Favored - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: favored Year: 2007 Page 1 of about 810 results (0.015 seconds)United Haulers Assn., Inc. Vs. Oneida-herkimer Solid Waste Management ...
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Apr-30-2007
..... against interstate commerce compelling reasons justify treating these laws differently from laws favoring particular private businesses over their competitors a ny notion of discrimination assumes ..... dormant commerce clause compelling reasons justify treating these laws differently from laws favoring particular private businesses over their competitors conceptually of course any notion of discrimination .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajdhani Park Kalyan Karini Samiti Vs. Financial Commissioner and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-15-2007
Reported in: 142(2007)DLT226; 2007(97)DRJ38
..... to individual land holders whose names appeared in the records he allotted some lands in favor of respondent no 6 thereafter the settlement officer considered the objections filed by the ..... cpc seeking impleadment in which the revenue record entries confirm the above allotments in their favor iii the financial commissioner who entertained the revision petitions of the petitioner society lacked the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMr. Mukesh Bhargava and anr. Vs. Canara Bank and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: May-16-2007
Reported in: 2007(96)DRJ280
..... in view of the valid equitable mortgage having been created in favor of defendant no 1 bank whatever transactions have occurred thereafter ..... of the property and the effect of the alleged transfer in favor of the plaintiffs is being examined by the tribunal similarly ..... there can be no declaration of title in favor of the plaintiffs since the plaintiffs are owners by registered .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChopra Hospital (P) Ltd. Through Its Directors and ors. Vs. Usha Chopr ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-19-2007
Reported in: (2007)3CompLJ86(Del); [2007]79SCL299(Delhi)
..... his family members thus disinvestments of shares by the respondent in favor of the appellants was required the agreement does not stipulate ..... only talks about disinvestments of the shares by the respondent in favor of the appellants it is admitted that the respondent and ..... required disinvestments of the existing equity by the respondent in favor of the appellants the consideration to be paid by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Peerless General Finance and Investment Co. Ltd. Vs. Punjab and Si ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Aug-07-2007
Reported in: 2008(1)CTLJ74(Del)
..... in case such guarantees have been issued the said circular refers to guarantees issued in favor of non banking financial companies guaranteeing the repayment of multiple deposits kept by financial companies ..... provide any consequence in case of issuance of guarantees contrary to the provisions thereof in favor of third parties the bank guarantees cannot be said to have been invalidated the issue .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAditya Estate Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Land and Development Office and anr.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-30-2007
Reported in: 142(2007)DLT183
..... petitioner made an application for mutation of property in its favor the application was made to the land and development office ..... instead of mutating the property in favor of the petitioner the respondent land and development office issued ..... the request for mutation of the premises in question in favor of the petitioner if certain terms and conditions mentioned therein .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWilkie Vs. Robbins
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-2007
..... 1995 cancellation of the right of way in robbins s favor originally given in return for the unrecorded easement for the ..... official right where public official accepted cash in exchange for favorable votes on a rezoning application united states v gillock 445 ..... for summary judgment we recite the facts in the light most favorable to robbins footnote 3 according to robbins bureau officials neglected .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTParents Involved in Community Schools Vs. Seattle School Dist. No. 1
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-28-2007
..... constitution abhors classifications based on race not only because those classifications can harm favored races or are based on illegitimate motives but also because every time the ..... patrolling predominantly minority race neighborhoods efforts to desegregate racially segregated schools policies that favor minorities when distributing goods or services in short supply actions that create majority .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDart Industries Inc. and anr. Vs. Techno Plast and ors.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jun-04-2007
Reported in: 2007(35)PTC285(Del)
..... and got the invalid and publish domain designs registered in their favor in order to harass the bonafide users traders of the ..... designs valuation whereof is alleged by the plaintiffs are registered in favor of the plaintiffs under the designs act 2000 thereforee onus ..... if the designs were pre published before registration was granted in favor of the plaintiffs then such designs cannot be treated as .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMrs. Geeta Bhargava Vs. Pur Polyurethane Products Pvt. Ltd.
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Jul-30-2007
Reported in: 2007(97)DRJ346
..... purchase scheme had floated a scheme to regularize allotment in favor of the person who was occupying the premises presence of ..... different legal shape with dsidc executing a conveyance deed in favor of the plaintiff which conveyance deed has been challenged by ..... remedy to question the conveyance deed executed by dsidc in favor of the plaintiff 16 the petition succeeds impugned order dated .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial