Finance Act 1965 Section 31 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: finance act 1965 section 31 Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 583 results (0.636 seconds)Tata Teleservices Vs. Union of India
Court : Gujarat
Decided on : Feb-05-2016
..... the act had already expired on 31 3 2011 and 31 3 2012 respectively much prior to amendment in section 201 as amended by finance act 2014 euro ldquo therefore section 201 3 of the act ..... s s gadgil v m s lal and co reported in air 1965 sc 720 para 12 and 13 2 j p jani ito v induprasad devshanker ..... s s gadgil v lal and co 1964 53 itr 231 air 1965 sc 171 in that case a notice was issued against the assessee .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMs Vijeta Projects and Infrastructures Limited Through Its Managing Di ...
Court : Jharkhand
Decided on : Sep-05-2016
of interest in terms of section 43 of the bihar finance act thereby leading to a saving for the government similarly as per section 55 of the jharkhand value added tax act 2005 6 per annum will accrue from lapse of six that the commercial taxes department should be directed to invoke section 25 a 6 of the bihar finance act and to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHewlett Packard Financial Services India Private Limited Vs. The State ...
Court : Karnataka
Decided on : Feb-19-2016
and others 2010 34 vst 509 sc 4 20th century finance corporation vs state of maharashtra reported at 2000 vo 119 pay duty nil duty or concessional duty under the customs act if the contention raised by the petitioner that it is and sub section 5 2 in particular as well as section 3 and definition of sale u s 2 g of is dated 17th april 1998 v supplementary lease agreement dated 31st july 1998 b factual matrix prevailing in the present appeals
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAjay Kumar M. Singh Vs. Basant Bhoruka
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jul-18-2016
digital world india ltd and m s digital leasing and finance ltd and accordingly i have confirmed the signatures of defendant such a request for registration both sections 17 of registration act and section 100 of the transfer of property act make registrar of cooperative societies d ward exercising his powers under section 101 of the mcs act 1960 observed in paragraph 8 bhoruka family trust by a registered indenture of transfer dated 31 12 1999 q 73 whether you consented to such transfer
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLogic Eastern India Private Limited Vs. KEC International Limited(Cabl ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Aug-02-2016
in the case of jasvinder kaur vs l and t finance ltd delivered on 12th march 2015 in arbitration petition no and would submit that under section 3 of the arbitration act any written communication is deemed to have been received if a complaint against the petitioner on 14th january 2008 under section 138 of the negotiable instruments act the petitioner thereafter along directing the petitioner to pay a sum of rs 13 31 40 938 56 with interest 14 p a w e
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHubtown Limited Vs. IDBI Trusteeship Service Limited
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Oct-24-2016
..... by the commercial division court 31 having once observed that the appeal under section 13 of the commercial courts act is maintainable we are dealing ..... r savarna prabhu and anr vs videocon leasing and industrial finance limited and anr 2013 14 scc 606 48 the learned single judge ..... chattanatha karayalar vs the central bank of india ltd air 1965 sc 1856 has observed as under 3 the principle is well established .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/s. Fenner (India) Ltd. Vs. M/s. Brahmaputra Valley Fertilizer Corpor ...
Court : Delhi
Decided on : Jan-08-2016
case of booz allen and hamilton inc vs sbi home finance ltd and ors supra held as follows 42 from the material for the purpose of section 8 of the arbitration act is that there should be existence of difference or disputes of the present case the defendant in its application under section 8 of the act has spelt out the reasons for rs 88 95 lacs was received by the plaintiff on 31 08 2009 leaving a balance of rs 1 52 00
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWaverley Private Limited Vs. Diversey India Private Limited
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-04-2016
m s chebrolu enterprises v andhra pradesh backward class coop finance corpn ltd comparative citation 2016 5 bcr 208 issued by the petitioner post 31st august 2008 and had acted upon such transactions it is clear that the agreement dated and stands disposed of accordingly arbitration and conciliation act 1996 section 34 jurisdiction extension of agreement single judge allowed application filed unreported judgment dt 21 01 2014 in arb pet no 314 2013 by bombay high court rightly observed are of no
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAnilkumar Phoolchand Sanghvi and Another Vs. Chandrakant P. Sanghvi an ...
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-01-2016
not be entertained the reliance was placed on kotak mahindra finance ltd vs t thomas educational trust and others 2003 5 on record is already recorded above as basic cause of action even if entered into mou fsa arise at pune and words seat situs and place of arbitration as contemplated under section 20 we are referring to the following observations in balco of their business these orders have attained finality 8 on 31 july 2013 after the common judgment so referred above a
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSyed Althaf Ali and Others Vs. The Assistant Commissioner of Customs, ...
Court : Chennai
Decided on : Sep-14-2016
court in the case of union of india vs kamalakshi finance corporation reported in 1991 55 elt 433 sc has clearly 1 50 000 under section 112 a of the customs act by its order dated 29 06 2015 3 against the has not accepted the order and has filed revisions under section 129dd of the customs act 1962 however the proof of
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT