Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 section 19 amendment of section 155 Sorted by: recent Court: andhra pradesh Page 1 of about 3,702 results (0.736 seconds)

Feb 27 2017 (HC)

Chepuri Hanumantha Rao Vs. Chepuri Uma Bala

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... by the apex court in vanmala vs. h.m.ranganath bhatta (1995 (5) bomcr 851). 6. again from para 29 that section 25 of the hindu marriage act empowers the court exercising jurisdiction under the act, at the time of passing of the decree or at any time subsequent thereto, to direct the spouse that he shall pay maintenance ..... 000/- in march 2006 and rs.15,000/- in november 2006 by pressure tactics and send to her sisters and she depleted his physical health, mental peace and finance and deserted him in a sick, jobless and debt laden with dependency on his parents. she had worked as a teacher, principal and administrator in various schools in ..... aforesaid view, we are also encouraged by the following observations of this court in capt.ramesh chander kaushal vs. veena kaushal ((1978) 4 scc 70): the brooding presence of the constitutional empathy for the weaker sections like women and children must inform interpretation if it has to have social relevance. so viewed, it is possible to be selective .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 07 2017 (HC)

Cement Corporation of India Employees Union, Adilabad Cement Factory, ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... bench. it may also be noted that there is no challenge to the permission granted by the government of india, ministry of labour and employment under section 25(o) of the act by order dated 25/27.3.2008. this court is conscious of the scope of the interference under article 226 of the constitution of india, with respect ..... (irrigation) (1997(5) alt 696). it may not be out of place to refer to the caution expressed by the supreme court in the judgment referred in international finance corporation and another vs. bihar state industrial development corporation and others (2005) 10 scc 179)with regard to interference of the proceedings before the bifr though in different context ..... sell all the units and thereafter considering the various aspects had come to a conscious decision to resurrect and rehabilitate three units and as one of the means of financing had decided to sell the other units in the absence of valid reasons, cannot be found fault. this court can also take judicial note of the fact .....

Tag this Judgment!

Feb 03 2017 (HC)

Asmitha Microfin Limited (Asmitha)

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of providing financial and support services to marginalized sections of society particularly underserved rural and urban women across india. the erstwhile state of andhra pradesh passed andhra pradesh micro finance institutions (regulation of money lending) act, 2010 regulating the loan disbursement and recovery process for micro finance institutions in andhra pradesh and telangana. the ..... as under: (page 252): "the only question is, whether the agreement has been approved by the proper number of creditors required by the act. the second section of the act provided that the meeting of the company's creditors may approve and sanction the agreement: 'if a majority in number representing three- fourths ..... they represented three-fourths value of the creditors present and voting. the high court held that the three-fourths majority required under sub-section (2) of section 391 of the act was of the value represented by the members who were not only present but who had also voted. in fact, it went .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 2017 (HC)

Dhruv Medical Centre, A Partnership Firm Vs. Vijay Shanker Patel and A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... in dr. v. rajeshwar rao vs. m. yadagiri reddy and others (2007 (2) ald 17 (db) it is in relation to a.p. land grabbing prohibition act, section 8 on competency of special courts to direct transfer of suit pending in civil court for adjudication in holding although special court have all the trappings of a regular civil ..... as principal court of original jurisdiction. 15. from this even the expression in managing director, sundaram finance limited, madras and another vs. g.s. nandakumar (2001 (4) ald 660) referred under sections 8 and 9 read with section 2(1)(e) of the act 1996 what all says is only the district court that is competent to pass the interim orders ..... to another district judge of the district court. in pottabathuni srikanth vs sreeram city union finance limited (2015 (6) ald 629 (db), it was held in relation to execution of arbitration award as per section 36 r/w section 2 (i) (e) of the act, that execution application must be filed in principal civil court. it did not say as .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2017 (HC)

Karem Sivajee Vs. J.Prasad Babu and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... to requisition such information, document and such assistance as may be required from any department of the government for the effective implementation of the provisions of the act. section 12 stipulates the functions the commission is required to perform and, among them, are (a) inquire into complaints of (i) violation of any rights provided ..... to conclusions of certain definiteness. (barium chemicals ltd. (supra). in the formation of opinion regard must be had to the factors enumerated in that particular section of the act, together with all other factors relevant for the exercise of that power. there must exist circumstances which, in the opinion of the competent authority, suggest ..... to the post of chairman as per the sweet will and pleasure of the political executive; in the context of the responsibilities conferred, under section 12 of the 2003 act, on the chairman and members of the commission, parameters such as integrity of the candidate, and his record of service to the scheduled .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 03 2017 (HC)

Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited Vs. M/s. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... the amount claimed by the company petitioner. it asserted that there were seriously disputed questions of fact involved in the case and therefore, summary proceedings under section 434 of the act of 1956 could not be resorted to. reliance was placed upon the arbitration clause in clause 73 of the agreement to contend that the said dispute ..... time. he would further contend that, this being the situation, the company petitioner could have sued for damages for the delay in such payment and that section 434 of the act of 1956 was not the remedy. he would also point out that no remedial measures were taken recourse to by the company petitioner and would point ..... this project was sidelined by the successor chief minister. various alternative measures seem to have been contemplated so as to do away with the government s responsibility in financing this project or dropping it altogether. the chief minister seems to have had a meeting in this regard in april, 2010, but it was found that there .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 10 2016 (HC)

B. Hima Bindu Vs. Commissioner, Customs, CE and Service Tax

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... is useful to read these provisions in juxta-position with each other. section 129 of the customs act 1952 prior to substitution of chapter xv by the finance act, 1980section 129e of the customs act, 1952 after substitution of chapter xv by the finance act, 1980section 35f of the central excise act prior to its substitution by act 25 of 2014 with effect from 6.8.2014129 (1) where ..... circumscribed by the conditions in the grant. (vijay prakash d. mehta v. collector of customs (preventive) bombay (air 1988 sc 2010). section 129(1) of the customs act, 1952, prior to the substitution of chapter xv by the finance act, 1980, (similar to section 129-e of the customs act as applicable during the relevant period) related to making of deposit pending the appeal. though sub .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 04 2016 (HC)

M.P. Tej Babu Vs. The State of Telangana, Represented by its Principal ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... by the time the said case was decided by the punjab and haryana high court, the administration of union territory, chandigarh has not framed rules under section 22(2) of the act or under section 32(2)(f) thereof and consequently no action plan was envisaged. the division bench, while finding that the son of the appellants had absolutely no ..... noted that the division bench of the high court, in the justice shanti sarup dewan (supra), has not made detailed discussion on the contours of sub-section (2) of section 22 of the act. evidently, such a question was not put in issue before it, more so, in the absence of an action plan put in place for protection of ..... he has paid the sale consideration through cheques issued by him out of his own earnings. however, respondent no.3 maintained that as the petitioner was looking after the finances of the family, he has issued the cheques though the money belonged to herself. as noted supra, it is the further pleading of the petitioner that respondent no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2016 (HC)

Iragam Reddy Thirupal Reddy Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Represented b ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... observing that 1st petitioner, who is president/chairman of 4th respondent-society was a delegated member to the 5th respondent-society and was acting as chairman of 5th respondent- financing bank; as per proviso to section 21-a of the act, any delegate of a society sitting on a managing committee of any other society would cease to be such delegate if the committee ..... to the office of the sub-divisional co-operative officer, proddatur was appointed as person in-charge under section 32(7)(a)(i) read with rule 23-aaa (5) of the act; and therefore, one anjaneyulu, vice-chairman of 5th respondent-financing bank is appointed to act as chairman of 5th respondent-bank till elections are conducted to the post of chairman. this is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2016 (HC)

Jai Golden Emu Farms Rep. by its Proprietor Kishore Kumar Mane Vs. The ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

..... of securing the enforcement of the security interest of the secured creditor. that is the reason why a special provision is created in sub-section (1) of section 13 of the sarfaesi act by making it clear that the security interest created in favour of any secured creditor can be got enforced without the intervention of the ..... circumstances, all the farm owners have taken up the matter with the respective bankers, state bank of india and nabard, which takes care of the agricultural financing benefits. it is also represented before us that the matter has been taken up with the central government for providing some kind of assistance to enable the farm ..... debt due by them, resulting in getting into the very vitals of the secured creditors and more particularly financial institutions including those in the banking sector. under sub-section (2), the secured creditor, by delivering a notice, in writing, to any borrower whose liability remained unpaid, can call upon him to discharge in full such .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //