Fallacious - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: fallacious Year: 1982 Page 1 of about 2,642 results (0.069 seconds)Lugar Vs. Edmondson Oil Co., Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-1982
page 457 u s 948 there are at least two fallacies in the court s conclusion first as is apparent from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGurpreet Singh Sidhu and ors. Vs. Punjab University, Chandigarh and or ...
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Sep-09-1982
Reported in: AIR1983P& H70
..... close analysis discloses that the aforesaid contentions suffers from an insidious fallacy which in essence boomerangs on the stand taken by the ..... the central government itself is on the face of it both fallacious and untenable 11 once the aforesaid finding is arrived at ..... action and private action which seems to have led to the fallacy of assuming that what would be true qua institutions exclusively .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTJagdish Rai Monga and ors. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: May-17-1982
Reported in: AIR1983P& H33
..... overlap nor can be said to merge into each other consequently it would be a fallacy to equate the dissolution of the trust under section 103 with the temporary suspension or ..... to dissolve the trusts under s 103 of the act 35 somewhat ingenious though obviously fallacious contention sought to be raised on behalf of the petitioners was that the impugned notification .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Ahmedabad Manufacturing and Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-29-1982
Reported in: 1983LC1D(Gujarat)
..... such is the argument in our opinion there is a basic misconception and a fundamental fallacy in this argument certain basic aspects are overlooked what is overlooked is that section 3 ..... taken as a whole en bloc and read conjointly constitutes the charging section it is fallacious to assume that section 3 standing alone is that charging section this is as evident .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKalwa Vs. Vasakha Singh and anr.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Feb-01-1982
Reported in: AIR1982P& H480
s s sandhawalia c j 1 ther sub section 2 of section 15 of the punjab pre emption act 1913...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnited States Vs. Goodwin
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-18-1982
..... trial and a jury trial is unimportant in this context such a suggestion is demonstrably fallacious experienced criminal practitioners for both prosecution and defense know that a jury trial entails far ..... manifestly poses a realistic likelihood of vindictiveness the truth of my conclusion and the patent fallacy of the court s is particularly evident on the record before us the practical effect .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTradesvel Security Services Pvt. Ltd. Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-02-1982
Reported in: (1982)84BOMLR608
..... the subject unless these laws be incorporated by reference in our opinion this is a fallacious argument the court in judging the reasonableness of a law will necessarily see not only ..... him this would seriously infringe his right to carry on his business to expose the fallacy of this argument it is sufficient to point out that at present such costly security .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNational Assn. of Motion Pictures Exhibitors, Delhi Vs. Union of India ...
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Dec-20-1982
Reported in: ILR1983Delhi691
sachar j 1 does delhi administration lack competency in law to fix rates for admission to cinematograph exhibition in cinema...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTVichitra Banwarilal Meena Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-11-1982
Reported in: AIR1982Raj297; 1982()WLN294
..... be retarded and they would be deprived of equality and opportunities of status is extremely fallacious mistaken and devoid of any force contrary to it this protection would help them in ..... and real and effective homage to article 46 95 vichitra is unfortunately labouring under the fallacy and obsolete dogmatic reactionary outdated and outlived principles laid down by u s supreme court .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAhmedabad Mfg. and Calico Prtg. Ltd. and ors. Vs. Union of India
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Oct-26-1982
Reported in: 1984(2)ECC63; 1982(10)ELT821(Guj); (1983)1GLR1
..... such is the argument in our opinion there is a basic misconception and a fundamental fallacy in this argument certain basic aspects are overlooked what is overlooked is that section 3 ..... act taken as a whole embloc and read conjointly constitutes the charging section it is fallacious to assume that section 3 standing alone is the charging section this is as evident .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial