketed by shri murari prasad baranwal and his team. the proposal was for taking over of existing loan from allahabad bank. hazarbagh with increased finance by way of r esh term loan and increased cash credit limit. the proposal consists as under: (a) takeover of existing term loan of rs. 200 lacs ..... been submitted that police after completion of investigation submitted charge sheet under sections 120b, 420, 467, 468, 471 of the i.p.c and under section 12 & 13 (2) r/w section 13(1)(d) of the p.c act and cognizance has been taken under the same sections, trial will take some time. so, considering all these facts, the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... for the default, the same has to be considered in its proper perspective and a conscious decision has to be taken as to whether action under section 29 of the act is called for. thereafter, the modalities for disposal of the seized unit have to be worked out. (viii) fairness cannot be a one-way ..... ) 4. the branch manager, bihar state financial corporation, deoghar branch, deoghar 5. the managing director, santhal pargana industrial area development authority, dumka 6. m/s surana properties & finance (p) ltd., through its detector, mrs. archana atish .. respondents ----- coram hon ble mr. justice rajesh shankar ----- for the petitioner mr. mahesh kumar sinha for the respondent nos ..... be said to be unfair or unreasonable. the action against the petitioner was initiated by the respondent-corporation by taking recourse to sections 29 and 30 of the b.s.f.c act, which has been clearly averred in paragraph 6 of the counter affidavit. the said statement made by the respondent-corporation has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... treating the said college as an affiliated college till the agreement is executed between the college and the university in terms of section 4(14) of the act after which it becomes a constituent college. in the circumstances of the case, there shall be no order as to costs ..... established by minority community in the year 1968 and was affiliated to bhagalpur university. on 13.11.1985, a communication was forwarded by finance officer, bhagalpur university to stop the financial operation as it is being made a constituent college. upon receiving such communication, the college moved ..... development department, govt. of jharkhand, ranchi.4. sido kanhu murmu university, dumka through its vice-chancellor.5. the registrar, sido kanhu murmu university, dumka.6. the finance officer, sido kahnu murmu university, dumka. ... respondents. =============================================================== for petitioner : mr. ranjan kumar singh, advocate for respondent-state : mr. prem pujari roy, advocate for .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Jharkhand
..... to para 18 of the judgment passed by hon'ble apex court in the case of union of india and others vs. s. vinodh kumar and others reported in (2007) 8 scc100 which is reproduced as under: 18. it is also well settled that those candidates concerned who had taken part in the selection process knowing fully well ..... in the high court of jharkhand at ranchi w.p.(s)no.5685 of 2017 -------- prakash bhushan. ...petitioner -versus- 1. the state of jharkhand through principal secretary, finance department, govt. of india of jharkhand, p.o. dhurwa, p.s. jagannatpur.2. the principal secretary, forest & environment department, nepal house, doranda, ranchi p.o.-dhurwa p.s. ..... also gone to the office to know the reasons for his elimination but the respondents did not disclose any reason to him. the petitioner sought information under right to information act but till now no information is given to him. hence, this writ petition has been filed.2.4. mr. anuj burman, learned counsel strenuously urges that the .....
Tag this Judgment!