Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1968 section 2 income tax Court: himachal pradesh Page 10 of about 504 results (0.255 seconds)

Manu Goel and Others Vs. Tarsem Chand JaIn and Others

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... of right to know and lender's liability of fairness to keep the borrower informed particularly of the developments immediately before taking measures under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the act. it will also cater the cause of transparency and not secrecy and shall be conducive in building an atmosphere of confidence and healthy commercial practice ..... . there may be some meaningful consideration of the objections raised rather than to ritually reject them and proceed to take drastic measures under sub-section (4) of section 13 of the act. once such a duty is envisaged on the part of the creditor it would only be conducive to the principles of fairness on the ..... ) of section 13. such reasons, overruling the objections of the borrower, must also be communicated to the borrower by the secured creditor. it will only be in fulfillment of a requirement of reasonableness and fairness in the dealings of institutional financing which is so important from the point of view of the economy of the .....

Arun Kumar Vs. Prakash Chand Gupta

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... in the special statute supersede the general law of tenancy if the provisions of the special statute are incompatible with the general law of tenancy. under section 14 of the rent act, mere knowledge of the landlord about occupation of the tenanted premises by the said registered society and acceptance of rent for the tenanted premises tendered by ..... on any evidence. therefore, the findings recorded by the courts below do not warrant interference by this court in the exercise of its revisional jurisdiction under section 15(5) of the act. 38. the learned single judge of punjab and haryana high court in jai lal jangra vs. vishav karama mandir dharamshala, ganaur mandi, 2005(1) civil ..... the tenant and the alleged sub-tenant. a person having secured a lease of premises for the purpose of his business may be in need of capital or finance or someone to assist him in his business and to achieve such like purpose he may enter into partnership with strangers, quite often partnership is entered into .....

Parkash Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and ors.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1987HP54

..... of the sum due at the foot of the over draft account. the dispute between the parties was referred to arbitration under section 72 of the himachal pradesh co-operative societies act, 1968 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act').2. on july 5, 1985, the arbitrator made the impugned award, annexure-p-4, which reads as follows :'that the ..... applicant as arrears of land revenue. announced ex parte.'3. the petitioner, feeling aggrieved by the award preferred an appeal before the registrar, co-operative societies, under section 93 of the act, on sept. 3, 1985. the appeal was heard and dismissed by an order dated march 3, 1986, passed by the assistant registrar, co-operative societies mandi ..... -8-1985, the applicant will have a right to get the movable and immovable property of the respondent attached by civil court under section 87(i)(b) of the himachal pradesh co-operative societies act as arrears of land revenue.if still some amount remains due, then, the sureties (1) shri kasturi lal s/o shri yog .....

Moti Ram and anr. Etc. Vs. Moti Ram

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1991HP68

..... person stands indicated as having rendered any assistance to shri shiv lal. corrupt practice for the purposes of electoral law strictly means what has been stated in the act. section 123(7) does not apply to this case for this reason as well.24. shri indar singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, has endeavoured to develop another ..... of para 7(e) may now be reproduced since, according to the respondent, these averments per se constitute allegations of corruption within the ambit of section 123 (7) of the act. para 7(e) runs as follows :-'that the state government cannot sit over arbitrarily on the resignation so submitted and accept the same at its ..... pohtostat copies of the election petition were furnished to the respondent without any attestation whatsoever. this was held to be insufficient compliance of the provisions of section 81(3) of the act.11. shri indar singh, learned counsel for the petitioners, on the other hand, sought reliance from murarka p adhey shyam ram kumar v. roop .....

Hem Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... above. hence, the present appeal. 6. shri m.l. brakta, learned counsel for the accused-appellant vehemently argued that there is non-compliance of section 42 (2) of the act and further that the independent witnesses have turned hostile. the statements of the official witnesses are contradictory, which render the prosecution case a suspect. 7. on ..... p.m. negi, learned deputy advocate general supported the impugned judgment of conviction and sentence and submitted that the recovery from a public place under section 42(2) of the act is not attracted and further that the contradictions, as pointed out by the learned counsel for the appellant-accused, are of very minor nature which ..... tea stall being run by the accused, which is a public place . consequently, i have no hesitation in coming to the conclusion that provisions of section 42 of the act are not applicable in the present case. though, an attempt was made by the investigating officer to satisfy these provisions and i also do not find .....

Paramjit Singh Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1979HP17

..... that even this contention is devoid of merits, because the third ground on which an award can be challenged under section 30 of the act is that the award has been improperly procured or is otherwise invalid. in this case, the award is found to be invalid because all the proceedings taken ..... contended by shri paul on behalf of the state that the award given by an arbitrator can be challenged only on one of the three grounds mentioned in section 30 of the arbitration act, and since the present contention does not fall within any of thethree grounds, the award of the arbitrator cannot be challenged on this ground. i find ..... of the fact that he has appeared before the arbitrator during all stages of the proceedings before him and has also once sought the extension of lime under section 28 of the act. in my opinion, even this contention is not available to the respondent-state, because if the proceedings before the arbitrator were void ab initio then no amount .....

Kanhya and anr. Vs. the State

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1951HP35

..... 19-12-1949 convicting and sentencing the two accused kanhya and sahnu, the former under clauses (a) and (f) and the latter under clause (f) of section 19, indian arms act, is sat aside, and they are acquitted. the fines, if already realised, shall be refunded to them. the pistol shall be confiscated to the government and ..... the two guns, it has come in evidence that they bad been left with him for repairs. there is nothing in the arms act necessitating a repairer to obtain a licence. section 5 of the act prohibits unlicensed manufacture, conversion or sale, or the keeping, offering or exposing for safe of any arms, ammunition etc.; but manufacture is ..... time to come. if follows, therefore, that no proceedings in chamba district could be instituted against any person in respect of an offence punishable under section 19 (f) arms act, without the previous sanction of the district magistrate. no such previous sanction had been obtained in the present case. kanhya'a trial for an offence under .....

Meena Ram Vs. State of H.P. and anr.

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1990CriLJ1347

..... he was necessarily in lawful possession of the property which was the subject-matter of the theft and he is not, therefore, entitled to recover the property under section 517, criminal procedure code.''6. in the instance case, even though the non-applicant has been acquitted, due to incomplete evidence, it would not be proper exercise of discretion ..... this order. hence this petition.2. the facts, in brief, are that the petitioner and respondent no. 2 were prosecuted under section 379 of the indian penal code and sections 41 and 42 of the indian forest act, 1927. it is alleged that on 19-11-1982, kedar singh, inspector c.i.d., was present at kotkhai in ..... case by the prosecution indicate that the property belongs to the government. it is relevant to refer to section 69 of the indian forest act :'when in any proceedings taken under this act, or in consequence of anything done under this act, a question arises as to whether any forest-produce is the property of the government, such produce .....

State of Himachal Pradesh Vs. Ram Chander

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1990ACJ592

..... code and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for one month. the accused is further to pay a fine of rs. 2,000/- under section 117 of the motor vehicles act and in default of payment of fine to undergo simple imprisonment for six months. the accused is further sentenced to pay a fine of rs. 100/- for ..... magistrate, 1st class (ii), shimla, in case no. 174/2 of 1983, decided on31.12.1985. it relates to an offence under sections 279 and 337, indian penal code read with sections 117, 3 and 112 of the motor vehicles act. the brief facts of the case are that on 17.8.1985 the police reached at the place of accident near the ..... .9. i, therefore, allow this appeal, set aside the judgment dated 31.12.1985 and convict the accused for offences under sections 279 and 337 of the indian penal code read with sections 117, 3 and 112 of the motor vehicles act. on the point of sentence looking to the fact that the accident took place on 17.8.1983 and considerable period .....

Amar Nath Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh

Court : Himachal Pradesh

Reported in : 1990CriLJ506

..... the same by way of this petition.2. the facts, in brief, are that the petitioner was prosecuted for an offence under section 33 of the indian forest act, 1927 (hereinafter referred to as 'the act'). he was accused of felling 15 khair trees unauthorisedly from private area of tika kholi, tika sai and gadiara. he was also accused ..... he was necessarily in lawful possession of the property which was the subject-matter of the theft and he is not, therefore, entitled to recover the property under section 517, criminal procedure code.'6. in the instant case, even though the non-applicant has been acquitted, due to incomplete evidence, it would not be proper exercise of discretion ..... him need not be returned to him in view of the evidence to the contrary on this aspect.section 69 of the act reads as under:'when in any proceedings taken under this act, or in consequence of anything done under this act, question arises as to whether any forest-produce is the property of the government, such produce .....