Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 chapter iii direct taxes Court: rajasthan Page 19 of about 264 results (0.192 seconds)

Jun 11 1984 (HC)

Budha Ram and anr. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1985Raj104; 1984()WLN291

..... to sub-section (1), as from the date of the commencement of the rajasthan tenancy (amendment) act, 1979, hereinafter in this chapter referred to as the 'said date', become subject to the other provisions contained in this chapter, the khatedar tenant of that part of the land held by him in which he has not acquired ..... the rajasthan colonisation (allotment& sales of government land in rajasthan ,canal colony area) rules, 1975. 15. the rajasthan colonisation (jawai project land allotment and sale) rules, 1978. the above are not exhaustive. 54. the post- 1955 rules of 1971 were challenged and amended from time to time and ultimately they were repealed and then, fresh rules ..... mahajan v. state of maharashtra air 1977 sc 915; l. jagannath v. authorised officer, l. r. madurai air 1972 sc 425 state of maharashtra v. mansingh, air 1978 sc 916hasmukhlal v. state of gujarat air 1976 sc 2316 and harbanslal v. produce exchange corpn. air 1972 raj 214.75. before i proceed further to examinethe defence of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 28 1964 (HC)

Hamara Radio and General Industries Ltd. Co., Delhi Vs. State of Rajas ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1964Raj205

..... entrusted to a government or ruler shall be exercised subject to such conditions as may be imposed by the dominion government, including, notwithstanding anything in this act, any conditions with respect to finance, but it shall not be lawful for the dominion government so to impose any conditions regulating the matter broadcast by, or by authority of, the ..... state of rajasthan (hereafter referred to as the state) together with the recommendations contained in chapter viii of part ii of its report, are accepted by the parties hereto, subject to the following modifications.' it may be pointed out at this place that ..... and the raj-pramukh of rajasthan have entered into the following agreement, namely: the recommendations of the indian states finances enquiry committee, 194849 (hereafter referred to as the committee) contained in part i of its report read with chapters i, ii and iii of part ii of its report, in so far as they apply to the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 25 1980 (HC)

Associated Cement Companies Ltd. Vs. the State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1981Raj133

..... find no mistake in the above observation. each and every municipality is required to discharge primary and secondary functions of the board as mentioned in chapter vi of the act of the act of 1959. the members of the municipalities are elected representatives of the people. they know the peculiar need of each municipality and the paying ..... appellant has in entirety failed to prove that a prima facie case exists in its favour. 26. section 10 of the specific relief act provides that except as otherwise provided in this chapter, the specific performance of any contract may, in the discretion of the court, be enforced when there exists no standard for ascertaining ..... on the goods brought within the municipal limits by the appellant company. various regulations and restrictions provided under the act were also imposed. it is alleged that the appellant continued paying octroi duty up to december 6, 1978, and thereafter served a notice under section 80, code of civil procedure, on defendant no. 1 and .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 11 1993 (HC)

Rashid Khan Alias Rashid and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3776

..... be less than rs. one lakh, but which may extend to rs. 2 lakhs. section 27a provides deterrent punishment for financing illicit traffic and harbouring offenders in the same term. enhanced punishment is provided under sections 31 and 31a if the offence is ..... bail under the proviso to section 167(2), for the default of investigating agency is deemed to be released under the provisions of chapter xxxiii of the code. in natabar pardia v. the state of orissa, air 1975 sc 1465 : (1975 cri lj 1212 ..... the courts. it would be so under the command of the legislature.'in bashir v. the state of haryana, air 1978 sc 55 : (1978 cri lj 173) the question was whether a person released under the proviso to section 167(2) could later be ..... importance have been raised, which also involve interpretation of sections 36a and 37 of the narcotic drugs & psychotropic substances act, 1985 (in short, the act' or 'ndps act'). the questions may be formulated as under:-1. whether under the proviso (a) to section 167(2) of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 11 1989 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) Vs. J.K. Industries Ltd.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1991Raj45; 1991LC284(Rajasthan); 1990(49)ELT512(Raj); 1990(1)WLN675

..... of this that in the year 1976, certain concessions were granted as regards the recovery of excise duty. a slight change was made in those concessions came in 1978 and those concessions came to an end in the year 1980 and, thereafter, a policy statement was made by the minister of state for industry in the parliament ..... 8(l) of the central excise rules, 1944, which rule was enacted under section 37 of the central excises and salt act, 1944. it was submitted that from information made available from the records in the ministry of finance, the government while reviewing the benefit availed of by different tyre companies under the notification no. 88/ 84-ce came ..... companies came into existence modi rubber limited, appolo tyres ltd., vikrant tyre ltd. and m/s. j.k. tyres ltd. this scheme was later modified in the year 1978 and that came to an end in the year 1980.3. however, on the representation made by the newly established companies, which were set up at a substantially high investment .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 03 1991 (HC)

Jarnail Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1992CriLJ810; 1991(1)WLN476; 1991(2)WLN577

..... 397(1). on such a strict interpretation, only those orders would be revisable which are orders passed on the final determination of the action but are not appealable under chapter xxix of the code. this does not seem to be the intention of the legislature when it retained the revisional power of the high court in terms identical to ..... cr. p.c. he referred to amarnath v. state of haryana air 1977 sc 2185 : 1977 cri lj 1891 and madhu limaye v. state of maharashtra air 1978 sc 47 : 1978 cri lj 165 and urged that nemichand's case required reconsideration. learned single judge agreed with this contention and directed the matter to be placed before hon'ble the ..... to be an interlocutory order. learned addl. advocate general contends that section 11(1) of the special courts act is in pari materia with section 379(2), cr. p.c. and hence notwithstanding ratio in amarnath's case (supra) and madhu limaye (1978 cri lj 165) (sc) (supra) we should rule that an order framing charge is an interlocutory order .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 09 1985 (HC)

Prem Cables Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1986(9)ECC290; 1986(26)ELT886(Raj)

..... admissible and had been correctly rejected by non-petitioner no. 3. a revision was filed under section 36 of the central excises and salt act, 1944 before the government of india, ministry of finance, revenue department, new delhi. the petitioner's claim regarding revised classification list (i.e., claim to concessional rate of excise duty at 4 ..... only after the passing of the order by the government of india, that the benefit became available to the petitioner. the said order annexure 3 dated april 1, 1978 entitled the petitioner to the refund of the difference in the amount of excise duty between 5% and 4%. the petitioner submitted the revised classification list on april ..... excise, jodhpur; the order (annexure 5) dated october 29, 1975 of the appellate collector, central excise, new delhi; and the order (annexure 6) dated april 6, 1978 of the government of india, may be quashed insofar as the petitioner's claim for refund for the period commencing from june 1, 1970 to march 31, 1971, has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 28 1984 (HC)

Smt. Chand Kanwar Vs. Mannaram and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1986Raj2

..... v. pessumal, (1958) 65 acc cj 559 : (air 1964 sc 1736). para 12 of the decision in new asiatic insurance co. v. pessumal (supra), reads as under:'chapter viii of the act, it appears from the heading, makes provision for insurance of the vehicle against third party risks, that is to say, its provisions ensure that third parties who suffer on ..... motor accident claims tribunal, alwar in case no. 54/78. the award of compensation is of rs. 55,498.20 p. for the death of ranchhormal, administrative officer in finance department of national insurance company, jaipur.2. ranchhormal was 40 years of age and was getting rs. 1,850/- per month as salary in addition to the benefit of provident ..... his chances for further promotion were bright in the near future.3. it would be now relevant and useful to mention the facts leading to this accident. on 18th jan., 1978, the deceased was coming to jaipur from delhi travelling in bus no. dlp 5% which is said to have become out of order in the way near behror. thus, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 21 2001 (HC)

State of Rajasthan and ors. Vs. Vijay Shanti Educational Trust

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : RLW2003(4)Raj2568

..... different authors from time to time.40. in yet another book, hindi translation by nandkishore gobhil, published in 1998, - 'bhartiya darshan' (indian philosophy), (volume i) in chapter vi 'jainiyon ka anekantwadi yatharthwad' at pages 232 and 233 dr. s. radhakrishnan has described 'jainmat' and 'vardhman' as under :-1- tsuerftl izdkjcks yksx cq tkxfjr ..... ;iq.;k; ikik; ij ihmue~a 32. i the book, 'a study of religion', swami vivekananda (udbodhan office, 1 udbodhan lane, calcutta, tenth edition february 1978 published by swami vishwashrayananda) while quoting swami vivekananda from his lecture on the hindu religion' at brooklyn, dec. 30, 1894 at p. 125 it has been mentioned ..... . it may also suggest appropriate measures in respect of any minority to be undertaken by the central government or state governments. according to him, this act only regulates the development of the minorities and that is the basic and paramount object of this minority commission and his submission is that the rights' .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1968 (HC)

inderjit Singh Vs. Sunder Singh

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : AIR1969Raj155

..... that some more expenditure would have to be incurred in building the body, insuring thevehicle and meeting the registration and other charges which sunder singh was unable to finance. he therefore entered into agreement ex. 1 dated december 28, 1958 for a partnership with plaintiff inderjit singh. under that agreement, sunder singh retained a three ..... to relate to a consideration or object which was forbidden by section 59 of the motor vehicles act? 8. chapter iv of the motor vehicles act deals with the control of transport vehicles and while the earlier sections of the chapter deal with the necessity for permits and the mode of obtaining them etc., section 59 lays down ..... he thought it necessary to secure another bus for his permit and obtained a vehicle for that purpose from the new laxmi finance company ajmer, for rs. 21,000, on hire-purchase. the new laxmi finance company asked for security for the arrangement, and it was furnished by the plaintiffs father cyan singh at the instance of .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //