Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1978 chapter i preliminary Page 33 of about 13,325 results (1.026 seconds)

Jul 21 1995 (HC)

State of Andhra Pradesh and anr. Vs. P.L. Raju and Company

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1996(1)ALT144; 1996(2)ARBLR629(AP)

..... dispute in a pending suit, instead of being adjudicated by the court, is referred to arbitrator for decision. he also contends that the terms of section 3 of the interest act, 1978 have not been satisfied in this case and therefore, pendente lite interest should not have been awarded. 32. on the other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent mr. ..... and maintaining the service roads, and dewatering charges etc. no separate payment will be made to contractor on these amounts ...' in schedule 'a' to the agreement dated 10.2.1978, the description of the item was amended so as to be in conformity with the condition stipulated in para 7 of the foot note to schedule 'a' of tender, as ..... voligonda road. nalgonda district. the work was awarded to him pursuant to the acceptance of the respondent's tender. an agreement was entered into in this behalf on 10.2.1978. the site was handed over to him on the same day. the value of the work, as per the agreement was rs. 22 lakhs. a period of 18 months .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 25 1994 (SC)

Bar Council of India and Another Vs. Aparna Basu Mallick and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC1334; JT1994(1)SC141; 1994(1)SCALE194; (1994)2SCC102; 1994(1)LC257(SC)

..... in ll.b. course of the calcutta university as a non-collegiate woman candidate under regulation 35 of the calcutta university, first regulations, 1951 framed under the calcutta university act, 1951. the said regulation may be extracted at this stage.a woman candidate may be allowed to appear as non-collegiate student (1) at the preliminary law examination one ..... claims to have undertaken a three year ll.b (professional) course from may, 1975 and to have appeared in the examinations held in 1975, 1976 and 1978 and secured a degree in 1978. according to him the question paper setters and the examiners of the answer books were the same for non-institutional as well as institutional candidates and no ..... the bar council of india.(e) he fulfils such other conditions as may be specified in the rules made by the state bar council under this chapter.10. we are not concerned with sub-clause (iii-a) which concerns cases of persons who have undertaken the study from the academic year 1967-68 or prior .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 05 2006 (HC)

The Aligarh Muslim University Through Its Vice-chancellor Vs. Malay Sh ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2006(1)AWC992

..... gujarat panchayat service (absorption, seniority, pay and allowances) rules, 1965 and some other relief. to overcome the judgment of the high court gujarat panchayat (third amendment) act, 1978 was enacted. section 11(1) was omitted to get over the judgment that panchayat service is state service a further clause (c) was introduced after clauses (a) ..... has stated but only tried to support it, such support being necessary in the face of the current challenges.27. it is on record that the finances of the aligarh, muslim university became the headache of the government after incorporation; it is on record that some 74 acres of extra land went to ..... ) whether legislature enacting the validating act has competence over the subject- matter;(ii) whether by validation, the legislature has removed the defect which the court had found in the previous law; and(iii) whether the validating law is inconsistent (sic consistent) with the provisions of chapter iii of the constitution.113. again in paragraph .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 1981 (SC)

Vidya Charan Shukla Vs. Purshottam Lal Kaushik

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1981SC547; 1981(1)SCALE159; (1981)2SCC84; [1981]2SCR637

..... any one of these stages he cannot be chosen.' but this definition of 'disqualified' is in terms of section 7(b) meant for chapter iii, in part ii of the act; while section 100 falls in chapter iii of part vi. if the expression 'for being chosen' which is a central limb of the definition of 'disqualified', is given such ..... , until that appeal or application is disposed of by the court.then there is an explanation appended to this section, which is not material for our purpose.13. chapter i of part v includes sections 30 to 39 under the main heading 'nomination of candidates'. section 30 requires the election commission to appoint dates for making nominations, ..... has been placed on the decisions of this court in n. p. ponnuswami v. returning officer, namakkal constituency : [1952]1scr218 and m. s. gill v. chief election commr. : [1978]2scr272 .(ii) the term 'disqualified' in clause (a) of section 100(1), as defined in section 7(b) means 'disqualified for being chosen as, and for being, a member .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 18 2001 (HC)

Sri Ramdas Motor Transport Ltd. and ors. Vs. Karedla Suryanarayana and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : [2002]110CompCas193(AP)

..... their misdeeds and also to gain time to fabricate the documents, which are in their possession, in the event of his approaching the company law board under chapter vi of the companies act.310. in life insurance corporation of india's case : 1986(8)ecc189 their lordships of the supreme court held that (page 628) : 'generally and ..... earlier statement in the affidavits filed by the respondent-company, the fact remains that they have borrowed the amounts from the financial company, i.e., laxmi devi finance corporation. in the hire-purchase agreement they entered with that corporation they never stated that they are borrowing these monies for effecting repairs. the ninth petitioner in his ..... of the shareholders in the company might have not dared to open their mouth against the illegal actions of respondent no. 2 having burnt their fingers once in 1978 and having seen the plight of the petitioner, who is none other than the son-in-law of the second respondent and brother-in-law of the third .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2005 (HC)

The Commissioner, Bangalore Development Authority and anr. Vs. State o ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2006KAR318; 2006(1)KarLJ1

..... hold and dispose of property as a fundamental right is no more in the statute book. the said right was omitted by the constitution (forty-fourth amendment) act, 1978 which came into force from 20-6-1979. therefore, when the state acquires the land belonging to a citizen it does not amount to the fundamental right ..... connected with the acquisition shall be taken in the administrative department concerned in the secretariat, under orders of the minister-in-charge. if at all a self-financing scheme falls under item 36 of first schedule, in which event cabinet approval may be necessary, which is not the case pleaded or considered by the learned ..... metropolitan area.10. in order to appreciate these contentions, it is necessary to look into various provisions of the constitution and the relevant statutes. part xi, chapter i of the constitution deals with distribution of legislative powers between the parliament and legislature of states.article 245 provides for the extent of such powers and article .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 19 1982 (HC)

Khandelwal Metal and Engg. Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Delhi

Reported in : 1983LC91D(Delhi); 1983(12)ELT292(Del)

..... determined is whether brass scrap is obtained by the process of manufacture. if so, it was rightly incorporated as a sub-item in schedule to the excise act by the finance act, 1981. it would be no argument to say that even though obtaining brass scrap involves manufacture, it cannot be excisable because it is not the end product ..... to the import tariff provide by rule 1 that for legal purposes, classification shall be determined according to the terms of the headings and any relative section or chapter notes and, provided such headings or notes do not otherwise require, according to these provisions hereinafter contained. rule 3 of section 15 of the first schedule deals ..... argument that brass scrap is not a new product because it is a sub-standard item, stands negatived by d.c. & b. mills v. government of india 1978 t.l.r. 2094 where it was held that because the substance produced by the petitioner is sub-standard judged from the indian standards institution's specifications does not .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 24 2003 (HC)

V. Jaya Prakash Vs. Commissioner of Municipality, Khapra Municipality ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006(4)ALD807

..... , height and size of the room, lighting and ventilation, drains and sanitary conveniences, staircases etc. section 229 of the act enables to exempt any building from the provisions of chapter iv other than section 215 and specifically confers power on the commissioner to decide cases of temporary structures like temporary huts of ..... of india : air2000sc2689 , allahabad bank v. canara bank : [2000]2scr1102 , k. duraiswamy v. state of tamil nadu : [2001]1scr489 , reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance and investment co. ltd. : [1987]2scr1 , chief justice of a.p. v. l.v.a. dikshitulu : [1979]1scr26 , kehar singh v. state (delhi admn.) : 1989crilj1 ..... indian handicrafts v. union of india : air2003sc3240 , the supreme court applied the principle of purposive construction.24. in reserve bank of india v. peerless general finance and investment co. ltd. (supra), the supreme court observed :interpretation must depend on the text and the context. they are the bases of interpretation. one .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 25 1988 (HC)

Goa Bottiing Co. Pvt. Ltd. and anr. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1989(1)BomCR68

..... the prime minister, in his budget speech in support of the finance bill 1987, stated in unequivocal terms that the modvat system introduced in 1986-87 budget which was already covering 38 chapters of the excise tariff act was being extended to all the remaining chapters, except to petroleum, tobacco and textile products, and accordingly, ..... that article 14 strikes at arbitrariness in state action and ensures fairness and equality of treatment was re-affirmed in maneka gandhi's case, : [1978]2scr621 with the further observation that the principle of reasonableness which legally and philosophically is an essential part of equality or non-arbitrariness, pervade article ..... learned counsel placed reliance in support of the above submission in union of india v. kirloskar brothers ltd., dewas : 1978(2)elt690(mp) ; cannanore spg. and wvg. mills v.customs collector, cochin, : 1978(2)elt375(sc) and collector of central excise, bangalore v. wipro information technology .25. the above views were, however .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 07 1981 (HC)

Sundaram Textiles Ltd., Madurai Vs. Assistant Collector of Customs, Ma ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 1984(2)ECC265; 1983(13)ELT909(Mad); (1983)IIMLJ92

..... steamer 'clan macnair'. the goods were subject to levy of 100 per cent basic import duty under chapter 56 of first schedule of customs tariff act, 1975. it was also further subject to auxiliary duty of 20 per cent leviable under sub-section (1) of section 32 of finance act, 1976 together with additional duty leviable under section 3 of customs tariff ..... force upto and inclusive of december 31, 1978. on 5-1-1979 two fresh notifications nos. 6 and 7 exempting viscose staple fibre were issued, as a result of which it was exempted from the whole of duty of customs as well as 20 per cent leviable under s. 32 of the finance act, 1976. by notification no. 8 dated ..... of 1979 had come to be filed for the above said relief. 12. some arguments are advanced on respective sides. admittedly, the ship entered the territorial waters on 7-12-1978. on that date, it is the common case between the parties, there was a notification (notification no. 66) exempting viscose staple fibre from the whole of the duty .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //