Finalization - Judgment Search Results

Golden Polymex (India) Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Reported in: (2003)(89)ECC238

..... b n chattopadhyay learned consultant for the appellants submits that the final products which were destroyed by fire are the goods in ..... same were intended to be utilised in the manufacture of the final product the appellant took the modvat credit and also utilised ..... factory and have not been used in the manufacture of the final product shri chattopadhyay ld consultant submits that following the ratio .....

McConnell Vs. Federal Election Comm'n

Court: US Supreme Court

..... respond to concerns about circumvention of regulations designed to protect the political process integrity finally because congress in its lengthy deliberations leading to bcra s enactment properly relied ..... and solicitation restrictions have only a marginal impact on political speech footnote 42 finally plaintiffs contend that the type of associational burdens that 323 imposes are fundamentally .....

Grasim Industries Limited Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2004)(164)ELT348TriDel

..... they had also declared caustic soda iye liquid chlorine and hydro chloric acid as final products that the appellants had filed another declaration on 29 10 194 specifically mentioning ..... general declaration declaring all machines machinery etc as capital goods for the manufacture of their final products caustic soda iye flakes liquid chlorine and hydrochloric acid subsequently they filed two .....

Debraj Dey Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2004)3CALLT349(HC),2003(90)ECC731,2003(156)ELT951(Cal)

..... the countries including bangladesh hence the petitioner also filed the writ petition challenging the final finding however it is to be recorded hereunder that both the findings were notified in ..... for disclosure of information there under the designated authority shall before coming to its final finding inform all interested parties the essential facts under consideration which form basis for his .....

Mukesh Kumar Suri Vs. Rajendra Kumar

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 2003(2)AWC1456

..... extend the time for filing the written statement the date for final hearing specified in the summons would be the date of first ..... date for filing the written statement then the date fixed for final hearing falling next after the last extended date for filing the ..... mind to identify the controversy any adjournment of the date for final hearing thereafter would not matter and would not push any further .....

Dr. Rohit Dandekar Vs. Dr. Raj Kavitha

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR2003KAR4431

..... seventh edition the word interlocutory as an adjective means interim or temporary not constituting a final resolution of the whole controversy 11 in venkataramaiya s law lexicon with legal maxims revised ..... made after judgment and merely directs how the declarations of right already given in the final judgment are to be worked out is termed interlocutory an interlocutory order though not conclusive .....

Smt. Meenakshamma Vs. Munivenkatappa

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2003Kant450; ILR2003KAR2753; 2004(1)KarLJ267

..... made after judgments and merely directs how the declaration of right already given in the final judgment are to be worked out is termed interlocutory an interlocutory order though not conclusive ..... involved while determining such applications would not be relevant for consideration at the time of final adjudication 9 the provisions under order 26 rule 9 for appointment of commissioner an application .....

Clay Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... like many legal terms its precise meaning depends on context typically a federal judgment becomes final for appellate review and claim preclusion purposes when the district court disassociates itself from the ..... nowrepealed version of federal rule of criminal procedure 33 several lower courts have held that finality attends issuance of the appellate court s mandate see brief for amicus curiae by .....

Mrityunjay Sen Vs. Shrimati Sikha Sen

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: AIR2003Cal165,(2003)1CALLT168(HC)

..... interlocutory order if it would not have the effect of finally disposing of the suit or other proceedings therefore now revision ..... would only lie against such interlocutory orders which would finally disposed of the suit or other proceedings and no revision ..... temporary injunction is granted or not granted is not decided finally either by grant or refusal thereof and continues to pending .....

Nike, Inc. Vs. Kasky

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in this case revolves around the fact that the california supreme court never entered a final judgment congress has granted this court appellate jurisdiction with respect to state litigation only after ..... declaratory judgment see 490 u s at 611 612 finding that two exceptions to normal finality requirements applied while the state court determination here where such declaratory relief was not sought .....