Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 51 amendment of section 206 Page 1 of about 13,869 results (0.415 seconds)

Andhra Re-rolling Works Represented by Its Partner, Dhirajlal T. Kapad ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1979(4)ELT661(AP)

..... 123/65 -- dated 14-8-1965.in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the central excise rules, 1944, the central government hereby makes the following amendment in the notification of the government of india in the ministry of finance (department of revenue) ..... 206/63 dated 30-11-1963 as amended by notification ..... 206/63 dated 30-11-1963 as amended by notification ..... 206/63, dated 30-11-1953 issued by the government of india as amended by notification ..... 26aa of the first schedule to the central excises and salt act, 1944 (1 of 1944) made from any of the following materials or a combination thereof, namely : --(i) fresh unused re-rollable scrap on which the appropriate amount of duty of excise has already been ..... 206/63--dated 30-11-1963.in exercise of the powers conferred by sub-rule (1) of rule 8 of the central excise rules, 1944 and in suppression of the notification of the government of india in the ministry of finance (department of revenue) ..... (ia) of 26aa reads as follows : --'bars, rods, coils, wires, joists, girders, angles, channels, tees, beams, zeds, trough, piling and all other rolled, forged or extruded shapes and sections, not specified.'7. ..... 206/63 dated 30-11-1963 as amended by notification no 123/65 dated 14-8-1965 exempting ..... 206/63, central excise, dated the 30th november, 1963, namely : --in the said notification, in paragraph one, after item (iii) the following item shall be and shall be deemed always to have been inserted, namely --(iv) ingots, on .....

Ags Entertainment Private Limited Vs. Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... constitution of india praying to issue a writ of declaration, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under article 226 of the constitution of india declaring that section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the finance act, 1994 as amended by finance act, 2010 unconstitutional and ultra vires, article 246 of the constitution of india read with entry 54 of list ii of schedule vii and article 14 of the constitution ..... article 226 of constitution of india praying to issue a writ of declaration, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under article 226 declaring that section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the finance act, 1994 as amended by finance act, 2010 unconstitutional and ultra vires, article 246 of the constitution of india read with entry 54 of list ii of schedule vii and article 14 ..... article 226 of constitution of india praying to issue a writ of declaration, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction under article 226 declaring that section 65(105)(zzzzt) of the finance act, 1994 as amended by finance act, 2010 unconstitutional and ultra vires, article 246 of the constitution of india read with entry 54 of list ii of schedule vii and article 14 of ..... johar's case (air1965sc1082= (1965) 2 scr112 that there is a sale only when the purchaser exercises the option to purchase which is at a later date and therefore only the depreciated value of ..... johar's case, (air1965sc1082= (1965) 2 scr112 this court held that the states can tax hire-purchase transactions resulting in sale but only .....

G.V.Matheswaran Vs. the Union of India

Court : Chennai

..... 33 w.p.nos.14887, 19322, 20982 and 24804 of 2010 are filed seeking a writ of prohibition prohibiting the respondents from (a) giving effect to the provisions of section 65(90a) read with section 65(105)(zzzz) of the finance act, 1994 as amended by the finance act, 2007 and finance act, 2010 (b) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the petitioner, any service tax under the said provisions and (c) levying or attempting to levy, collect or recover from the land owners of the petitioner, any service ..... 32 w.p.nos.24586 and 24588 of 2010 are filed seeking to declare that (i) the impugned provisions, i.e.section 65(105)(zzzz) read with section 65(90-a) of the finance act, 1994, as amended by the finance act, 2010, as null and void and ultra vires and violative of entry 49, list-ii, seventh schedule, articles 14, 19 and 246(3) of the constitution of india, (ii) section 76(a)(6)(h) and section 77 of the finance act, 2010 as null and void and ultra vires the constitution of india insofar as the petitioners are concerned; and (iii) the notification ..... 51 w.p.no.8932 of 2011 is filed by the tamil nadu slum clearance board, seeking to declare the provision of sub-section 9(a) of section 65 of the finance act, as amended by the finance act, 2007, as invalid and this court is not inclined to go into the same as the said provision is intra vires of the constitution in view of the decision taken by this court in paragraph no.30 above, following the decision in home solutions .....

Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala Vs. K. Srinivasan

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1972SC491; [1972]83ITR346(SC); (1972)4SCC526; [1972]2SCR309

..... section 95 which was omitted by the finance act of 1965 contained similar provision with regard to ..... reference being sought the following question of law was referred to the high court :-whether the words 'income tax' in the finance act of 1964 in sub-section (2)(a) and sub-section (2)(b) of section 2 would include surcharge and additional surchargethe high court answered the question in the negative and m favour of the assessee.3. ..... although under the act section 4 is the charging section income tax can be charged only where the central act which, in the present case, will be the finance act enacts that income shall be charged for any assessment year at the rate or ..... section 2 of the finance act 1971 is to the effect that the provisions of section 2 and of the first schedule to the finance act 1970 shall apply in relation to income tax for the assessment year or as the case may be the financial year commencing on the first day of april 1971 as they apply in relation to income tax for the assessment year commencing on first day of april 1970 with certain modifications set out in the section ..... section 3(1) of that act read :subject to the provisions of this section the rates of income tax and rates of super tax...imposed by sub-section (1) of section 7 of the indian finance act 1940 shall, in respect of the year beginning on the first day of april 1940 be increased by a surcharge for the purpose of the central government....similar phraseology was employed in respect of surcharge .....

Kanoria Industries Ltd. Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2005(190)ELT295(Kar)

..... provisions of law or rule and therefore there was no occasion at all for the parliament to have enacted a validating levy and if there was no occasion, the very provisions of section 112 of the finance act, 2000 cannot be sustained inasmuch as it is the submission of learned counsel for the petitioners that there was no cause of action for the parliament to make such a law, ..... has been deprived of modvat credit to which the petitioners are otherwise entitled to in terms of the rules governing allowing of modvat credit, only because of the provisions of section 112 of the finance act, 2000, the petitioners are entitled to question the legality of this provision and further submits that even the supreme court while disposing of the review petition in the case ..... court had earlier dismissed the appeal of the revenue as against this order, nevertheless, the revenue having brought to the notice of the supreme court the provisions of section 112 of the finance act, 2000, which was enacted as a validating legislation and which had now virtually taken away any benefit or concession that had been given to an assessee under the ..... have continued to reap the benefit of modvat credit and the petitioner therefore feeling aggrieved by this endorsement as also the provision of section 112 of the finance act, 2000, has challenged the constitutional validity of this statutory provision and for quashing the consequential endorsement and further direction for restoration of the modvat credit entry.4. .....

Merit Enterprises Vs. Dy. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Reported in : (2007)288ITR226(Hyd.)

..... there is no distinct and independent charge whereby surcharge can be said to have been levied on undisclosed income determined for a block period under chapter xivb.12.72 even otherwise, we find that the finance act(s), prior to amendment in section 113 of the act, did not satisfy the four components which enter into the concept of tax and some of these components are not clearly and definitely ascertainable, in order to be treated as an independent and distinct levy ..... the provisions of this act, and in relation to any other assessment year income-tax and super-tax ..... of rates income-tax specified in this behalf in the finance act of the relevant year or the rate or rates of income-tax specified in an agreement entered into by the central government under section 90, whichever is applicable by virtue of the provisions of section 90; "regular assessment" means the assessment made under sub-section (3) of section 143 or section 144; "tax" in relation to the assessment year commencing on the 1st day of april, 1965, and any subsequent assessment year means income-tax chargeable under .....

Karvy Consultants Limited Vs. Government of India

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2006[]STR75

..... information technology service' means any service in relation to designing, developing or maintaining of computer software, or computerized data processing or system networking, or any other service primarily in relation to operation of computer systems.section 65(19), as amended by finance act, 2004 with effect from 10-9-2004, reads thus :-business auxiliary service' means any service in relation to :-(i) promotion or marketing or sale of goods produced or provided by or belonging to the client; ..... in this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a declaration that section 65(19) of the finance act, 1994, as amended by the finance act of 2003, has no application to the petitioner's service namely 'registrar and transfer agency ..... the show cause notice was issued after strictly construing section 65(19) of the finance act, 2003, that the functions of the registrar and share transfer agent is a service rendered which is in the nature of incidental or auxiliary support service rendered in ..... transfer agent, is in the nature of incidental or auxiliary support service in the sale of goods (securities) belonging to the client and falls within the purview of section 65(19)(iv) of the finance act, 2003, that the impugned show cause notice merely demanded service tax on service charges collected by the petitioner towards such services rendered from 1-7-2003 to 31-1-2004, that .....

State of West Bengal Vs. Calcutta Club Limited

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... in the result, these petitions are allowed and it is hereby declared that section 65(25a), section 65(105) (zzze) and section 66 of the finance (no.2) act, 1994 as incorporated/ amended by the finance 60 act, 2005 to the extent that the said provisions purport to levy service tax in respect of services purportedly provided by the petitioner club to its ..... the impugned judgment dated 15th march, 2012 by the high court of jharkhand set out the relevant provisions of the finance act, 1994 (hereinafter referred to as the finance act ), by which service tax was levied on members clubs, and arrived at the conclusion that such clubs stand on a different footing from proprietary clubs, as has been held in young men ..... . the explanation to section 65, which was inserted by the finance act of 2006, reads as follows: explanation: for the purposes of this section, taxable service includes any taxable service provided or to be provided by any unincorporated association or body of persons to a member thereof, for cash, deferred payment or ..... immediately before the appointed day to pay tax under section 4 or section 8 of the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941 (bengal act vi of 1941), and who 17 (ii) would have continued to be so liable on such appointed day under that act had this act not come into force, or whose gross turnover during a year first exceeds the taxable quantum as applicable to him under the bengal finance (sales tax) act, 1941, on the day immediately preceding the appointed ..... [(1965) .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. L.G. Balakrishnan

Court : Chennai

Reported in : [2002]255ITR339(Mad)

..... in the respective assessments in the absence of particulars furnished by the assessee 2. whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and having regard to the provisions of rule 9(5) of part iv of the first schedule to the finance act, 1979, the appellate tribunal was right in holding that there was neither an obligation on the assessee to return the net agricultural loss for the earlier years in the assessment of those years nor a duty ..... assessee is not to be denied the benefit of set off provided for in rule 9 of part iv of the first schedule to the finance act, 1979, as long as the assessee is able to show that he had incurred loss from his agricultural activities in the earlier assessment years after a computation made in accordance with the requirements of the rules provided in the relevant finance acts and that such loss had not been set off against the agricultural income of earlier years ..... . if the assessee is able to show that the result of the computation by applying the rules set out in the finance acts of 1974 and subsequent years prior to 1979, is a loss, the assessee is not to be denied the benefit of having that loss set off against the agricultural income of the previous year relevant to the assessment ..... despite the absence of provisions similar to sections 80 and 139(3) with regard to the need for having the loss determined in the relevant assessment year before claiming the right of carry forward of the loss to subsequent assessment years, the revenue .....

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Shri Rangnath Bangur and Shri Purshotta ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : (1984)41CTR(Raj)21; [1984]149ITR487(Raj)

..... even without the proviso, the rate prescribed by the finance act of the previous year would have been applicable to the dividend income by virtue of the provisions of section 2(3)(a) of the relevant finance act; but the very same provisions have been added to para, 6a, in the form of a proviso and the same would make no difference to the interpretation of the main enacting part of para. ..... the proviso, as mentioned above, merely makes the provisions of section 2(3)(a) of the finance act applicable in the calculation of rebate or concession relating to dividend income or deemed dividend income. ..... section 2(3)(a) of the finance act of each of the years 1952, 1953, 1954 and 1955 provided that in case the total income of an assesses included income from dividends, in respect of which the assesses himself would be deemed to have paid income-tax imposed under the act by virtue of the provisions of section 49b of the 1922 act, such assessee shall be deemed to have paid income-tax on that part of the total income at a rate applicable to the total income of the assessee in the ..... the obvious object of the concession provided by the taxation laws (extension to merged states and amendment) act of 1949 and by the part b states (taxation concessions) order, 1950, was to provide rebate to the assesses of the former indian states, in order to avoid hardship and anomalies and to remove difficulties that may arise on account of .....