Court : Rajasthan State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC Jaipur
S.K.M. Lodha, President: (1) These are five connected appeals under Sec. 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (for short "the Act") arising out of a common order dated 17.10.89 passed in different five complaints. They were heard together and we consider it proper to dispose them of by a common order. (2) The facts leading to these five appeals are identical. We may notice the facts in Appeal No. 107 of 1989. The Complainant has stated in Complaint No. 288/89, which has given rise to Appeal No. 107 of 1989 that he resides within the local limits of the Municipal Council, Bikaner in the building known as Manohar Bhavan, which is situated near Lal Bahadur Sabji Mandi, Rani Bazar, Bikaner. The Opposite-Party did not pay any head to the complaints made by the complainants. They, therefore filed the complaints on 1.9.89 praying that the Opposite-Party may be directed to remove the pollution. After notice, the Opposite-Party Appellant reised a preliminary objection stating that the compla...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Rajasthan Jaipur
1. Dispute involved in these three writ petitions is between common parties, namely, management of M/s Tarachem Laboratories, Jaipur and workman S.K. Nagesh and, therefore, they were all clubbed and heard together and are being decided by this common order.2. Genesis of dispute lies in the initiation of proceedings before Labour Court, Jaipur by Notification dated 28.02.1979 making thereby reference of an industrial dispute as to validity of removal of workman S.K. Nagesh. M/s Tarachem Laboratories (for short, 'the management') in Writ Petition No.605/1996 has challenged order of Labour Court, Jaipur, dated 13.08.1984 by which Shri S.K. Nagesh was held to be 'workman' within meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, 'the ID Act'). Also under challenge in this writ petition is final award passed by Labour Court, Jaipur, dated 24.01.1995 declaring retrenchment of workman S.K. Nagesh to be illegal and holding him entitled to reinstatement with continuity of ...
Tag this Judgment!