Skip to content


Finance Act 1992 Section 76 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1992 section 76 Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 587 results (0.395 seconds)
Aug 25 2006 (TRI)

A.A. Salam Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Wealth

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin

Decided on: Aug-25-2006

Reported in: (2007)106TTJ(Coch.)1140

particular provision on the statute book the relevance of the finance minister s speech for the purpose of finding out the save specifically exempted under section 2 e by the finance act 1992 section 2 ea was brought on the statute book specifically exempted under section 2 e by the finance act 1992 section 2 ea was brought on the statute book giving any part of the land as a vacant land under section 2 ea of the act the cwt a therefore directed

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 14 2006 (SC)

North West Switchgear Limited Vs. Commnr. of Central Excise, New Delhi

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-14-2006

Reported in: 2006(2)BomCR545; 2006(195)ELT134(SC); JT2006(2)SC405; 2006(2)SCALE338; (2006)3SCC86; [2006]145STC169(SC)

sub heading 8414 99 of the schedule to the tariff act there is a separate sub heading of parts and accessories the authority in original in exercise of its powers under section 35e 2 and directed that an appeal be preferred accordingly

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 19 2006 (HC)

Kripa Shankar @ Kripa Shanker Prasad and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar a ...

Court: Patna

Decided on: Apr-19-2006

the parties section 20 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 provides as under 20 cognizance and trial of offences dishonest inducement to invoke applicability of cheating by personation under section 420 ipc mdash public analyst report was essential to make ors v state of bihar reported in 1990 1 blj 761 and submitted that in absence of compliance of the mandatory

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 03 2006 (HC)

Krishnappa S/O Govindegowda, Vs. C.V. Veena W/O Shivanna K. and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-03-2006

Reported in: ILR2006KAR3882; 2006(6)KarLJ9

to accept the same under section 29 b of the act thereafter they submitted the resignation letters on 19 3 2005 of the society nor an official of the state government section 29 b of die act deals with resignation of members

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 2006 (HC)

Microsoft Corporation Vs. Deepak Raval

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Jun-16-2006

Reported in: LC2007(1)72

be liable to pay punitive damages also which may spell financial disaster for them in mathias v accor economy lodging inc can be inferred from inter alia nature of the infringing act reasonable knowledge of a person skilled in the concerned trade supra the australian court having regard to the provisions of section 116 4 of the copyright act which provides that where

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 22 2006 (SC)

C.T. Cotton Yarn Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-22-2006

Reported in: 2006(202)ELT385(SC); JT2006(12)SC199; 2006(9)SCALE463; (2006)7SCC794

the amendment applied only to the period subsequent to the finance act 1995 and not before it was also reiterated that waste section 3 1 of the central excise and tariff act 1985 ceta 1985 c h 52 02 appellant an export was entitled to the benefit of the extended period under section 11a of the act and confirmed the demand under notice

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2006 (TRI)

Surbhi Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs and

Court: Authority for Advance Rulings

Decided on: Dec-05-2006

Reported in: (2007)(208)ELT578AAR

cess ec 2 of aggregate of all duties levied under finance no 2 act 2004 notification no 56 2002 ce dated rates of tax for the purpose of encouraging an industrial activity a liberal construction should be put upon the language of central excise act 1944 1 of 1944 read with sub section 3 of section 3 of the additional duties of excise

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 17 2006 (HC)

All India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Feb-17-2006

Reported in: (2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14

was rectified by retrospective amendments made in section 68 of finance act 2003 giving effect for the period from 16 07 court was also rectified by subsequent amendment made in the act that the assumption and presumptions of the petitioners association regarding 2 d xii and xvii which are in conflict with section 65 and 66 that the defects pointed out by the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 27 2006 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Eicher Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Jan-27-2006

Reported in: (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)369

..... in this connection reliance was made on the amendment placed to section 80m by section 10 of the finance act 1968 the high court examined the contention with reference to the statement ..... case of modi rubber ltd in ita no 3270 del 1992 and the order in the case of steel authority of india ltd v ..... asstt cit 2001 70 ttj del tm 849 2001 76 itd 69 del tm reliance was also placed on the judgment of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 30 2006 (TRI)

Shilpa Color Lab Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Decided on: Oct-30-2006

Reported in: (2007)8STT102

the valuation of photography services section 65 zb of the finance act defines photography services as services rendered to a customer that while rendering photographic services the service provider does not actually sell the materials consumed further the latest circular dated 3 studio or agency in relation to photography in any manner section 68 78 and 79 of the finance act are reproduced

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //