Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 section 19 amendment of section 155 Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Page 4 of about 3,702 results (0.416 seconds)

Oct 08 2015 (HC)

Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., represented by its Chief Manager ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... precautions in storing them. the activity of applying these precautions may be called preservation of goods'. in the context of section 2(c) of the industrial finance corporation act, 1948 and section 16(2)(a) of salarjung museum act 1961, in ramanatha aiyar's advanced law lexicon, 3rd edition, the following meaning is ascribed to the word preservation ..... india) limited, were taken over and merged with hpcl by the government of india; and that hpcl is a government of india company under section 617 of the companies act, 1956. it was further averred that the petitioner and its predecessor, apart from certain other units in other parts of the country, has ..... ?: the act of keeping safe from injury, harm or destruction ?. another meaning explained by the same author to the word .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 05 2015 (HC)

A.V. Koti Reddy and Others Vs. The Union of India, rep.by its Secretar ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... or person, which is not for private use but for public use in public places, necessary permission has to be obtained from the competent authority. section 5 of the act empowers the government of india to make the rules to govern issuance of license for use of explosives. in exercise of said power, government of ..... to regulate various aspects involving policing duties. power to make rules includes regulation of issuance of license and regulation of blasting in terms of section 21 (f) (v) of the act. in exercise of said power, rules were formulated. a closure reading of the rules framed in exercise of said power would show that ..... according to learned standing counsel, hyderabad city police commissioner is competent to issue license and in valid exercise of power vested in him under section 21 of the hyderabad police act, license is granted. the respondent sewerage board through its contractor shall observe all the precautions before undertaking controlled blasting. this has been observed .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 01 2015 (HC)

Potlabathuni Srikanth and Others Vs. Shriram City Union Finance Limite ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... (2014 (6) alt 69 (db), lakhamraju sujatha v. yuvaraj finance private limited (2010 (1) ald 153 (db), and kvaerner cementation india limited v. bharat heavy plate and vessels limited (2001 (6) ald 272). 18. it is his submission that section 36 of the act provides for enforcement of an award shall be in the same manner ..... court of original jurisdiction means the district court inasmuch as the district judge is the presiding officer of that court. both the provisions (section 3(17) of general clauses act and section 2(4) of cpc) make it manifest that a district court in a district is the principal civil court of original jurisdiction. when ..... obvious that the learned senior civil judges courts of mangalagiri, peddapuram, gajuwaka and chittoor have no inherent jurisdiction to deal with the applications filed under section 36 of the act and consequently entertaining the eps by those courts is without authority and, therefore, the orders impugned are hereby set aside by giving liberty to respondent .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2015 (HC)

Prasad Sushee Joint Venture, Hyderabad Vs. The Singareni Colleries Com ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... shares of stock in the subsidiary company are held as assets on the books of the parent company and can be issued as collateral for additional debt financing. holding company and subsidiary company are, however, considered as separate legal entities, and subsidiary is allowed decentralized management. each subsidiary can reform its own ..... was submitted by the 3rd respondent, on behalf of the holding company, and the 2nd respondent was fully justified in taking into consideration the experience and finances of the holding company, while assessing and qualifying the 3rd respondent for evaluation of bids. 8. the counter affidavit further refers to the earlier tenders ..... mean a subsidiary company within the meaning of section 4 of the act, 1956. for the purpose of the act, 1956, a company shall be, subject to the provisions of sub-section (3) of section 4, of the act, 1956, deemed to be subsidiary of another. clause (1) of section 4 of the act, 1956 further imposes certain preconditions for a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 29 2015 (HC)

M/s. Goman Agro-Farms Private Ltd. and Others Vs. M/s. Nagavali Greenl ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... no.193 of 2015 is filed by m/s. hill county properties limited (transferee company). these company petitions have been filed under sections 391 and 394 of the companies act, 1956 (for short, the act') for sanction of the proposed scheme of amalgamation of transferor company nos.1 to 14 with the transferee company. 2. in company ..... 1964 by three trading companies and five banks; iii. abu dhabi investment authority a sovereign wealth fund owned by the government of emirate of abu dhabi; iv. housing development finance corporation limited (hdfc); v. central bank of india; vi. state bank of india (sbi) vii. uit asset management company pvt. ltd.; viii. india discovery fund limited; ..... name of the 14 transferor companies and that the investment in equity capital of land owning companies are concluded to be in violation of section 372a(1)(c) of the act and the inspection report has recommended prosecution of the company and its officer in default during the ommission of offence and the same is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2015 (HC)

Balavenkatagari Rama Muni Reddy Vs. K. Fakruddin

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... or as a provident fund in claiming for recovery under execution. though he is the best person to say from his personal knowledge exclusively including under section 106 of the evidence act, apart from it no plea; coming to the evidence if at all rw3 in saying the south central railway, guntakal paid his retirement benefits and ..... attachment. it is to say the provisions of the act speak such of the amount not liable to attachment. it is in fact clarified ..... to which the provident funds act, 1925 for the time being applied in sofar as they are derived by the said act ought to be liable to attachment. paragraph no.23 of the judgment says in jyothi chit fund and finance(supra), while dealing with provisions of sections 3 and 4 of the provident funds act, 1925 observed about prohibiting of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 16 2015 (HC)

The Commissioner of Central Excise and Customs, Hyderabad-II, Commissi ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of the tribunal and we may also notice the very question raised in the present case would become academic in view of the fact that section 11ac came to be substituted by finance act, 2011 with entirely new provisions where different rates of penalties have been prescribed. accordingly, these appeals are dismissed. as a sequel, miscellaneous petitions ..... removal of doubts, it is hereby declared that - (1) the provisions of this section shall also apply to cases in which the order determining the duty under sub-section (2) of section 11a relates to notices issued prior to the date on which the finance act, 2000 receives the assent of the president; (2) any amount paid to the ..... the order in original dated 26.03.2004 came to be passed and extended period of limitation was invoked. the duty penalty under section 11ac of the central excise act, 1944 (for short the act ?) and also under rule 173q apart from penalty under rule 209a of central excise rules, 1944 were determined and demanded from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2015 (HC)

M/s. Larsen and Toubro Ltd. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh rep. by its Pr ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... corpn. ltd., [(2002) 5 scc 203]; s.r. sarkar [supra]; 20th century finance corpn. ltd v. state of maharashtra [(2000) 6 scc 12]). section 4(2)(b) of the cst act is similar to section 23 of the sale of goods act.while section 4(2)(b) of the cst act deems sale of unascertained or future goods to take place within a state, at ..... documents of title during its movement, and not a sale of future goods. reliance is placed, on behalf of the petitioners, on state of tamil nadu v. bombay metal depot [(1978) 41 stc 140 (madras hc) (db)]; and state of karnataka v. ece industries ltd [(2006) 144 stc 605 (karnataka high court) (db)] wherein it was held that ..... it is speedier and cheaper than the other methods. (reg v. hillington, london borough council ((1974) 1 qb 720); gujarat ambuja cement ltd (supra); hanson v. church commissioner ((1978) 0 qb 823)).a writ of certiorari can be issued for correcting errors of jurisdiction such as in cases where orders are passed without jurisdiction, or is in excess of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 14 2015 (HC)

The Union of India, Rep. by the General Manager, S.C. Railway, Secunde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... subordinates and thereafter litigating, we disapprove of their anxiety in litigating. we are not unnecessarily upset that the railways have chosen to fritter away its precious finances by entering upon this kind of litigation. we are any way used to this kind of fruit-less litigation indulged in routinely by the railways. government ..... of briefing is required. certain information may have to be secured from various other sources independently. imagine the situation where the inquiry officer doing the above acts behind the back of the employee and thereafter the impression he gains beforehand about men and matters brought before him in the inquiry undertaken by him. ..... employee was so palpably and factually inaccurate, because the 1st respondent employee holds a valid driving licence issued by the competent authority under the motor vehicles act for driving a four-wheeler. it is therefore, a clear case where the explanation of the employee for staying away from duty unauthorizedly is a .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 2015 (HC)

Coromandel Mining and Exports Pvt. Ltd. and Others Vs. Union of India ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... that being a part of the basic structure of the constitution. it was submitted on behalf of the petitioners that by virtue of deletion of section 11 of the principal act by section 11 of the amendment act, sub-section (5), inserted by the state amendment, also stood omitted and thereby the protection to the scheduled areas has been taken away. it was ..... employeesunion v. union of india (2002) 2 scc 333)in paragraph-38 supreme court observed thus: 38. to the same effect are the observations of this court in peerless general finance and investment co. ltd. v. reserve bank of india [(1992) 2 scc 343] in which kasliwal, j. observed at p. 375 as follows: (scc para 31) 31. ..... such restrictions, certain tests have been devised through judicial decisions to test if article 14 has been violated or not. ? 19.1 in maneka gandhi v. union of india (1978) 1 scc 248)the supreme court after considering the opinion delivered in e.p.royappa v. state of t.n. (1974) 4 scc 3) in paragraph-7 observed thus: .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //