Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 section 2 income tax Court: uttaranchal Page 7 of about 167 results (0.131 seconds)

Amit Joseph Vs. Joint Director of Education and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2005)1UPLBEC1

..... inter college, dwarahat, district almora (hereinafter for short the college) is a minority educational institution aided by the state government. the u.p. intermediate education act, 1921 and rules framed thereunder are applicable to the said institution. the manager of the college invited applications for the post of lecturer in chemistry through advertisement in ..... that he has put objection on the pay bill of sri amit joseph as his appointment is allegedly against the provisions of the u.p. intermediate education act, 1921. in the supplementary counter affidavit filed on behalf of the district education officer, it is stated that disapproval has been intimated to the management vide ..... disapprove the appointment within a period of 30 days required under regulation 17(g) contained in chapter ii of rules framed under the u.p. intermediate education act, 1921, and the approval is deemed to have been given under said clause, as such the appointment of sri amit joseph on the post of lecturer .....

The Bazpur Cooperative Sugar Factory Ltd. Vs. State of Uttarakhand and ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... cane and making the sugar and is involved in profit making business as such the same is also exempted from the purview of r.t.i. act, as has been provided under section 8(1) (d & e), which provide for exemption for the disclosure of the information. 3. learned counsel for respondents 1 and 2 has ..... dealt with by the information commissioner, as to whether the petitioner is a public authority or not within the meaning of the act. public authority has been defined in section 2(h) of the r.t.i. act, which is reproduced as below- public authority means any authority or body or institution of self-government established or constituted- ( ..... ) non-government organization substantially financed, directly or indirectly by funds provided by the appropriate government. 5. further, right to information has been defined in section 2(j) of the r.t.i., which is also quoted below- right to information means the right to information accessible under this act which is held by or under the control .....

M/S. Noble Motors and Another Vs. Virendra Goel

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

b.c. kandpal, president: 1. this is an appeal under section 15 of the consumer protection act, 1986 against the order dated 06.06.2007 passed by the district forum, nainital in consumer complaint no. 61 of 2006, whereby the district forum has partly allowed the consumer ..... , are that the complainant is a timber merchant. on 19.10.2005, the complainant had purchased a chevrolet tavera car from the opposite party no. 1. the said car was financed by bank of baroda. the complainant had given a demand draft for sum of rs. 8,91,109/- dated 20.10.2005 towards cost of the vehicle to the opposite .....

Bhu Prakash and anr. Vs. District Judge and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC715

..... iind additional district judge, mirzapur and ors., 1983 (1) arc 427, this court has held as under:-'it is common place fact that invariable when an application under section 21 of act is allowed, the tenant has to quit and this involves discomfort but if this alone was not sufficient to non-suit the landlord, no application for release could ever ..... petitioners have filed this petition against the judgment and order dated 14.10.2004 passed by the district judge in rent control and appeal no. 9 of 2004 under section 22 of act no. 13 of 1972 thereby confirming the judgment/order passed by respondent no. 2 in prescribed authority case no. 10 of 1995 virendra swaroop gupta v. bhu ..... drawing inferences like a court of appeal.' 56. in the case of india pipe fitting co. v. fakruddin m.a. baker and anr. reported in 1978 a.i.r. (s.c.) page 45 : 1978 arc 224, the apex court has held as under:-'the limitation of the high court while exercising power under article 227 of the constitution is well settled .....

Vikram Prasad and ors. Vs. Vice Chancellor, G.B. Pant University of Ag ...

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2004(3)AWC2571(UHC)

..... has been contested. a preliminary objection raised in the counter-affidavit regarding the maintainability of the writ petition on the ground that under section 23 of u. p. (agriculture and technology) university act, 1958 an appeal is maintainable before the chancellor against the decision of board of the university. it is stated on behalf of the ..... a pay scale always requires approval from the government as the burden in the public exchequer is involved in the matter. no such approval appears from the finance department either of the state or that of the centre.7. learned counsel for the respondents argued that since the petitioners at the time of absorption have ..... the different pay scales were applicable. that is not the case here.9. lastly learned counsel for the respondents also drew my attention to section 23 of u. p. (agricultural and technology) act, 1958 and argued that the petitioners should have gone in appeal before the chancellor of the university and, as such, the writ petition .....

Krishi Utpadan Mandi Samiti Vs. Sahid Raza and Company

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2005(1)ARC86

..... , the respondent no. 1 is working in the shed and after the construction of the shops, the same will be allotted to all those applicants, who have applied for self-financing scheme. the observations are quoted below:-^^deh'ku fjiksvz i=koyh ij 27 x nkf[ky dh x;hgsa dks ns[kus ls li'v gksrk gs fd fuekz.k ..... order to give the facilities to the licencees of get the shops within the premises of the mandi samiti as will appear from the preamble of the act, the same is quoted below:-'an act to provide for the regulation of sale and purchase of agricultural produce and for the establishment, superintendence and control of markets therefore, in uttar pradesh'11. in .....

The Commissioner of Custom and Central Excise Vs. India Glycols Ltd.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2008(131)ECC51; 2008(157)LC51; 2008(230)ELT39(NULL)

..... moulds and dies, generating sets and weighbridges used in the factory of the manufacturer.'specified duty' means duty of excise or the additional duty under section 3 of the customs tariff act, 1975 (51 of 1975).(2) notwithstanding anything contained in sub-rule (1), no credit of the specified duty paid on capital goods shall be ..... ) to (viii) above;(x) refractories falling within chapter 69;(e) goods specified in the table in the notification of the government of india in the ministry of finance (department of revenue) no. 68/89customs, dated the 1st march, 1989, and used in the factory of manufacturer.7. learned counsel for the appellant contended that ..... before 16.03.1995 in rule 57q of the central excise rules, 1944. the same is reproduced, as under:57q - applicability:explanation - for the purposes of this section -(1) 'capital goods' means -(a) machines, machinery, plant, equipment, apparatus, tools or appliances used for producing or processing of any goods or for bringing about any .....

Anand Prakash Agarwal Vs. State of Uttarakhand and Another

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2012CrLJ279(NOC)

..... accused at the time of entering into mou whereupon it can be inferred that the accused had the intention to deceive the complainant right from the very beginning. in alpic finance ltd. vs. p. sadasivan (2001) 3 scc 513, the supreme court held :- the facts in the present case have to be appreciated in the light ..... so to do, commits "criminal breach of trust". [explanation [1] - a person, being an employer 3[of an establishment whether exempted under section 17 of the employees' provident funds and miscellaneous provisions act, 1952 (19 of 1952), or not] who deducts the employee's contribution from the wages payable to the employee for credit to a provident ..... the part of the appellant has been alleged by the respondent. no allegation has been made that he had an intention to cheat the respondent from the very inception. section 405 i.p.c. defines criminal breach of trust. the said provision is extracted hereunder :- whoever, being in any manner entrusted with property, or with any dominion .....

U.P. Awas Evam Vikas Parishad, Through Its Sampati Prabandh Adhikari a ...

Court : Uttaranchal State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Dehradun

..... , bhopal. in the present facts and circumstances of the case, it can not be said that the complainant is not entitled to the benefit of section 14 of the limitation act, 1963 and the district forum was perfectly justified in condoning the delay in filing the consumer complaint. 10. learned counsel for the parishad cited a ..... in prosecuting the earlier proceedings. in the present case, the complainant was bonafidely prosecuting the earlier proceedings and, as such, he is entitled to the benefit of section 14 of the limitation act, 1963. 13. this apart, the honble supreme court in the case of mrs.rubi (chandra) dutta vs. m/s united india insurance company limited; ..... facts of the case as mentioned in the consumer complaint, are that in the year 1989, the complainant applied for allotment of type i house under the self-financing scheme floated by u.p. awas evam vikas parishad (hereinafter referred to as parishad?) and deposited sum of rs.25,000/- towards registration fee. the estimated cost .....

Oriental Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Banu Begum and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : 2007ACJ476

..... z.u. siddique, the learned counsel for the claimant. to appreciate the contentions of the parties, it is relevant to quote the provisions of sub-section (1) of section 165 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 which read as under:165. claims tribunals.-(1) a state government may, by notification in the official gazette, constitute one or more motor accidents ..... parked on the roadside and the welding work was being done on the tanker and deceased had nothing to do with the vehicle and neither the owner nor the finance company could be held liable for the same. the division bench of madras high court held that the expression 'arising out of the use of motor vehicle' ..... as mentioned in section 165 of the motor vehicles act, 1988 enlarges the field of protection made available to the victims of an accident and is in consonance with the beneficial object underlying the enactment. the .....