Feature - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: feature Year: 2012 Page 1 of about 6,703 results (0.066 seconds)Sopariwala Exports and Another Vs. Kuber Khaini Private Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-09-2012
..... submits that plaintiffs cannot claim an infringement if non essential features are imitated on the label of the defendants the learned ..... whose registration is sought contains the same distinguishing or essential feature or conveys the same idea then ordinarily the registrar would ..... together with the peculiar etching between them is an essential feature and hallmark of the appellant 15 insofar as the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. N.V. Diamcad and Another Vs. the Assistant Controller of Patents ...
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Aug-03-2012
..... is not supported by the description three translational axes and two rotational axes this feature is also not supported by the description which describes three translational and three rotational ..... the analysis of determination of inventive step of a claim having a combination of features combination of documents is permissible according to the counsel various documents and technologies available .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSopariwala Exports and Another Vs. Kuber Khaini Private Limited
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-09-2012
..... submits that plaintiffs cannot claim an infringement if non essential features are imitated on the label of the defendants the learned ..... whose registration is sought contains the same distinguishing or essential feature or conveys the same idea then ordinarily the registrar would ..... together with the peculiar etching between them is an essential feature and hallmark of the appellant 15 insofar as the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Himalaya Drug Company Vs. M/S. S.B.L. Limited
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Nov-09-2012
..... colour combination of two labels are different so as all other features the composition of two products is also different it is ..... of a label containing the words vicks vaporub as the essential feature registered in jamaica and the defendants used a similar label ..... with that trade mark the decisions referred with regard to essential features were followed by the division bench in the decision reported .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG. Sundarrajan Vs. the Union of India Rep. by the Secretary to Governm ...
Court: Chennai
Decided on: Aug-31-2012
..... produce electric power with high availability and safety was oriented towards preventive features while mitigative features were given lesser consideration the chernobyl design had some inherent serious ..... the safety standards in effect when it was designed and even incorporated unsafe features inadequate safety analysis insufficient attention to independent safety review operating procedures not .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTwentieth Century Fox Film Corporation Vs. Zee Telefilms Ltd. and Othe ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2012
..... according to the said defendants the serial 8222 pradhan mantri time bomb 8217 had all features including the digital clock windows technique nuclear attack and the assassination of the prime ..... which copyright subsists reflects the difficulty of the concept that a number of allegedly distinctive features of a television series can be isolated from the changing material presented in each separate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSpice Mobiles Ltd. and Another Vs. Somasundaram Ramkumar and Others
Court: Intellectual Property Appellate Board IPAB
Decided on: Jun-01-2012
..... communication networks in order to operate simultaneously a mobile phone can transreceive the entire features of a plurality of different communication networks simultaneously 3 a mobile phone as claimed ..... with different communication networks the counsel for first applicant further submitted that the other features of the claimed mobile phone are directed at using the phone as a telephone .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTwentieth Century Fox Film Vs. Zee Telefilms Ltd. and ors
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-10-2012
..... attempted to dissect the components of the plaintiffs serial and has contended that the common features in the comparison chart are common stock however such dissection is impermissible 20 the ..... which copyright subsists reflects the difficulty of the concept that a number of allegedly distinctive features of a television series can be isolated from the changing material presented in each separate .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.H. Kumari and Others Vs. the Director Nizam Institute of Medical Sci ...
Court: National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission NCDRC
Decided on: Jul-12-2012
..... changes adjacent ducts show papillomatosis rest of the areas shows fibrocystic disease the features are consistent with subareolar abscess left breast emphasis supplied viii some other ..... orange and nipple discharge axillary and supraclavicular glands require careful clinical evaluation the features of metastases pleural and pericardial effusion hepatomegaly ascites and other intraperitoneal masses .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. Whirpool of India Ltd. Vs. M/S. Videocon Industries Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-25-2012
..... is concerned learned counsel submits that the defendant by his innovation has added different various features like the ornamentation composition of lines and combination of colours he therefore submits that ..... circumstances the putting of a copy on to the market with the distinctive feature or combination of features in question would amount to a misrepresentation that it emanated from the plaintiff .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial