Fashioned - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: fashioned Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 307 results (0.008 seconds)Gujarat Fashions (100% Eou) Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-04-2004
Reported in: (2004)(95)ECC240
..... wherein it is recorded that the partner of m s gujrat fashions appellants is also a proprietor of m s mahalaxmi exports and ..... mahalaxmi exports are also the office premises of m s gujrat fashions the appellants 5 on going through paragraph 4 of the show ..... 2001 statutory record showing the daily stock position belonging to gujrat fashions was not found in defence in their appeal memorandum enclosed to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAddi Fashions Vs. Director of Enforcement
Court: Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi
Decided on: Feb-16-2004
..... said order all the notices the firm by name m s addi fashions and its two partners were found guilty of the charges and ..... adjudication proceedings the charge against the firm was that m s addi fashions had failed to repatriate an export proceeds equal to rs 10 ..... in filing the appeals 8 according to the appellants m s addi fashions had started their business in export of readymade garments in 1987 that .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM.K.P. Fashions Vs. Commissioner of Customs (Port)
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta
Decided on: Aug-06-2004
Reported in: (2005)(99)ECC223
..... grade of chinese origin is being cleared by one m s m k p fashions no 88 ii main road aramane nagar palace guttahalli bangalore karnataka 560 020 ..... of mulberry raw silk 2a grade imported by m s m k p fashions after the goods were assessed and the customs duty of rs 6 53 ..... 2003 4 in the instant case the importer m s m k p fashions had filed the bill of entry on 12 5 2003 through their clearing .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTG.N. Siddha Reddy and K. Chitti Vs. Sisira Fashions Private Limited
Court: Company Law Board CLB
Decided on: Dec-13-2004
Reported in: (2005)5CompLJ286
..... the act alleging acts of oppression and mismanagement in the affairs of m s sisira fashions pvt ltd sfpl and m s smita exports pvt ltd sepl the petitioners have filed .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.T. Meyammai Vs. S. Mohamed Kamil, Proprietor Fashion 'N' Style
Court: Chennai
Decided on: May-25-2004
Reported in: 2004(4)CTC27; (2004)3MLJ215
..... and further stating that he is running the business in the name and style of fashion n style as a proprietory concern which was carried on in the name and style .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDhawani Fashions Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT
Decided on: Jul-02-2004
Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT169Tri(Bang.)
2 shri laxminarayana learned advocate appearing for the appellants stated that the appellants had imported one multi head embroidery machine...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTavIn Fashions Vs. Cc
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Aug-27-2004
Reported in: (2005)(118)LC100Tri(Delhi)
1 m s tavin fasions has filed the present appeal against the order in appeal no 122 2004 dated 28...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJ.B. Fashions Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-24-2004
Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT99TriDel
1 the appellant filed these appeals against the adjudication order passed by the commissioner appeals in this case benefit of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChamaria Fashions Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-29-2004
Reported in: (2005)(180)ELT170Tri(Mum.)bai
1 after hearing the appellant and finding out that the application for adjournment was sent by them we restore the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSristi Fashion Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Acto, Central Section and ors.
Court: Sales Tax Tribunal STT West Bengal
Decided on: May-21-2004
Reported in: (2008)11VST636NULL
1 this is an application for setting aside the order dated february 26 2004 passed by the respondent no 3...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial