Finance Act 1992 Section 76 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1992 section 76 Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 587 results (0.395 seconds)A.A. Salam Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Wealth
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Cochin
Decided on: Aug-25-2006
Reported in: (2007)106TTJ(Coch.)1140
particular provision on the statute book the relevance of the finance minister s speech for the purpose of finding out the save specifically exempted under section 2 e by the finance act 1992 section 2 ea was brought on the statute book specifically exempted under section 2 e by the finance act 1992 section 2 ea was brought on the statute book giving any part of the land as a vacant land under section 2 ea of the act the cwt a therefore directed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNorth West Switchgear Limited Vs. Commnr. of Central Excise, New Delhi
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Feb-14-2006
Reported in: 2006(2)BomCR545; 2006(195)ELT134(SC); JT2006(2)SC405; 2006(2)SCALE338; (2006)3SCC86; [2006]145STC169(SC)
sub heading 8414 99 of the schedule to the tariff act there is a separate sub heading of parts and accessories the authority in original in exercise of its powers under section 35e 2 and directed that an appeal be preferred accordingly
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKripa Shankar @ Kripa Shanker Prasad and anr. Vs. the State of Bihar a ...
Court: Patna
Decided on: Apr-19-2006
the parties section 20 of the prevention of food adulteration act 1954 provides as under 20 cognizance and trial of offences dishonest inducement to invoke applicability of cheating by personation under section 420 ipc mdash public analyst report was essential to make ors v state of bihar reported in 1990 1 blj 761 and submitted that in absence of compliance of the mandatory
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishnappa S/O Govindegowda, Vs. C.V. Veena W/O Shivanna K. and ors.
Court: Karnataka
Decided on: Jul-03-2006
Reported in: ILR2006KAR3882; 2006(6)KarLJ9
to accept the same under section 29 b of the act thereafter they submitted the resignation letters on 19 3 2005 of the society nor an official of the state government section 29 b of die act deals with resignation of members
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMicrosoft Corporation Vs. Deepak Raval
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-16-2006
Reported in: LC2007(1)72
be liable to pay punitive damages also which may spell financial disaster for them in mathias v accor economy lodging inc can be inferred from inter alia nature of the infringing act reasonable knowledge of a person skilled in the concerned trade supra the australian court having regard to the provisions of section 116 4 of the copyright act which provides that where
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.T. Cotton Yarn Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise, Indore
Court: Supreme Court of India
Decided on: Sep-22-2006
Reported in: 2006(202)ELT385(SC); JT2006(12)SC199; 2006(9)SCALE463; (2006)7SCC794
the amendment applied only to the period subsequent to the finance act 1995 and not before it was also reiterated that waste section 3 1 of the central excise and tariff act 1985 ceta 1985 c h 52 02 appellant an export was entitled to the benefit of the extended period under section 11a of the act and confirmed the demand under notice
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSurbhi Industries Vs. Commissioner of Customs and
Court: Authority for Advance Rulings
Decided on: Dec-05-2006
Reported in: (2007)(208)ELT578AAR
cess ec 2 of aggregate of all duties levied under finance no 2 act 2004 notification no 56 2002 ce dated rates of tax for the purpose of encouraging an industrial activity a liberal construction should be put upon the language of central excise act 1944 1 of 1944 read with sub section 3 of section 3 of the additional duties of excise
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAll India Tax Payers Welfare Association Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Feb-17-2006
Reported in: (2006)205CTR(Mad)360; 2006[4]STR14
was rectified by retrospective amendments made in section 68 of finance act 2003 giving effect for the period from 16 07 court was also rectified by subsequent amendment made in the act that the assumption and presumptions of the petitioners association regarding 2 d xii and xvii which are in conflict with section 65 and 66 that the defects pointed out by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAssistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Eicher Ltd.
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Jan-27-2006
Reported in: (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)369
..... in this connection reliance was made on the amendment placed to section 80m by section 10 of the finance act 1968 the high court examined the contention with reference to the statement ..... case of modi rubber ltd in ita no 3270 del 1992 and the order in the case of steel authority of india ltd v ..... asstt cit 2001 70 ttj del tm 849 2001 76 itd 69 del tm reliance was also placed on the judgment of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShilpa Color Lab Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Oct-30-2006
Reported in: (2007)8STT102
the valuation of photography services section 65 zb of the finance act defines photography services as services rendered to a customer that while rendering photographic services the service provider does not actually sell the materials consumed further the latest circular dated 3 studio or agency in relation to photography in any manner section 68 78 and 79 of the finance act are reproduced
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT