Familiarizing - Judgment Search Results

Dr. Mrs. Renuka Datla Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: (2000)158CTR(AP)555; [1999]240ITR463(AP)

..... seizure of ganja plants the in charge village administrative officer p w 3 was not familiar with the area and issued an incorrect certificate under ex p 2 admittedly survey number .....

Habeeb Sultana Vs. Mohd. SharfuddIn Khan

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1999(6)ALD232; II(2000)DMC668

..... pws 1 and 2 can validly claim that they are familiar with the handwriting and the signature of the respondent defendant ..... the relevant provision in the indian evidence act which envisages the familiar evidence section 47 of the indian evidence act reads as ..... probablise the version of the appellant and would further strengthen her familiar evidence 13 the court below should have proceeded to compare .....

B.J. Shetty and Others Vs. Air India Limited and Another

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(4)ALLMR559; 2000(1)BomCR743; 2000(4)MhLj274

..... resolutions is different from the test of the reasonable man familiar to the law of torts whom english jaw figuratively identifies ..... this is the essence of lord greene s dictum now familiar as the wednesbury unreasonableness in associated provincial picture houses ltd ..... must be exercised reasonably now what does that mean lawyers familiar with the phraseology used in relation to exercise of statutory .....

Hmg Engineering Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union Bank of India and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(4)ALLMR653; 2000(1)BomCR221; 1999(3)MhLj670

..... of mr c t khubchandani the representative of the petitioner who was familiar with the facts of the case on behalf of the petitioner ..... that only mr c t khubchandani the representative of the petitioner was familiar with the facts of the case and the advocate of the ..... that mr c t khubchandani the representative of the petitioner who was familiar with the facts of the case was seriously ill and that .....

Marriott International Inc. and Others Vs. Ansal Hotels Ltd. and Anoth ...

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1999VIAD(Delhi)340; AIR2000Delhi377; 82(1999)DLT137

..... expertise and information from the professional hoteliers it was discovered that the petitioners were not familiar with the requirements of the hoteliers in india they could not give the details ..... expertise and opinion from the professional hoteliers it was discovered that the petitioners were not familiar with the requirements of the hoteliers in india they could not give the information .....

Holloway Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... that congress obviously intended to prohibit second it is reasonable to presume that congress was familiar with the leading cases and the scholarly writing recognizing that the specific intent to commit ..... wellestablished historical tradition absent a more settled tradition it cannot be presumed that congress was familiar with this usage when it enacted the statute for these reasons i agree with .....

Carmell Vs. Texas

Court: US Supreme Court

..... some kind of reason against this to the end that those laws may not grow familiar that they may not easily be obtained because precedents generally grow and as that law ..... its discussion of the ex post facto clause by quoting verbatim justice chase s now familiar opinion in calder and his four category definition id at 41 42 after noting that .....

MartIn Vs. Hadix

Court: US Supreme Court

..... enactment landgraf 511 u s at 270 this judgment should be informed and guided by familiar considerations of fair notice reasonable reliance and settled expectations ibid pp 357 358 2 for ..... before its enactment i d at 270 this judgment should be informed and guided by familiar considerations of fair notice reasonable reliance and settled expectations ibid 1 for post judgment monitoring .....

Strickler Vs. Greene

Court: US Supreme Court

..... in which the standard is customarily couched the court speaks in terms of the familiar and perhaps familiarly deceptive formulation whether there is a reasonable probability of a different outcome if the .....

Atandt Corp. Vs. Iowa Utilities Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... cannot be read in isolation as the first justice harlan once observed it is a familiar rule in the interpretation of statutes that a passage will be best interpreted by reference ..... factors such as local history geography demands and costs and local regulators are likely more familiar than are national regulators for example with a particular utility s physical plant its cost .....