Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2005 section 2 income tax Court: rajasthan Page 98 of about 8,155 results (0.144 seconds)

Mahavir Prasad Pancholi Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1975)ILLJ140Raj

..... to the director or not and as to how he was dealing with such matters. since no light could be thrown i have to presume the regularity of the official act of the director for the purposes of this case. this order of the director does not leave any doubt in my mind that the petitioner was a revenue officer on ..... director was dealing with the matter, but the powers of the state government could be delegated to the director of local bodies under the rajasthan town municipalities act, 1951 or under the rajasthan municipalities act. 1959 for that matter. neither learned counsel for the petitioner, nor the learned additional government advocate have been able to clarify this position whether powers in this .....

Sobhagmal Vs. Ram Gopal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1969WLN51

..... falling within the definition given in section 4 of the negotiable instruments act prima facie intend to create a negotiable instrument and unless there are facts and circumstances negativing such an intention it must be held to be a promissory note ..... document was to obtain an acknowledgement in writing of the two loans advanced to the defendant. the writing fulfils all the requirements of the promissory note given in section 4 of the negotiable instruments act. it was held in smt. bhanwar bai v. ghanshyam dass s.b. civil revision no. 251/1964 decided on 7-12-65 that parties creating a document .....

Nayab Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2007(3)Raj2077

..... be a case of intentionally causing bodily injury, which can be categorized under clause 2 and 3 of section 300 ipc, nor from this evidence, it can be gathered that it was a case of knowledge where a single act of axe blow can be termed as so imminently dangerous which in all probability will cause death so as ..... rajasthan reported in 2005(3) rdd (raj.) 205; nahar singh and anr. v. state of rajasthan reported in 2006(5) rdd (raj.) 2897; state of orissa v ..... ii ipc, which deals with culpable homicide not amounting to murder or section 326 ipc. in support of his contention, learned counsel has placed reliance on several judgments i.e. dharam and ors. v. state of haryana reported in : 2007crilj791 ; rakesh @ rakesh kumar v. state of rajasthan reported in 2005(9) rdd (raj.) 3925; mahipal @ pappu v. state of .....

H.S. Chauhan and ors. Vs. Life Insurance Corporation of India and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1982WLN321

..... the scales of remuneration and other terms and conditions of services applicable to the employees whose services stood statutorily transferred to the corporation under sub-section (1) of section 11 of the act. it was urged that the impugned order does not purport to bring any uniformity in the scales or remuneration and other terms and conditions. ..... to any industrial law that is binding on the employees or the government today.it was my feeling and i am quite sure by now that the finance minister has not properly gone through this particular drafting or he has not realised the repercussions of these particular lines. i am quite sure, when he ..... the impugned notifications can be held to be invalid being in contravention of the earlier agreements and settlements and the provisions of the industrial disputes act.36. section 2(s) of the industrial disputes act reads as under:(s) 'workman' means any person (including an apprentice) employed in any industry to do any skilled on unskilled -manual, .....

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Neha Proteins Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2008)217CTR(Raj)180; [2008]306ITR102(Raj)

..... in challapalli sugar ltd. (supra), and held that the amount would be chargeable to tax, and such income has to be computed in accordance with the provisions of the it act, section 14 whereof lays down that for the purpose of computation, income of an assessee has to be classified under the six heads, and then it was found, that such ..... net loss of rs, 29,360. however, then the company filed a revised return, showing business loss of rs. 3,21,802, and claimed that the interest and finance charges along with other pre-production expenses are required to be capitalized, and therefore, the interest income of rs. 2,92,440 should reduce the pre-production expenses, which ..... the judgment of the hon'ble supreme court, in cit v. bokaro steel ltd. : [1999]236itr315(sc) .2. the appeal was admitted vide order dt. 10th aug., 2005, by framing the following substantial question of law:whether in the facts and circumstances of the case, the tribunal was right in law in holding that interest earned by the .....

Basheera and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1988WLN(UC)116

..... imprisonment by the additional sessions judge, kishangarh bas by his judgment dated february 20, 1986. by the same judgment, accused basheera was further convicted under section 3/25 of the arms act and sentenced to 6 month's rigorous imprisonment with a fine of rs. 100/-, in default of the payment of fine to further undergo 1 ..... the result, we allow the appeal of accused basheera, noora and goonga. the conviction of accused basheera under section 302, ipc and under section 3/25 of the arms act and the conviction of accused noora and goonga under section 302/34 ipc and the sentences awarded to them are set aside. they are acquitted of the offences they ..... case for trial to the court of sessions. the learned additional sessions judge, kishangarh bas framed the charges under section 302/34 ipc against accused goonga and noora and under section 302 ipc and 3/25 of the arms act against the accused basheera. the accused pleaded not guilty and faced trial. according to them they have been falsely .....

Suresh Kumar Vs. Dungarpur-banswara Kshetriya GramIn Bank

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLN226

rajesh balia, j.1. according to the petitioner, the respondent-dungarpur-banswara-kshetriya gramin bank, dungarpur is a creature of regional rural banks act, 1976. it is financed by national bank of agriculture and rural development (for short, ' nabard') and is sponsored by the bank of baroda, which is a nationalised bank. the respondent bank issued an advertisement .....

Takshila Hospital Ltd. and Kishan Singh Deora Vs. Dr. Jagmohan Mathur

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : [2003]115CompCas343(Raj); 2002(4)WLC609; 2003(2)WLN250

..... unaffected.31. as a result, these appeals are allowed. as the petitioner has in pursuance of the option given by the learned company judge preferred applications under section 397 of the act, as a remedy more appropriate to proceed with in the first instance, the winding up petition is dismissed subject to the observations made above. the company ..... the winding up petition notwithstanding his prima facie conclusion it was desirable to see that if the petitioners choose to go before the company law board under section 397 of the act, the matter must be examined there in the first instance and thereafter parties may have resort to their remedies against that order. the right of the ..... ), kapil n. mehta v. shree laxmi motors ltd. [2001] 103 comp cas 498 (guj); [1999] 2 comp lj 267 and kiritbhai r. patel v. lavina construction and finance pvt. ltd. [2000] 99 comp cas 75 (guj); [1999] 3 comp lj 123.20. in this connection, learned counsel for the petitioner invited our attention to two decisions in .....

Commercial Taxes Officer, AlwA. Vs. M/S J L C Electroment Pvt. Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan Jaipur

..... that no requirement of furnishing declaration in form st-18a could be fastened upon the respondent-assessee in the present case, the penalty in question under section 78 (5) of the act deserves to be set aside and the appellate authority below has rightly done so, and therefore, their orders would not require any interference by this court ..... of the aforesaid notification providing for requirement to furnish such declaration in form no. st-18a besides the sale bills and goods transportation receipt as per section 78 (2) of the act as they were not electrical goods but the same were goods used for distribution of electricity or any other form of power and, thus, as ..... tax board dated 29.11.2005 dismissing its appeal against the order of deputy commissioner (appeals) dated 26.10.2004.2. both the appellate authorities thus in favour of respondent-assessee held that penalty of rs.56,790/- could not be imposed on the respondent-assessee under section 78 (5) of the rst act, 1994 on account of .....

Kailash Bhansali (Smt.) Vs. Surendra Kumar

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 2000(3)WLN387

..... at annex. 1 and 2 passed by the family court, udaipur, only with a view to harass the petitioner, the respondent husband filed an application under sec. 13 (i) (a) (ii) of the hindu marriage act before the family court, udaipur stating that his wife failed to comply with the decree passed by the family court regarding restitution of conjugal right, therefore ..... wife-present petitioner, which was dismissed on 30.3.95 by the then judge of family court. thereafter, the petitioner wife filed application u/s: 9 of the hindu marriage act for restitution of conjugal right against her husband before the family court, udaipur which was allowed on 26.10.1996 by the then judge of family court (annex.2). instead .....