Array
(
[0] => ..... /s. jyoti sizing factory is one establishment and ordered that contributions be paid from september 1976 to august 1978 under the act of 1952 within 15 days failing which further proceedings under section 7a of the act of 1952 would be taken for determining the amount payable by the respondent-firm. the learned single judge ..... the tests which could be applied to decide as to what constitute one establishment would be unity of ownership, unity of management, supervision and control, unity of finance and employment, unity of labour and service conditions, functional integrity, general unity of purpose and geographical proximity.12. in south india mill owners' association v. ..... in each case. unity of ownership, management and control would be a relevant factor. general unity or functional integrity may also be relevant factor. unity of finance may not be an irrelevant factor. geographical proximity may also be of some relevance. in some cases the test would be whether one concern forms an .....
[1] => ..... of stock in the subsidiary 36 company are held as assets on the books of the parent company and can be issued as collateral for additional debt financing. holding company and subsidiary company are, however, considered as separate legal entities, and subsidiary is allowed decentralized management. each subsidiary can reform its own ..... :1999.4) scc458 g.buchivenkata rao v. uoi & ors. :1972.1) scc734 mohinder singh gill v. chief election commissioner, new delhi & ors. :1978.1) scc405 vehemently opposing the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned additional advocate general submitted that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has no ..... to be carrying on its business pursuant to the authority of the central government?. that obviously cannot be said of a company incorporated under the companies act whose constitution, powers and functions are provided for and regulated by its memorandum of association and the articles of association. an incorporated company, as it .....
[2] => ..... object of the statute and serve the purpose, for which it had been enacted, and should not efface its very purpose. vide reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance and investment co. ltd., air 1987 sc 1023; n.k. jain v. c.k. shah, air 1992 sc 1289; meera gupta v. state of west bengal and ..... not be permitted to perpetuate and perpetrate, defeating the legislative animation. the court cannot derive jurisdiction apart from the statute. vide smt. nai bahu v. lala ramnarayan and ors. : [1978]1scr723 ; natraj studios pvt. ltd. v. navrang studio and anr. air 1981 sc 537; sardar hasan siddiqui v. state transport appellate tribunal, : air1986all132 ; a.r. antuley ..... -petitioners and without informing them or giving any notice even subsequent thereto. endorsement/assignment did not involve the defendant-petitioners in any manner and in absence of any act on their part, it cannot be a 'cause of action' at all, which may create territorial jurisdiction of the civil court at jodhpur.35. the 'cause .....
[3] =>
)
Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : [2007(114)FLR394]; RLW2007(4)Raj2952
..... /s. jyoti sizing factory is one establishment and ordered that contributions be paid from september 1976 to august 1978 under the act of 1952 within 15 days failing which further proceedings under section 7a of the act of 1952 would be taken for determining the amount payable by the respondent-firm. the learned single judge ..... the tests which could be applied to decide as to what constitute one establishment would be unity of ownership, unity of management, supervision and control, unity of finance and employment, unity of labour and service conditions, functional integrity, general unity of purpose and geographical proximity.12. in south india mill owners' association v. ..... in each case. unity of ownership, management and control would be a relevant factor. general unity or functional integrity may also be relevant factor. unity of finance may not be an irrelevant factor. geographical proximity may also be of some relevance. in some cases the test would be whether one concern forms an .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
..... of stock in the subsidiary 36 company are held as assets on the books of the parent company and can be issued as collateral for additional debt financing. holding company and subsidiary company are, however, considered as separate legal entities, and subsidiary is allowed decentralized management. each subsidiary can reform its own ..... :1999.4) scc458 g.buchivenkata rao v. uoi & ors. :1972.1) scc734 mohinder singh gill v. chief election commissioner, new delhi & ors. :1978.1) scc405 vehemently opposing the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, learned additional advocate general submitted that the writ petition filed by the petitioner has no ..... to be carrying on its business pursuant to the authority of the central government?. that obviously cannot be said of a company incorporated under the companies act whose constitution, powers and functions are provided for and regulated by its memorandum of association and the articles of association. an incorporated company, as it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 2003(2)WLN55
..... object of the statute and serve the purpose, for which it had been enacted, and should not efface its very purpose. vide reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance and investment co. ltd., air 1987 sc 1023; n.k. jain v. c.k. shah, air 1992 sc 1289; meera gupta v. state of west bengal and ..... not be permitted to perpetuate and perpetrate, defeating the legislative animation. the court cannot derive jurisdiction apart from the statute. vide smt. nai bahu v. lala ramnarayan and ors. : [1978]1scr723 ; natraj studios pvt. ltd. v. navrang studio and anr. air 1981 sc 537; sardar hasan siddiqui v. state transport appellate tribunal, : air1986all132 ; a.r. antuley ..... -petitioners and without informing them or giving any notice even subsequent thereto. endorsement/assignment did not involve the defendant-petitioners in any manner and in absence of any act on their part, it cannot be a 'cause of action' at all, which may create territorial jurisdiction of the civil court at jodhpur.35. the 'cause .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur
SBC First Appeal No.469/2009 Ram Singh & Ors. vs. Bhikam Chand & Ors. Judgment dt:28. 1/2015 1/35 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN AT JODHPUR JUDGMENT Ram Singh & Ors. vs. Bhikam Chand & Ors. S.B.CIVIL FIRST APPEAL No.469/2009 DATE OF JUDGMENT :28. h January, 2015 PRESENT HON'BLE Dr. JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI Mr.Jitendra Chopra, for the appellant-defendants Mr. Suresh Shrimali, ]. Mr.Sundeep Bhandawat,]. for the respondent-plaintiffs. Mr.Ashok Patel, ]. BY THE COURT: REPORTABLE1 The defendants Ram Singh s/o Ghasi Ram & ors have filed the present first appeal under Section 96 CPC against Bhikam Chand s/o Ram Jeevan & anr. being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 12/8/2009 passed learned Addl. District Judge (Fast Track) No.3, Jodhpur in a suit for specific performance being Civil Suit No.603/2004 (351/2004) Bhikam Chand & Arun Kumar vs. Ram Singh s/o Ghasi Ram & Ors.2. The said suit for specific performance was filed by the plaintiffs Bhikam Chand & Ors. on 2/11/200...
Tag this Judgment!