Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 2005 section 2 income tax Court: rajasthan Page 94 of about 8,155 results (1.481 seconds)

Oct 20 2004 (HC)

Ashwani Chobisa Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2005(1)Raj389

..... 3) the district collectors of gurgaon in haryana and alwar in rajasthan shall be authorized by the respective state governments to take necessary action under section 5 of the said act in respect of cases where the project proponents fail to implement to the conditions. the state government is also required to initiate steps to prepare ..... to what will be mind, how it will be mined and with what method, how the financing will be arranged, what are the areas of environmental concerns (keeping in view the regional character) which need to be addressed by the entrepreneur. this does ..... management plan.in large-scale mining projects, the applicant is asked to submit detailed mine plans on mining and processing methods, the technology being used, the financing plan and the environmental management plan (including reclamation) and the training and local benefits envisaged but what it still require is a proposal on district level as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 2008 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Kansara Modler Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2008)218CTR(Raj)21

..... cat : [1975]98itr167(sc) , and held, that the amount would be chargeable to tax, and such income has to be computed in accordance with the provisions of the it act, section 14 whereof lays down, that for the purpose of computation, income of an assessee has to be classified under the six heads, and then it was found, that such income ..... net loss of rs. 29,360. however, then the company filed a revised return, showing business loss of rs. 3,21,802, and claimed, that the interest and finance charges along with other pre-production expenses are required to be capitalized, and therefore, the interest income of rs. 2,92,440 should reduce the pre-production expenses, which ..... to be as capital receipt, and not income of the assessee from any independent source.2. the appeal was admitted by this court, vide order dt. 23rd aug., 2005, by framing the following substantial questions of law:i. whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the learned tribunal was legally justified in holding .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 05 1992 (HC)

Om Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992(1)WLN88

..... 22 and it is independent of the consideration of the detenu's case and his representation by the advisory board under clause (4) of article 22 read with section 8(c) of the act. (see: s.k. abdul karim and ors. v. state of west bengal : 1969crilj1446 , pankaj kumar chakrabarty and ors. v. state of west bengal : [1970] ..... allowed. the detention order dated july 4, 1991 (annexure 1) and confirmation order dated october 22,1991 (annexure 4) passed by the government of india, ministry of finance, department of revenue, new delhi are quashed. the petitioner om singh will be released forthwith if not required in any other case. this shall, however, not effect petitioner ..... of detention dated july 4, 1991 (annexure 1) and confirmation order dated october 22, 1991 (annexure 4) passed by the government of india in the ministry of finance, department of revenue, new delhi and for directing the respondents to release the petitioner forthwith.2. in short, it has been averred in the writ petition that an .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 23 2005 (HC)

Baradiya Colony Vikas Samiti Vs. Ramchandra Kasliwal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj143; 2005(4)WLC776

..... are celebrated with great fervour and enthusiasm attract number of persons. festivals in connection with dusshera and diwali are thus a matter of common interest to a very large section of the populous in the country. these festivals and celebrations connected with the same cannot be stopped.7. the question that however, arises is as to whether ..... deciding the writ petition aforesaid gave several directions which are being reproduced below: 1. ramniwas garden shall be kept as a park within the meaning of the act of 1956 and no to pass through it with the exception that such narrow lines may be made for bringing certain vehicles inside for the purpose of catering to ..... have financed to repair the damages, if any done. case of students' union, in our view, stands on entirely different footing than that of the department of government itself. whereas we find that the applicant should be granted permission to hold functions in the ram niwas garden and albert hall from 8.10.2005 to 5.11.2005 in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 25 2007 (HC)

Fateh Lal Vs. Bhagwati Lal

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2008(2)Raj1022

..... be dismissed with costs.9. i have considered the rival submissions of the parties and have also perused the record.10. as per provisions of section 34 of the evidence act, the entires in the books of account regularly kept in course of business, are relevant whenever they are referred to a matter into which the court ..... him on credit. in this regard, the learned counsel relied upon a bench decision of andhra pradesh high court in the matter of vasireddi seetharamaiah v. srirama motor finance corporation, kakinada and anr. : air1977ap164 . the learned counsel contended that the bills and the accounts produced by the defendant which do not bear the signature of ..... books of account would not be sufficient to charge any person with the liability and there should be evidence on record to corroborate the entries. but, then section 34 does not require any particular form of corroborative evidence. the corroborative evidence may be oral or documentary. even the plaintiff's own testimony on oath in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 21 2009 (HC)

Gheeshi Bai (Smt.) and anr. Vs. Mangi Bai (Smt.) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2010(1)Raj382

..... court reported in : air 1972 sc 1520, dr. govind das and anr. v. smt. shanti bai : air 2001 sc 1658, r.k. mohammed abidullah v. ag abdul wahim and air 2005 sc 1320. while citing these judgments, it is submitted by learned counsel for the appellant that the reasons for denial of basic relief is totally illegal and once it is ..... that on the date of judgment 19 years limitation has expired irrespective of the fact that they have filed the suit will within the limitation as contemplated under indian limitation act with promptitude?10. for deciding the above issue and cross-objection, it. is worthwhile to consider the important aspect of the matter that appellant himself has made alternative prayer in ..... gopal krishan vyas, j.1. in this second appeal filed under section 100, c.p.c., the appellants are challenging the judgment and decree dated 21.04.1992 passed by the addl. district judge no. l, udaipur in civil appeal no. 43/ .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 16 2001 (HC)

Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Lal Bahadur Shastri Education Society

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (2001)167CTR(Raj)307

..... an educational institution in the years under consideration solely for educational purposes and not for any profit-earning purpose and, therefore, it is entitled to exemption under section 10(22) of the act.' sec. 10(22) reads as under : 'clause (22) : any income of a university or other educational institution, existing solely for educational purposes and not ..... purpose not for the purpose of profit and two appeals for the assessment years 1985-86 and 1987-88 arising out of penalty appeals under section 221(1) of the act.'1. whether, on facts and in the circumstances of the case and hon'ble tribunal was legally correct in holding that the income of ..... since the establishment of society, the society has installed as many as six educational institutions, took into consideration the modus operandi of its dealing with the finances inter se between the schools and society. it also found that engaging the students of the institution in the activity of manufacturing furniture was relevant and the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 11 2003 (HC)

Smt. Gulab Kanwar Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(2)Raj1217; 2003(2)WLC19

..... which the state government may in its discretion decide to have been done or to have taken place, on grounds connected with political movement or as a result of any act or offence related to or arising from or during the course of any action taken the suppression of such movement under the orders or at the instigation of with the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 22 1982 (HC)

Sita Ram and Etc. Etc. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1982Raj256; 1982()WLN234

..... that the authorised officer along with his servants and workmen shall enter his premises for performing the functions of survey etc. mentioned in sub-section (1) of section 4, of the act. the state government in case of large chunk of land may he satisfied about its .suitability for acquisition without any survey of the land ..... the state to remove the defect, if possible, by evidence to show 'hat some exceptional circumstances which necessitated the elimination of an inquiry under section 5a of the act and that the mind of the commissioner was applied to this essential question. in these circumstances, their lordships held that the correct way of putting ..... of fact and as such thewrit petitions deserve to be dismissed on this ground alone. it was also pleadedthat in answer to the notice under section 9 of the act, the petitioners have claimed compensation for acquisition of land, construction, standing crop etc., and as such theywere estopped from challenging the acquisition proceedings now .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 22 1963 (HC)

Badri Prasad Vs. Satish Kumar Sharma

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1964Raj184

..... kumar the successful candidate to the rajasthan legislative assembly, from bansur constituency is void for corrupt practices under section 123(4) of the act.65. the substance of the decision may be intimated to the election commission and the speaker of the rajasthan legislative assembly. an authenticated ..... the petitioner.63. from the conclusion reached above, itfollows that the election of the respondent is liable to be declared void under section 101(b) read with section 123(4) of the act.64. i, therefore, accept the appeal, set aside the order of the tribunal and declare that the election of respondent satish ..... rspondent satish kumar shama was declared duly elected from the aforesaid assembly constituency by the returning officer. the petitioner badri prasad submitted an application under section 80 of the act to the election commissioner of new delhi, challenging the validity of the election of the respondent. in his petition, he had taken a .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //