Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... that the complainant is residing at bangalore and no farm processing was going on. the complainant addressed letter dated 27.7.2011 to the chief manager, canara bank, hitech agricultural finance branch, bangalore stating that his poly-house was damaged during the months of june and july, 2011 and requested to intimate the same to the insurance company which shows that ..... ? to raise farm products in view of the land being the driest areas in the state of a.p. the complainant availed loan from canara bank, hi-tech agri finance bank and he had insured the entire green houses and machinery as per the terms and conditions of loan agreement. the complainant obtained standard fire and special perils policy bearing ..... by a common order. c.c.no.6 of 2013 is taken as lead case. 2. this is a complaint filed u/s 17(a)(i) of the consumer protection act for a direction to the opposite party to pay rs.98,43,000/- towards the claim of the complainant with interest and costs. 3. the case of the complainant in .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... to plead and prove that he was not gainfully employed during the period for which back wages were claimed having regard to the provisions of section 106 of the evidence act or the provisions analogous thereto. in a recent judgment of the hon'ble supreme court reported deepali gundu surwase versus kranti junior adhyapak mahavidyala ( ..... events which led to the filing of the petition. before the labour court, the petitioner was examined as ww1 and on behalf of the respondent, its finance manager was examined as mw1 and the petitioner marked exs.w1 to w3 while the respondent marked exs.m1 to m9. before the labour court, the ..... petitioner inudstrial tribunal-ii, chandravihar, m.j.road, hyderabad and another.respondents counsel for the petitioner: sr.s. ravindranath counsel for the respondents: government pleader for labour, government pleader for finance &planning, ms.g.sudha : : ?.cases referred: 1. (2001) 2 scc542. (2005) 2 scc3633. (2006) 1 scc4794. (2013) 10 scc324hon'ble sr.justice a. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... party company before the special court, in cr.lmp no.656 of 2003 in crime no.1 of 2003. some depositors filed complaint under the provisions of sec.138 of ni act against the opposite party company on the file of jmfc, mahabubnagar. both courts issued warrant against the opposite party company. 4. the opposite party company ..... judicial first class magistrate, special mobile court, mahaboobnagar have no jurisdiction to entertain the cases either for recovery of amount alleged to be due from m/s vahini finance and chit fund private limited, mahaboobnagar or for prosecution of its directors. in the circumstances, there shall be interim stay of the proceedings initiated by respondents 3 ..... a certain period, only then the non-bailable warrants should be issued. 16. procedure as contemplated under section 200 cr.p.c. has to be followed as section 27 of c.p. act compared to sec.25 of the act is criminal in nature and sworn statement of the complainant has to be recorded with respect to non-compliance .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... that the flat no.205 was delivered to the appellant in december, 2009 itself. the respondent submitted that the complainant is not a consumer as defined under section 2(1)(c) of consumer protection act, 1986 and as such the complaint is liable to be dismissed with costs. the respondents submitted that the appellant is due a sum of rs.3,95 .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... ,1996 against the appellant and shriram transport finance company ltd restraining them from alienating the lorry till disposal of the suit and she had withdrawn the o.p. ..... approaches the court the period spent between the filing of the complaint and the disposal of the matter today by us will be excluded under section 14 of the limitation act, 1963 in the light of the decision of the honble supreme court in trai foods ltd vs national insurance company ltd and others? ..... finance company ltd furnished copy of the loan agreement to the respondent. 6. on request of the respondent, the appellant-bank appointed sole arbitrator, sri k.l.narsiah, retired senior civil judge. the respondent filed o.p.no. 72 of 2011 before the additional chief judge, city civil court, secunderabad under section 9(ii)(a) of arbitration and conciliation act .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... also notice that in parakunnan veetill joseph's son mathew v. nedumbara kuruvila's son, this court further cautioned that while exercising discretionary jurisdiction in terms of section 20 of the act, the court should meticulously consider all facts and circumstances of the case. the court is expected to take care to see that the process of the court ..... 2, his auditor to corroborate this, it is difficult to believe this story. the plaintiff was admittedly the managing partner of the said corporation which was dealing in finance. if there was a transfer of a share of mahaboob basha in the name of dw.2's wife, the question of obtaining the signatures of plaintiff on ..... agreement documents. this receipt ex.b.1 is scribed by dw.2 and it bears the signature of plaintiff and also bears a rubber stamp affixed stating ".for balaji finance corporation, managing director"..7. the plaintiff disputes that he executed this receipt ex.b.1 and contends that dw.2, (whose wife anasuyamma is a partner in the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... and father of the complainant who is an advocate thoroughly verified the said plan along with the title documents and having satisfied with the same approached the lic finance for sanction of housing loan. the ops never cheated the complainant and the regularized plan was obtained by the vendors of the ops and the same was ..... sft for regularization instead of ops provided a fake and fabricated proceedings and subjected the complainant and his family members under false impression. on account of the said acts of the ops, the entire funds spent on the flat by the complainant became stake as the title of the flat became defective. after issuing legal notice ..... bps regularization for the building nor the ops have constructed the apartment as per the norms and regularization of ghmc. immediately, the complainant applied under right to information act, seeking authenticated information about the bps status of the building from ghmc on 21.11.2012 and in response to it he received a letter roc. no. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... car. in another case, the honble national commission held in m/s telco ltd., another vs. m.moosa, 1986-94 page 1367 (ns) that the section 14(1) of the consumer protection act authorizes the forum to have the defects removed even if there are numerous defects which can be rectified and that it will be very hard on the ..... no.3 and 4 for purchase of the vehicle and the income on the vehicle is only source of his livelihood. the opposite parties no.3 and 4 admitted financing for purchase of the vehicle. the district forum opined that the amount borrowed for the purpose of purchasing the vehicle would weigh when balanced with the fact of registration ..... its part. the opposite party no.3 contended that the complainant is not a consumer insofar as the claim is concerned against it and it submitted that it has financed the vehicle and as the complainant became chronic defaulter, the opposite party no.3 issued notice informing its intention to repossess the vehicle. the opposite party no.3 submitted .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Hyderabad
..... agreement, the opposite party no.2 has to initiate the proceedings and recover the amount and recover the loan amount from the opposite party no.1. section 72 of the indian contract act runs as follows : a person to whom money has been paid, or anything delivered, by mistake or under coercion, must repay or return it. ..... between the complainant and opposite party no.1 and on 30-7-2008 the complainants and both the opposite parties signed the tripartite agreement according to which the finance amount is rs.43,88,528/-. the complainants submitted that the opposite party no.2 prepared loan agreement and made the complainants sign the loan documents and ..... cost of construction and in the event of opposite party no.1 failing to complete the project within the stipulated time, the complainant could withdraw from the financing scheme at any time without any liability and the amount would be adjusted between the opposite parties. the complainants submitted that the opposite parties promised that a .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Andhra Pradesh
..... compensation and such acquisition is for the public purpose. development, maintenance and management of the national highways encompasses several aspects and from the reading of section 16 of the act, 1988, it is reasonable to assume that what is envisaged in the process of development of toll plaza is also covered by the functions ..... . all toll plazas have similar facilities. the concessionaire was chosen only to implement the project and was to be implemented on the basis of design, built, finance, operate and transfer. thus, after the operating period is over, the entire assets get transferred to the authority. the land acquired remains with the government of ..... widening the national high way no.9 from kms 40.000 to kms 221.000 on the hyderabad - vijayawada section by four laning and subsequently to six laning thereon on the basis of design, build, finance, operate and transfer (dbfot) to the consortium comprising gmr infrastructure limited and punj lloyed limited (5th respondent). as .....
Tag this Judgment!