Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 section 2 income tax Court: uttaranchal Page 11 of about 167 results (0.121 seconds)

Bhim Dutt Vs. Bimla Devi

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : II(2006)DMC687

..... . thereafter, in the year 1995, the respondent filed a petition under section 25 of hindu marriage act, 1955, for permanent alimony, claiming rs. 5,000 per month as maintenance from the appellant (divorced husband), which was registered as original suit no. 41 of 1995. it ..... per month as maintenance to her.2. brief facts of the case are that the appellant got married to the respondent according to hindu rites in the month of november, 1978. it appears that the respondent filed a divorce petition in the year 1989, against her husband (appellant), which was decreed ex parte and the marriage between the parties was dissolved .....

Sanjay Verma Vs. Haryana Roadways

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : II(2007)ACC182; 2008ACJ151

Rajeev Gupta, C.J.1. They are heard.2. This is claimant's appeal for enhancement of the compensation awarded by Motor Accident Claims Tribunal/Addl. District Judge, Udham Singh Nagar vide Award dated 12.6.2000 passed in Motor Accident Claim Petition No. 201 of 1999.3. Claimant Sanjay Kumar Verma claimed compensation of Rs. 53,00,000 (Rupees fifty-three lakh only) for the injuries suffered by him in the motor accident on 12.8.1998 when the bus bearing registration No. HR07 PA 0197, in which he was travelling, met with an accident due to rash and negligent driving of its driver and fell in a ditch resulting in multiple injuries to several bus passengers including the claimant. The claimant further pleaded that he used to earn Rs. 5,000 per month from his shop and, on account of the injuries suffered by him in the accident, the lower part of his body has become paralysed rendering him unfit to pursue his occupation.4. Respondent Haryana Roadways, while admitting the fact of the accident, ...

Uptron India Ltd. Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : (2004)IILLJ378UC

..... the unit or pendency of the scheme for rehabilitation. therefore, i am of the opinion that the proceeding for recovery of such wages is not covered by section 22 of the said act of 1985. relying on the principle laid down in the case of shri chamundi mopeds limited (supra), i find that in case of such proceeding no ..... that the bifr, vide its order dated august 19, 1994 had declared the petitioner a sick unit under the sick industrial companies (special provisions) act, 1985 with the meaning of section 3(1) of the act. the respondent no. 2 has filed a reply in which it has been stated that the petitioner/company has no right to challenge the ..... in the aforesaid circumstances, i hold that the recovery certificate, auction and removal of goods on the aforesaid ground do not became illegal. with respect to the contention regarding 1978 act, i hold that the present claim of workmen in respect of wages is not a disputed claim in view of the findings, herein arrived, as regards such wages. true .....

Sudesh Kumar Kapoor Vs. Anil Anand and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : II(2006)ACC546; 2007ACJ1130

..... written statement in which it is pleaded that no information of the accident was given by the owner of the vehicle to the answering respondent and, as such, provisions of section 158(6) of the motor vehicles act, 1988 were violated. it is also pleaded that the vehicle was being driven in violation of the provisions of the motor vehicles ..... act and as such national insurance co. ltd. is not liable to make the payment of any amount of compensation.4. on the basis of the pleadings of the parties, following ..... prafulla c. pant, j.1. this appeal, preferred under section 173 of the motor vehicles act, 1988, is directed against the judgment and award dated 19.5.1999 in motor accident claim case no. 55 of 1994, passed by learned m.a.c.t./second additional .....

Dharmawati Devi and ors. Vs. Gurbachan Singh and anr.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : II(2007)ACC109

..... vehicle but the said connection need not be direct and immediate. this construction of the expression 'arising out of the use of motor vehicle' in section 92a of the 1939 act enlarge the field of protection made available to the victims of an accident and is in consonance with the beneficial object underlying the enactment'.18. in ..... of the permanent disablement of any person is a fixed sum of seven thousand and five hundred rupees. sub-section (3) of section 92a of the act provides that in any claim for compensation under sub-section (1) of section 92a, the claimant shall not be required to plead and establish that the death or permanent disablement in respect ..... . the hon'ble apex court in case of gujarat state road transport corporation, ahmedabad v. ramanbhai prabhatbhai and anr. (supra), has laid down thus:section 92a of the act provides that where the death or permanent disablement of any person has resulted from an accident arising out of the use of a motor vehicle or motor vehicles .....

Vishvakarma Paper and Boards Ltd. Vs. the Commissioner of Central Exci ...

Court : Uttaranchal

..... the notification dated 2nd of april, 1994, issued by the government of bihar in exercise of power conferred by clause (b) of sub-section (3) of section 7 of the bihar finance act, 1981, the high court further came to the conclusion that the notification so far as it imposes a condition that the facility of sales ..... are being extracted hereunder:7. coming to the second question, namely the issuance of notification by the state government in exercise of power under section 7 of the bihar finance act, it is true that issuance of such notifications entitles the industrial units to avail of the incentives and benefits declared by the state government ..... conferred by sub-section (1) of section 5a of the central excise act, 1944 (1 of 1944), read with sub-section (3) of section 3 of the additional duties of excise (goods of special importance) act, 1957 (58 of 1957) and sub-section (3) of section 3 of the additional duties of excise (textiles and textile articles) act, 1978 (40 of 1978), the central .....

S.K. Srivastava and Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr52

..... with it. any incidental trenching would not amount to encroachment upon the field covered by parliament.'22. learned counsel for the petitioners have challenged sub-section (4) of section 12 only of uttaranchal act of 2003 on the ground that if the permit holder has plied a vehicle only for one day, he might have to pay the tax ..... for as many as 8 slabs. however, the state of uttaranchal has amended the earlier provisions and it has been provided in the 4th schedule under section 6 of the act that upto 4500 kms. quarterly distance amount of quarterly additional tax or every type of classified routes will be rs. 154.00 per seat for plain ..... mishra v. state u.p. 2000 alj 2627. sections 5 and 6 of the act clearly provide that every motor vehicle falling within the purview of liability to tax under section 4 is liable to pay additional tax. in support of this contention, he placed implicit reliance on the decisions in sundaram finance ltd. v. regional transport officer manu/sc/0019/1992 .....

Amitabh Textile Mills Ltd. Vs. Official Liquidator and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : [2010]153CompCas715(Uttaranchal)

..... enabling the company to arrive at one-time settlements with the idbi and pnb. a compromise with the secured creditors, namely, idbi and pnb was proposed under section 391 of the companies act, 1956, which envisaged a compromise or arrangement between the company and its creditors or between the company and its members. on may 25, 2004, an ..... kumar gupta, sri omkar chand garg, sri dinesh jain and sri o.p. bhardwarj as co-directors so as to make efforts and take steps to provide necessary finances to assist the company to rehabilitate itself. but they did not bring in any need based capital funds for revival of the unit and some of them resigned ..... passed by the company judge of this court in misc. company application no. 11 of 2001, amitabh textiles mills ltd. v. board for industrial and financial reconstruction, finance ministry government of india, new delhi and anr.2. the relevant facts of the case are that the appellant amitabh textile mills ltd. (atml) is registered under the companies .....

Rai Bahadur Narayan Sugar Mills Ltd. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2007Utr36

..... . 1,16,800/-was paid.7. the petitioner was served with a notice from a.d.m. finance under section 47a of stamp act stating therein that the sale deed in question is undervalued and stamp duty paid is less. the a.d.m. finance, vide impugned order dated 25-11 -2005, observed that the petitioner company could use the land for ..... stamp duty as computed on the basis of the minimum value determined in accordance with the said rules and return the instrument for presenting again in accordance with section 23 of the registration act, 1908.15. a perusal of rules 340, 341 and 349 of the stamp rules provide the guidelines while deciding the question with regard to deficiency of ..... paragraphs 14 to 22 of the decision in the case of rai bahadur narayan sugar mills ltd. v. state of uttaranchal and ors. (supra) are quoted below:14. section 47a of the stamp act provides as under:47-a. under-valuation of instrument.- (1) (a) if the market value of any property, which is the subject of any instrument, on .....

Dinesh Chandra Jaiswal and Etc. Vs. State of Uttaranchal and ors.

Court : Uttaranchal

Reported in : AIR2004Utr19

..... have stated that their saw mill was installed before coming into force of aara mill rules. 1978, i.e., aara mill stahapana aur viniyaman niyamawali, 1978. however;, the amended rule has been produced by the standing counsel dated 26th june 1.998 where the definition of section 2 (a), which was amended, reads as under:'aara mill' ka taptarya imarati lakari aur anys ..... status quo of the last non-contested status which preceded the pending controversy until the final hearing when full relief may be granted or to compel the undoing of those acts that have been illegally done or the restoration of that which was wrongfully taken from the party complaining. but since the granting of such an injunction to a party who .....