Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: faridabad development corporation act 1956 section 1 short title Court: madhya pradesh Page 47 of about 466 results (0.068 seconds)

M/s Gemini Fuels Pvt.Ltd. Vs. Commercial Tax Officer Judgement Give ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... us in para 38 above. (vii) the above propositions mutatis mutandis shall apply to all pending matters where above aspects are under consideration. in sarla verma vs. delhi transport corporation (2009) 6 scc121 it has been held :19. to have uniformity and consistency, tribunals should determine compensation in cases of death, by the following well settled steps : ..... the instance of the insurance company. before dwelling on m.a. 1841/2011, an appeal by the claimant for enhancement, worth it would be to take note of recent development. in reshma kumari and ors. vs. madan mohan and anr. : civil appeal no.4646/2009 decided on 2.4.2013, a three-judge bench of the supreme ..... regarding involve- ment of the offending vehicle and on quantum. the appeal has been filed on the strength of permission granted under section 170 of the motor vehicles act, 1988. misc. appeal 1841/2011 is by the claimants for enhance- ment of compensation on the ground that the tribunal has erred in properly computing the gross .....

Heeraman Sonkar Vs. the State of M.P. and anr

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... and without placing it before this court, deserves to be rejected.25. quite apart from the above, the supreme court in the case of uttranchal road transport corporation & ors. v. mansaram nainwal air2006sc2860has held that the judgment is a precedent only in respect of the facts involved in a particular case in the following terms ..... initiate negotiations for acquisition within a period of 3 years, failing which the land acquisition proceedings may be initiated and s. 57 postulates the commencement of the development work after the land is acquired and is vested in the authority. as such the word 'implementation' can never be construed to mean that the scheme ..... vested in the authority under s. 56 of the act in accordance with the provisions of the town development scheme, the authority shall take necessary steps to develop the land. thereafter also the state government or the director has a supervisory power to ensure that the development is in accordance with the scheme and may also issue .....

State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. Vishal Singh and anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : 1994CriLJ3428

..... hurt might be caused to them and, therefore, they were justified in the exercise of their right of private defence of person and property to open fire. as such, their act is protected under section 9, i.p.c. and the learned trial judge was patently in error in holding, in paragraph 25 of the impugned judgment, that the entries in ..... cri lj):it is true that there are many contradictions in the evidence of the victim of assault. he has not attributed overt acts to individual accused in his statement before the police whereas he has attributed such overt acts in his evidence before the court. but that is no ground to reject his entire testimony. it must not be forgotten that .....

State of Madhya Pradesh and Others Vs. M/s. Lion Engineering Consultan ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... be found in the decision in chiranjilal shrilal goenka (supra), harshad chiman lal modi vs. dlf universal ltd.and another : (2005) 7 scc 791 and rajasthan state road transport corporation and another vs. bal mukund bairwa : (2009) 4 scc 299. in harshad chiman lal modi (supra) it is held : "30. we are unable to uphold the contention ..... sole arbitrator and that order dated 11.5.2007 attained finality." 14. however, the aspect of applicability of the act of 1983 or the act of 1996 in a 'works contract' came to be considered in madhya pradesh rural road development authority and another vs. l.g.chaudhary engineers and contractors : (2012) 3 scc 495 wherein after taking ..... be sustained and we hold that the application under section 9 of the 1996 act was maintainable." 13. placing reliance on the decision in va. tech (supra) in a similar facts situtation as in the present case supreme court in aps kushwaha (ssi unit) vs. municipal corporation, gwalior and others : (2011) 13 scc 258 held : "7. this .....

State Bank of India Vs. SBI Workmen Union

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... counsel has placed reliance on the judgments in the matters of the state bank of india vs. shri n. sundara money, air 1976 sc 1111, punjab land development and reclamation corporation ltd. chandigarh vs. presiding officer, labour court, chandigarh and others, (1990) 3 scc 682, anoop sharma vs. executive engineer, public health, division no.1 ..... had worked for years together and, therefore, management was not justified terminating their services without complying with section 25-f of the industrial disputes act. the tribunal also commented upon the stand taken by the petitioner/management inter alia observing that on the one hand management stated that these workmen ..... employment at any time during the aforesaid period, therefore, their non-engagement would not be a retrenchment under section 2(oo) of the industrial disputes act. hence, discontinuance of the workmen shall not make them liable for payment of compensation and, therefore, for want of compensation, discontinuance cannot be said .....

Ansaldo Energia, S.P.A. Vs. M.P.State Electricity Board

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... judge has rightly set aside the award. reliance was placed to the judgment of apex court in grid corporation of orissa ltd. and another vs. balasore technical school (2000) 9 scc 55.and delhi development authority vs. r.s. sharma and company, (2008) 13 scc 80.(d) that as per the ..... bank [15]. guarantees. (g) the aforesaid award was challenged before the district judge by the respondents under section 34 of the arbitration and conciliation act, 1996 on the following grounds:- (1) that the bank guarantees were independent agreements between the bankers of the claimants and the respondents therein and ..... m.p. power general co. ltd., through its managing director, shakti bhawan, nayagaon, jabalpur (m.p.) ..........respondents present: hon. shri justice krishn kumar lahoti, acting c.j.hon. smt. justice vimla jain ___________________________________________________________________ shri s.u. kamdar, learned senior advocate with shri nahoush shah, shri manot sharma and shri alok hoonka, advocates .....