Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 2 income tax Court: himachal pradesh Page 5 of about 504 results (0.203 seconds)

Sep 19 1984 (HC)

Dr. Sudesh Kumar Bhalla and ors. Vs. H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya and ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1986HP49

..... of the respondent-university and to cause an inquiry to be made in respect of any matter connected with the administration and finances of the respondent-university. sub-sections (2) to (5) of section 8 prescribe the mode of exercise of such right and make other incidental and ancillary provisions for the effective enforcement of the ..... such, the head of the respondent-university and shall exercise such powers and perform such duties as may be conferred or imposed on him by the act or the statutes, section 8, which is relevant for the purposes of the present case, deals with the powers of the chancellor in regard to visitation and inspection and ..... held to have been conferred by implication as a necessary corollary and as incidental or ancillary to the powers of visitation and inspection conferred upon him by the act. before issuing such directions it was not necessary to follow the prescribed procedure or to afford any opportunity of hearing to any authority of the respondent-university .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 13 2001 (HC)

Himachal Grameen Sanchayka Ltd. and anr. Vs. Reserve Bank of India

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : II(2003)BC361

..... is proper, illegaland unlawful. the counsel submitted that it was incumbent on the learned companyjudge to issue notice to the company as required by sub-section (2) of section 450 ofthe act and to afford opportunity of hearing. since it was not done, the order is inconsistentwith the violative of statutory provisions and is liable to be ..... to the company. in ouropinion, it cannot be said that in the light of cumulative facts and circumstances, nopower could have been exercised under sub-section (20 of section 450 of the act andno order of appointment of provisional liquidator could have been passed by thelearned company judge, ex parte. 29. mr. singh submitted that the so ..... opinion of the supreme court (majority), could not be held ultravires or unconstitutional. 33. a similar vie was taken by the supreme court in the subsequent decision inpeerless general finance and investment co. ltd. and anr. v. reserve bank of india,(1992) 1 comp lj 351 (sc) : air 1992 sc 1033. 34. regarding supply of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 25 2003 (HC)

H.P. State Industrial Development Corpn. Ltd. Vs. Chanana Steel Tubes ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [2004]52SCL206(HP)

..... established by the state government as for its object the 'financing of industrial concerns'. according to learned counsel, by necessary implication plaintiff shall be deemed to be a 'public financial institution'; within the meaning of section 2(h) of 1993 act, and section 4a of the companies act, 1956. thus, according to mr. chaudhary, this ..... by the state government which has for its object the financing of industrial concerns :now, therefore, in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-section (1) of section 46 of the state financial corporations act, 1951 (63 of 1951) the central government hereby directs that the provisions of the sections 29, 30, 31, 32, 32a, 32b, ..... of their pleadings.2. by referring to the provisions of section 2(h) of the recovery of debts due to banks and financial institutions act, 1993 (hereinafter referred to as '1993 act'), as well as the notification of the government of india, ministry of finance, department of economic affairs (banking division), dated 6-4 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 29 2009 (HC)

Om Dutt Vs. State of H.P. and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... or in connection with the management of the kutlehar forests immediately before the appointed day and has become an employee of the government under sub-section (1) of section 8 of the act.6. it appears ex-superintendent of kutlehar forests did not formally deliver all lands / buildings/ trees / other documents/ properties and fixed ..... (forests), government of himachal pradesh, authorized the divisional forest officer, una to enter upon the land and premises vested in the state government under section 4 of the act and to take over the possession of lands / buildings/ trees and all other documents / properties relating to kutlehar forests from the superintendent of kutlehar ..... kutlehar forests were regularized w.e.f. 7.2.1996 in accordance with the decision / guidelines issued by the committee comprising of f.c.-cum- secretary (finance), commissioner-cum-secretary (personnel) and commissioner-cum-secretary (forests) to the government of h.p. the petitioner on the basis of his date of birth .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 17 1978 (HC)

H.P. State Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Smt. Naroo Devi and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979HP1

..... a rule of the court, it may remit the award, it may set aside the award or it may modify the award. section 46 of the arbitration act says that the provisions of this act, except sub-section (1) of section 6 and sections 7, 12, 36 and 37 shall apply to every arbitration under any other enactment for the time being in force, as if ..... should be handed over to the party in whose favour it was given, to be filed in court;9. the award is exempt from stamp duty under punjab govt notification finance no. 80 of 15th jan. 1917, and the fact has been noted on the back of the award form for the convenience of the executing court;10. under rule 18 ..... co-operative bank filed an application for additional evidence in the high court under order 41 rule 27 c.p.c., and andlay, j., by his order, dated 4th dec. 1968 re-framed issue no. 1 in the following terms:'whether the himachal pradesh state co-operative bank limited are the assignees of the chamba state central cooperative bank limited in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 06 2000 (HC)

Abhilash Kumar and ors. Vs. H.P. Krishi Vishva Vidyalaya and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR2001HP25

..... the suspension of the respondent, the chancellor, in exercise of the powers vested in him under sub-section (5) of section 24, h. p. universities of agriculture, horticulture and forestry act, 1986 (act no. 4 of 1987). hereinafter referred to as the act, appointed shri yogesh khanna, financial commissioner-cum-secretary to the government of himachal pradesh to carry out ..... the vice-chancellor of the university in our view has to be made responsible to bear this liability from his personal funds without causing any loss to the finance of the university for the role he seems to have played as disclosed in the reply filed by the 1st respondent itself. this aspect also is one on ..... bad faith arises when the power is exercised for an improper motive, say, to satisfy a private or personal grudge or for wreaking vengeance of a minister as in section pratap singh v. state of punjab, ((1964) 4 scr 733 : air 1964 sc 72). a power is exercised maliciously if its repository is motivated by personal .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 11 1993 (HC)

Bhagat Singh Negi and ors. Vs. H.P. Housing Board and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1994HP60

..... ascertain these points, let us first look into the relevant statutory provision. 14. it is pertinent to note that the board was established under section 3 of the act. the purpose underlying the act is to provide all measures to be taken to deal with and satisfy the need of housing accommodation. once the board undertakes the housing scheme ..... . the purpose for which the site in question is being used is commercial one i.e., the construction of the flats of category ii under partial self-financing scheme at sanjauli to be allotted to the intending purchasers amongst the general public. taking into consideration the entire facts and circumstances and also topography of the area ..... is pointed out that the board got executive sanction of the government amounting to rs.96,64,480/- for the construction of 40 category ii class flats under self financing scheme, sanjauli, vide letter dated 27-7-1991 (annexure r-1). tender(s) (annexure r-2) for construction of 32 category ii flats were invited in .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 26 1994 (HC)

H.R.T.C. Staff Union Vs. H.R.T.C. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : (1995)IILLJ1001HP

..... . the himachal state road transport corporation, which has issued annexures pa to pc sought to be quashed, is a road transport corporation, established under section 3 of the act. that section empowers the state government to establish, by a notification in the official gazette, a road transport corporation, for the whole or any part of the ..... with the central government. 16. the provision for depreciation and reserves and other funds by the corporation is also controlled by the state government under section 29 of the act. the state government, from time to time, may direct the corporation to make provision for depreciation and for reserve and other funds, though, management ..... approval of the central government and the balance of the amount with the prior approval of the state government and central government, may be utilised for financing the expansion programmes and the remainder shall be made over to the state government for the purpose of road development. thus the disposal of the net .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 12 1998 (HC)

Mazboot Packers and Engineers Company Vs. Himachal Pradesh Horticultur ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : [1999]95CompCas579(HP)

..... failed to take delivery of the cartons nor any fresh schedule for the delivery was sent. ultimately, the petitioner-company sent a notice as contemplated under section 434 of the act calling upon the respondent-company to refund the amount of security of rs. 1,46,700. the respondent-company has failed to refund the amount of ..... the said security amount. 6. it was also pleaded that the respondent-company has a sound financial position, since being a government company it is being fully financed by the government of himachal pradesh to meet all its financial obligations and that it is in a position to discharge all its financial obligations in accordance with law ..... by time as on the date of the presentation of the present petition. therefore, there was no legally recoverable debt within the meaning of section 433 of the act. article 70 of the limitation act, 1963, prescribes a period of three years for the recovery of movable property deposited or pawned from a depository or pawnee. there is .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2007 (HC)

Ayush Constructions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... (supra) whereby the chief engineer (south), hppwd had appointed the arbitrator. he further submits that i should instead appoint an arbitrator exercising my jurisdiction under section 11(6) of 1996 act.12. the prayer of mr. burathoki is accepted and allowed. order no. pw-ctr-30-949/-07-10173-75 dated 6th august, 2007 is hereby quashed ..... the procedure prescribed in the arbitration agreement in the sense that they did not appoint the arbitrator and thus consequently, i would be entitled to invoke section 11(6) of 1996 act, i should merely issue a direction upon respondent no. 1 to appoint the arbitrator. the argument is totally devoid of any merit if one ..... chief engineer appointing the arbitrator after the petition stood filed in this court is clearly in violation of the ratio in the case of datar switchgears ltd. v. tata finance ltd. and anr. reported in : (2000)8scc151 . dealing with an identical fact situation where the appointing authority had appointed the arbitrator at a point of time .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //