Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1985(1)WLN791
..... provide pressure to be brought to bear on the partners to have the firm and themselves registered.32. in h.j. velu mudaliar and anr. v. sri venkateswara finance corpn. and ors. : air1971ap63 ; a single judge of the andhra pradesh high court without noticing the earlier judgments of that court expressed a discordant note. the learned ..... essential condition specified in section 69(2), enabling the partnership firm to file the suit.31. in firm of v. ramchandraiah gupta & am. v. ravula venkat reddy 1970 (1) andhra weekly reporter 243 chinnappa reddy, j., as he then was, approved the decision of the calcutta high court in hansraj manot's case (1962) 66 ..... kumar, a registered partnership firm of jodhpur. it was stated in the plaint that the plaintiff was a registered partnership firm duly registered under the provisions of the act and that there were three partners of the plaintiff firm, namely, sohanlal, gumanmal and mangilal. the plaint was signed on behalf of the partnership firm by sohanlal, .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : RLW2004(4)Raj2148; 2004(1)WLC512
..... prolong the execution proceedings despite the fact, in commercial transaction normally money is not used merely to earn only interest and interest over principal money against the judgment-debtor become finance available to the judgment-debtor which otherwise he would not have got from anyone else. this court can proceed only within the framework of the statutory provisions and can only .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1971WLN74
..... ksl 6598) in the month of february, 1967, in partnership with saroopa. they gave rs. 8000/- towards the part payment of its price. the residue was obtained from prakash financer. saroopa, who was in the service of k.b. singh (p.w. 11), left his job and started driving the ambassador car. the vehicle met with an accident in ..... or even all the material particulars. if such a view is adopted, it would render the evidence of accomplice wholly superfluous.in sheshanna v. state of maharashtra air 1970 sc 1330, it has been observed by his lordship ray, j. that the nature of the corroboration required is that it should be confirmatory evidence and in para ..... on the uncorroborated testimony of an accomplice.keeping in view the above authorities, it is clear that the combined effect of sections 133 and 114 illustration (b), evidence act, is that an accomplice is to give evidence and it is almost always unsafe to convict upon the evidence of an approver alone. therefore, though the conviction of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1972WLN78
..... bhartian chandra has filed an affidavit on behalf of the board wherein it has been stated that the board does not carry on any business but it simply finances the various institutions which manufacture khadi and other products of village industries and it gets money from the state budget and it advances money to such institutions. ..... within term 'industry' or not. the board was constituted under the enactment known as the rajasthan khadi and village industries board act, 1955. the functions of the board have been enumerated in chapter iii of that act. section 18 deals with these functions of the board and it reads as follows:section 18, functions of board: the ..... shri gupta's services this dispute was referred by the state government to the labour court, rajasthan, jaipur. the labour court by its award dated 18th of february, 1970, declared that the board comes within the definition of 'industry' and that shri gupta also falls within the ambit of the expression 'workman' as defined in section .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1988(1)WLN179
..... miscellaneous petitions.5. it was contended on behalf of the petitioners in both the miscellaneous petitions that the incident is alleged to have taken place on january 8, 1970, and after investigation the police had given a final report. the final report was accepted by the judicial magistrate, pali on april 2, 1971 and there was ..... before the chief judicial magistrate calcutta by one mahendra narain chaudhary against 12 appellants for offence under section 341 ipc and section 36(a)(g) of the bank regulation act. the offence was alleged to have been committed on october 31, 1977. after trial the magistrate acquitted all the appellants on june 27, 1978. grindleys bank ltd. ..... not. the chief presidency magistrate on the first complaint had judicially applied his mind to the material before him, and it could not be said that he had acted erroneously. althought an order of dismissal under section 203 cr. pc is not barred to the entertainment of the section complaint from the same fact. but it .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1978WLN(UC)167
..... criminal procedure came into force. the proviso to clause (b) of sub-section (2) of section 484 of the new code clearly jays down that every enquiry under chapter xviii of the old code which was pending on the date on which the new come came into force, shall be dealt with and disposed of in accordance with the ..... the application of sanwat raj against raid ram. after the decision of the appeal, sanwat raj non-petitioner no. 2, filed a complaint against the petitioner on 22nd july, 1970, in the court of the munsiff magistrate. balorta, under section 466. ipc because the sessions judge, which dismissing the appeal observed that sanwat raj was fee to take legal ..... by any of the parries to the proceedings before the change. it is, however, equally well-settled that the validity or operation of any order validly pissed or any act validly done by judicial tribunal under the procedural, law for the time being in force cannot be affected by any subsequent change in the said law. it, therefore, follows .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1985)49CTR(Raj)339
..... assessees liability to deduct tax at source from the payments made to non-residents and that in view of the aforesaid payments by the assessee under part b of chapter xvii of the act, the aac deleted the disallowance of rs. 2,36,007 made by the ito. with regard to the expenses claimed by the assessee, namely. rs. 3 ..... has placed reliance on gustad dinshaw irani v. cit : [1957]31itr92(bom) gappumal kanhiyalal v. cit : [1961]42itr446(all) and security printers of india (p.) ltd. v. cit : [1970]78itr766(all) . shri surolia, on the other hand, has submitted that the expenses in question have been rightly disallowed as the same were incurred during the period earlier than the ..... note of the decision of the privy council in basant rai takhat singhs case referred to by shri surolia.16. in security printers of india (p.) ltd.s case : [1970]78itr766(all) the assessee was a limited company. it was incorporated on 6-4-1957. for the asst. yr. 1958-59, the assessee claimed deduction of certain expenses. .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : 1998(3)WLC400; 1998(1)WLN438
..... . in the instant case satya deo sharma is the director of the company. according to the copy of memorandum there are only seven members of gurushikhar saving and finance (india) limited. the depositors from whom deposits have been obtained through agents have not been shown as subscribers or members in the memorandum. the alleged offence under ..... cognizable case which a court having jurisdiction over the local area within the limits of such station would have power to inquire into or try under the provisions of chapter xiii.15. section 156(1) does not indicate the grounds on the basis of which the police officer may exercise power under section 156(1) cr. p ..... will not be lightly undertaken. an investigation may seriously damage a company and should not be ordered without proper material gathered in the manner provided in the companies act. the power of investigation has been conferred on the central government on the faith that it will be exercised in a reasonable manner.25. relying on the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : (1970)ILLJ576Raj; 1968()WLN109
..... no circumstances be terminated, even with his consent if the result will be to leave him without a lien or a suspended lien upon a permanent post. chapter xiii in part v of the rajasthan service rules lays down the conditions for transfer of an employee to foreign service. as at the relevant time, that ..... farther applies to the transfer of a government servant to service paid from a panchayat samiti/zila parishad fund constituted under the rajasthan panchayat samitis and zila parishads act, 1959. nobody has even pretended that before placing the services of the petitioner or other such employees anybody had taken their consent for such a transfer. ..... excluding the electrical inspectorate of the state at the disposal of the rajasthan electricity board constituted on 28 june 1967 under the provisions of the central electricity (supply) act, 1948 (54 of 1948). the manner under which the service conditions are to be regulated, is indicated below:(1) the services of the government employees of .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan
Reported in : AIR2003Raj340; RLW2004(1)Raj373; 2004(1)WLC201
..... state machinery, the same casualty cannot be permitted to happen when this function is assigned to private individuals. the state is the guardian of the public finances. it was required to guard the same with jealousness. if the state machinery fails to perform this function properly, then courts would be justified to ..... petition claiming that in rule 32 of the rajasthan minor mineral concession rules, 1986 (hereinafter referred to as 'the rules of 1986') there is a chapter iv which deals with the royalty collection contract or excess royalty collection contract. rule 32 of this rule provides that royalty collection contract may be given ..... dealt with, by an appropriateorder in judicial review proceedings wherethe court concludes that the decision is suchthat no authority properly directing itself onthe relevant law and acting reasonably couldhave reached it.'63. the grant of contract provides as a first step a provisional selection. respondent no. 5 was provisionally selected. thereafter, .....
Tag this Judgment!